The South Dakota Voting Agreement between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey is a legally binding document that outlines the terms and conditions relating to the sale of outstanding common stock. This agreement aims to establish the rights and obligations of the involved parties to ensure a fair and transparent process. Keywords: South Dakota, Voting Agreement, Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, Kevin Casey, sale, outstanding common stock. This agreement is designed to protect the interests of all parties involved and ensures that the sale of outstanding common stock is conducted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. It outlines the specific procedures, timelines, and conditions that must be followed to complete the transaction successfully. In addition to the general provisions, there may be different types of South Dakota Voting Agreements between these entities related to the sale of outstanding common stock. Some variations could include: 1. South Dakota Voting Agreement for Majority Shareholders: This type of agreement is applicable when one party holds a majority of the outstanding common stock. It may outline additional rights and privileges for majority shareholders, such as veto power over certain decisions or the ability to appoint board members. 2. South Dakota Voting Agreement for Minority Shareholders: In cases where one or more parties are minority shareholders, a specific type of agreement may be created to address their rights and protect their interests. These agreements may include provisions to ensure fair treatment, representation on the board, or voting thresholds required for certain actions. 3. South Dakota Voting Agreement for Equal Shareholders: If the outstanding common stock is equally distributed among the parties, a unique agreement may be formulated to establish a balanced decision-making process. It could outline provisions for resolving disputes, voting procedures, or mechanisms for deadlock situations. 3. South Dakota Voting Agreement for Preferred Stockholders: In circumstances where the parties hold preferred stock to common stock, a distinct voting agreement may be necessary. This agreement could delineate the rights and preferences of preferred stockholders regarding the sale of common stock and any implications on their investment. These are just a few potential variations of South Dakota Voting Agreements that may exist between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey regarding the sale of outstanding common stock. The specific content and clauses within these agreements would depend on the unique circumstances and requirements of the parties involved.