The Issues-Tort of Outrage-Burden of Proof is a legal concept that refers to the burden of proof required to establish that a defendant has committed the tort of outrage. This tort, also known as intentional infliction of emotional distress, is an intentional tort that occurs when a defendant engages in extreme and outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional distress to the plaintiff. In order for the plaintiff to prevail in a tort of outrage case, they must prove that the defendant's conduct was extreme and outrageous, and that it was the direct and proximate cause of the plaintiff's emotional distress. The burden of proof for the tort of outrage is higher than that of other torts, and is usually set at a clear and convincing standard. This higher burden of proof is due to the fact that the tort of outrage requires more than just negligence or recklessness in order to be established, and that the conduct must be extreme and outrageous in nature. The different types of Issues-Tort of Outrage-Burden of Proof include: • Clear and Convincing Evidence: This is the burden of proof set for tort of outrage cases and is higher than that of other torts. • Extreme and Outrageous Conduct: This is the type of conduct that must be proven in order for the plaintiff to prevail in a tort of outrage case. • Direct and Proximate Cause: This is the element of causation that must be established in order to prove that the defendant's conduct was the direct and proximate cause of the plaintiff's emotional distress.