The Texas complaint regarding strict product liability in the case of Delta Wood can be classified into multiple sections addressing various legal aspects. These sections can include: 1. Breach of Expressed Warranty: This section of the complaint would focus on how Delta Wood failed to uphold any expressed warranty provided to the plaintiff. The plaintiff would detail the specific terms and conditions of the warranty and explain how Delta Wood failed to meet these obligations. 2. Implied Warranty: In this section, the complaint would outline the implied warranty of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The plaintiff would argue that the product sold by Delta Wood was reasonably expected to be fit for its intended use, but it fell short of this standard, resulting in damages or injuries. 3. Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability: Here, the complaint would address how Delta Wood's product did not meet the ordinary expectations of a reasonable buyer. The plaintiff would highlight any defects or flaws that rendered the product unfit for its ordinary purpose. 4. Negligence: This section would assert that Delta Wood's actions or lack thereof resulted in the plaintiff's injury or damage. The plaintiff would argue that the company breached its duty of care by manufacturing or selling a defective product, and as a result, the plaintiff suffered harm. 5. Punitive Damages: This section would seek to impose punitive damages on Delta Wood, aiming to deter similar conduct and punish the defendant for their actions. The plaintiff would argue that these damages are necessary due to Delta Wood's gross negligence or willful misconduct. By including these relevant keywords such as breach of expressed warranty, implied warranty, merchantability, negligence, and punitive damages, the complaint effectively addresses different legal claims against Delta Wood.