South Dakota Jury Instruction — Buying Or Receiving Goods Stolen From Interstate Shipment In South Dakota, a specific jury instruction exists to address the offense of buying or receiving goods stolen from interstate shipment. This instruction provides detailed guidance to a jury in understanding the elements of the offense and the relevant legal principles involved. Keywords: South Dakota, jury instruction, buying or receiving, goods stolen, interstate shipment When a person is accused of buying or receiving goods that were stolen from interstate shipment, the South Dakota jury is provided instructions to evaluate the evidence and make an informed decision. This jury instruction ensures that jurors are aware of the specific elements that need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a conviction. The jury instruction would outline the following key points: 1. Definition of the crime: The instruction would define the offense of buying or receiving goods stolen from interstate shipment, emphasizing that it is illegal to knowingly purchase or receive goods that have been stolen from interstate transportation. 2. Required elements: The instruction would specify the elements that the prosecution must prove in order to secure a conviction. These elements may include establishing that the defendant knowingly bought or received goods, knowing that the goods were stolen, and that the theft occurred during the interstate shipment of the goods. 3. Knowledge requirement: The instruction would explain that the defendant must have had knowledge that the goods were stolen. It may further detail that this knowledge can be proven through direct evidence or via circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the goods were stolen. 4. Interstate shipment: The instruction would address the requirement that the theft occurred during the interstate shipment of the goods. It might explain that this means the goods were transported across state boundaries or involved multiple states in the course of their transportation. The jury instruction may also provide additional guidance, variations, or options for the jury depending on the specific circumstances of the case or potential defense arguments. These variations or options would clarify legal principles or factors to be considered when reaching a verdict. Additionally, South Dakota may have different types or variations of the jury instruction based on the severity or specific aspects of the offense. Examples of possible variations could include instructions for cases involving different types of stolen goods, varying degrees of knowledge or intent by the defendant, or other factors that might impact the level of offense or potential penalties involved. Overall, the South Dakota jury instruction for buying or receiving goods stolen from interstate shipment serves as a crucial legal reference for jurors and plays a vital role in ensuring fair and consistent verdicts in such cases.