Concurring Proximate Causes-Liability-General Verdict is a legal doctrine that states that when two or more causes of harm can be identified, and either one of them could have caused the plaintiff’s injury, the defendant is liable for the injury. This doctrine is based on the notion that the defendant’s conduct was a proximate cause of the injury, and that the two causes worked together to create an injury that would not have occurred but for the combination of both causes. There are two types of Concurring Proximate Causes-Liability-General Verdict: contributory negligence and superseding proximate cause. In a contributory negligence situation, the plaintiff’s own negligence contributes to his injury, and the defendant is liable for the injury if his negligence was the proximate cause. In a superseding proximate cause situation, the defendant’s negligence overpowers the plaintiff’s negligence, and the defendant is liable for the injury even if the plaintiff’s negligence contributed to the injury. In a general verdict, a jury decides whether the defendant is liable for the injury based on the evidence presented.