Credibility of Witnesses — Testimony of Informer is a legal term used to describe the trustworthiness, accuracy, and reliability of an informant's testimony. It is a critical factor in determining the admissibility of evidence presented in criminal proceedings. In criminal trials, due to the nature of the proceedings, it is important to evaluate the credibility of the informant's testimony. This evaluation is conducted by assessing the informant's qualifications, experience, and credibility. There are three types of Credibility of Witnesses — Testimony of Informer: 1. Qualification: The court considers the informant's qualifications, which may include their experience in the subject or profession, their education, and any special certifications or licenses they may possess. 2. Experience: The court considers the informant's experience in the subject at hand or their familiarity with the facts of the case. 3. Credibility: The court evaluates the informant's credibility by assessing their bias, any potential conflicts of interest, and any prior criminal history or other issues that may affect their testimony.