Impeachment of Defendant — Prior Inconsistent Statement Taken in Violation of Miranda is a legal term used to describe a situation in which the defendant has been impeached (challenged) based on a prior statement made by them that is inconsistent with their current statement and was taken in a manner that violated their Miranda rights. This type of impeachment is typically used in criminal cases in order to attack the credibility of the defendant’s current testimony. The two types of Impeachment of Defendant — Prior Inconsistent Statement Taken in Violation of Miranda are: # Direct Impeachment: This type of impeachment occurs when the witness’s prior statement is read or shown to the jury, allowing the jury to compare the witness’s current testimony to the prior statement. # Cross-Examination Impeachment: This type of impeachment occurs when the attorney questions the witness about their prior statement, allowing the jury to compare the prior statement to the witness’s current testimony.