Tennessee Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 1 8 USC Sect. 2: In Tennessee, when it comes to aiding and abetting a crime, the concept of agency is crucial. Jury instruction 1 8 USC Sect. 2 is designed to provide guidance on how to determine whether a person can be held accountable for aiding and abetting a crime based on the principle of agency. The relevant keywords for this topic include: 1. Tennessee: This instruction pertains specifically to the state of Tennessee, where the jury is provided with guidance on how to evaluate cases involving aiding and abetting and the concept of agency. 2. Jury Instruction: A jury instruction is a set of guidelines given to the jury by the judge, instructing them on how to interpret the law and apply it to the facts of the case. In this context, the jury instruction relates to cases involving aiding and abetting and agency in Tennessee. 3. Aiding and Abetting: Aiding and abetting refers to the act of assisting, encouraging, or participating in the commission of a crime committed by another person. It involves knowingly and intentionally helping or encouraging the principal offender in the commission of the crime. 4. Agency: The concept of agency is crucial to understand when determining whether a person can be held accountable for aiding and abetting a crime. In the legal context, agency refers to a consensual relationship between two parties, where one person (the agent) acts on behalf of another person (the principal). If the person aiding and abetting has an agency relationship with the principal offender, they may be held accountable for the principal's actions. Types of Tennessee Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 1 8 USC Sect. 2 may include instructions for specific scenarios or elements that need to be proven. Some potential types could be: 1. Tennessee Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 1 8 USC Sect. 2: Elements: This instruction would outline the essential elements that the prosecution must prove to establish the defendant's guilt in aiding and abetting a crime based on the principle of agency. It may include elements such as knowing participation, intent to assist, and a clear agency relationship. 2. Tennessee Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 1 8 USC Sect. 2: Evaluation of Agency Relationship: This instruction would focus on the jury's evaluation of the agency relationship between the person aiding and abetting and the principal offender. It may instruct the jury on how to assess evidence and determine if a valid agency exists, using factors such as control, consent, and authority. 3. Tennessee Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 1 8 USC Sect. 2: Defenses: This instruction would outline potential defenses that the defendant may present against charges of aiding and abetting based on agency. It may include defenses such as lack of knowledge, absence of intent to assist, or disproving the existence of an agency relationship. It is important to note that the specific types of jury instructions may vary depending on the particular case and the judge's discretion. The examples provided are hypothetical possibilities to illustrate the potential variations that may exist within this legal context.