1.03 Explanatory: General; Nature of Case; Burden of Proof; Duty of Jury; Cautionary is an instruction given to a jury in a criminal trial. It is designed to help a jury understand the task it is asked to perform. It explains the general principles of a criminal trial, the nature of the case, the burden of proof, the duty of the jury and any cautionary instructions. Specifically, 1.03 Explanatory: General; Nature of Case; Burden of Proof; Duty of Jury; Cautionary includes the following types of instructions: • General: Explains the roles of the judge, the prosecution and the defense, the types of evidence, and the rules of the court. • Nature of Case: Explains the elements of the crime charged, the parties involved and the applicable law. • Burden of Proof: Explains the burden of proof required to convict a defendant of a crime, usually “beyond a reasonable doubt.” • Duty of Jury: Explains the jury’s responsibility to weigh the evidence and reach a verdict based on the law and the facts. • Cautionary: Details any special instructions relevant to the case, such as instructions not to consider certain evidence or testimony.
1.03 EXPLANATORY: GENERAL; NATURE OF CASE; BURDEN OF PROOF; DUTY OF JURY; CAUTIONARY
Description
How to fill out 1.03 EXPLANATORY: GENERAL; NATURE OF CASE; BURDEN OF PROOF; DUTY OF JURY; CAUTIONARY?
US Legal Forms is the most simple and profitable way to locate suitable legal templates. It’s the most extensive web-based library of business and individual legal paperwork drafted and verified by attorneys. Here, you can find printable and fillable templates that comply with federal and local laws - just like your 1.03 EXPLANATORY: GENERAL; NATURE OF CASE; BURDEN OF PROOF; DUTY OF JURY; CAUTIONARY.
Getting your template takes just a couple of simple steps. Users that already have an account with a valid subscription only need to log in to the web service and download the document on their device. Later, they can find it in their profile in the My Forms tab.
And here’s how you can obtain a professionally drafted 1.03 EXPLANATORY: GENERAL; NATURE OF CASE; BURDEN OF PROOF; DUTY OF JURY; CAUTIONARY if you are using US Legal Forms for the first time:
- Read the form description or preview the document to make sure you’ve found the one meeting your requirements, or locate another one utilizing the search tab above.
- Click Buy now when you’re sure of its compatibility with all the requirements, and judge the subscription plan you like most.
- Register for an account with our service, log in, and purchase your subscription using PayPal or you credit card.
- Decide on the preferred file format for your 1.03 EXPLANATORY: GENERAL; NATURE OF CASE; BURDEN OF PROOF; DUTY OF JURY; CAUTIONARY and save it on your device with the appropriate button.
Once you save a template, you can reaccess it at any time - simply find it in your profile, re-download it for printing and manual fill-out or upload it to an online editor to fill it out and sign more effectively.
Take advantage of US Legal Forms, your reliable assistant in obtaining the required formal documentation. Give it a try!
Form popularity
FAQ
When the prosecutor makes their case, they must prove all the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, for the shoplifting example, they must show that the defendant took something from a store.
Jury Deliberations & Announcement of the Verdict In federal criminal trials, the jury must reach a unanimous decision in order to convict the defendant. After they reach an agreement on a verdict, they notify the judge, the lawyers, and the defendant in open court.
An example of this would be a trial for manslaughter in which the prosecution was only able to convince the jury panel that you had a 75% chance of committing the crime. Because the jury is 25% uncertain, the prosecution was not successful in proving beyond a reasonable doubt that you are guilty.
Reasonable doubt is insufficient evidence that prevents a judge or jury from convicting a defendant of a crime. If it cannot be proved without a doubt that a defendant in a criminal case is guilty, then that person should not be convicted.
A reasonable doubt may arise either from the evidence or from a lack of evidence. Reasonable doubt exists when you are not firmly convinced of the Defendant's guilt, after you have weighed and considered all the evidence. A Defendant must not be convicted on suspicion or speculation.
This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial. In other words, the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt in order to render a guilty verdict.
By a ?reasonable doubt? is not meant a possible doubt, but such a doubt, arising from the evidence, that leaves the minds of the jury in such a state that they cannot say, after having reviewed all the evidence, that they have an abiding conviction, to a moral certainty, of the guilt of the accused.
Admissible: A term used to describe evidence that may be considered by a jury or a judge in civil and criminal cases.