Impeachment of Witness Because of Bad Reputation for (or Opinion about) Truthfulness is a legal process that occurs in a court of law. It involves challenging the credibility of a witness based on their prior reputation for truthfulness or opinion about their truthfulness. This is usually done by introducing evidence of the witness’s bad reputation or opinion, such as a prior criminal conviction or testimony from other witnesses. There are two types of impeachment of witness because of bad reputation for (or opinion about) truthfulness: direct and indirect. Direct Impeachment of Witness Because of Bad Reputation for (or Opinion about) Truthfulness involves presenting evidence to the court that specifically shows the witness’s reputation or opinion. This may include introducing prior conviction records, testimony from other witnesses, or other documents that demonstrate the witness’s bad reputation or opinion. Indirect Impeachment of Witness Because of Bad Reputation for (or Opinion about) Truthfulness involves questioning the witness in an effort to discredit their testimony. This may include asking questions about their experiences, or asking them to explain why they may have an interest in the outcome of the case. The goal of indirect impeachment is to make the witness appear untrustworthy and their testimony unreliable.