1.13 Testimony of Witness: Deciding What to Believe is a process of evaluating the credibility and accuracy of information provided by a witness. It involves analyzing the consistency of the witness’s testimony, the level of detail provided, the relevance of the information to the case, and how the witness relates to the parties involved. It also includes assessing the potential biases of the witness, their ability to remember the events accurately, and any potential conflicts of interest. The primary types of 1.13 Testimony of Witness: Deciding What to Believe are direct and circumstantial testimony. Direct testimony is the first-hand accounts of witnesses who were present at the scene or witnessed the event in question. Circumstantial testimony is based on evidence that suggests a certain line of reasoning or inference, rather than having direct knowledge of the event.
1.13 Testimony of Witness: Deciding What to Believe is a process of evaluating the credibility and accuracy of information provided by a witness. It involves analyzing the consistency of the witness’s testimony, the level of detail provided, the relevance of the information to the case, and how the witness relates to the parties involved. It also includes assessing the potential biases of the witness, their ability to remember the events accurately, and any potential conflicts of interest. The primary types of 1.13 Testimony of Witness: Deciding What to Believe are direct and circumstantial testimony. Direct testimony is the first-hand accounts of witnesses who were present at the scene or witnessed the event in question. Circumstantial testimony is based on evidence that suggests a certain line of reasoning or inference, rather than having direct knowledge of the event.
