11.2.7 Means-Plus-Function Claims .

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-JURY-7THCIR-11-2-7
Format:
Word
Instant download
This website is not affiliated with any governmental entity
Public form

Description

Official Pattern Jury Instructions adopted by Federal 7th Circuit Court. All converted to Word format. Please see the official site for addional information. www.ca7.uscourts.gov/pattern-jury-instructions/pattern-jury.htm
11.2.7 Means-Plus-Function Claims (MPH Claims) are a type of patent claim defined by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). MPH Claims are a specific type of functional claiming that limits the scope of a patent’s protectionMPHPF Claims are used to protect a particular invention’s structure, material, or acts that are necessary to achieve a desired result. MPH Claims are defined by 35 U.S.C. § 112(f), which states that "an element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof." MPH Claims can be either structural or non-structural. Structural MPH Claims focus on the physical components of an invention that are necessary to perform a desired function. Non-structural MPH Claims are broader in scope and focus more on the functionality of an invention rather than its material components.

11.2.7 Means-Plus-Function Claims (MPH Claims) are a type of patent claim defined by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). MPH Claims are a specific type of functional claiming that limits the scope of a patent’s protectionMPHPF Claims are used to protect a particular invention’s structure, material, or acts that are necessary to achieve a desired result. MPH Claims are defined by 35 U.S.C. § 112(f), which states that "an element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof." MPH Claims can be either structural or non-structural. Structural MPH Claims focus on the physical components of an invention that are necessary to perform a desired function. Non-structural MPH Claims are broader in scope and focus more on the functionality of an invention rather than its material components.

How to fill out 11.2.7 Means-Plus-Function Claims .?

Preparing official paperwork can be a real stress if you don’t have ready-to-use fillable templates. With the US Legal Forms online library of formal documentation, you can be confident in the blanks you find, as all of them comply with federal and state regulations and are examined by our experts. So if you need to complete 11.2.7 Means-Plus-Function Claims ., our service is the best place to download it.

Getting your 11.2.7 Means-Plus-Function Claims . from our service is as easy as ABC. Previously authorized users with a valid subscription need only sign in and click the Download button once they find the correct template. Afterwards, if they need to, users can pick the same document from the My Forms tab of their profile. However, even if you are unfamiliar with our service, registering with a valid subscription will take only a few minutes. Here’s a brief instruction for you:

  1. Document compliance check. You should carefully examine the content of the form you want and make sure whether it suits your needs and meets your state law requirements. Previewing your document and looking through its general description will help you do just that.
  2. Alternative search (optional). If there are any inconsistencies, browse the library through the Search tab above until you find a suitable blank, and click Buy Now when you see the one you need.
  3. Account registration and form purchase. Sign up for an account with US Legal Forms. After account verification, log in and choose your most suitable subscription plan. Make a payment to continue (PayPal and credit card options are available).
  4. Template download and further usage. Select the file format for your 11.2.7 Means-Plus-Function Claims . and click Download to save it on your device. Print it to complete your paperwork manually, or use a multi-featured online editor to prepare an electronic version faster and more effectively.

Haven’t you tried US Legal Forms yet? Subscribe to our service today to get any formal document quickly and easily any time you need to, and keep your paperwork in order!

Form popularity

FAQ

112(f) interpretation. Every case will turn on its own unique set of facts. The standard is whether the words of the claim are understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art to have a sufficiently definite meaning as the name for structure.? Williamson v.

For example, an inventor could claim an electronic or electromechanical device by describing circuits performing specific functions, as opposed to the circuitry of the actual device.

§112(f), ?an element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and

A form of patent claim that both: Expresses an element by its function rather than by any structure, material, or acts. Covers the structure, material, or acts, and any equivalents, which the patent's specification describes as corresponding to the function.

Citing more than two decades of precedent, the Court emphasized that infringement of means-plus-function claims requires proof of three things: That the accused structure performs the (1) identical function, (2) in substantially the same way (3) with substantially the same result, as the disclosed structure.

§ 112(f) Language ? A claim limitation that does not use the term ?means? or. ?step? creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim. limitation is not interpreted under § 112(f) ? This presumption is rebutted when the claim limitation recites. function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to.

112, first paragraph require that the specification include the following: (A) A written description of the invention; (B) The manner and process of making and using the invention (the enablement requirement); and. (C) The best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.

Claim interpretation is important in determining the scope of your patent rights and in determining whether anyone else has a patent that would prevent you from making, using, selling or importing an apparatus or method. must possess each claimed element, or something equivalent to the element.

More info

11.2.7 Means-Plus-Function Claims. 11.2. "Stepplusfunction" limitations are rare because claim steps typically use action words that rebut the presumption that § 112(f) applies.On appeal, the majority concluded that it was error to treat "distributed control module" as a meansplusfunction claim term. 7, Updated title and added guidance regarding withdrawn claim issues. Prerequisites: Complete these steps after completing the upgrade steps described in Upgrading EPM System in the Oracle Enterprise Performance. 2015)) meansplusfunction case law and the required disclosure of structure to avoid an indefiniteness issue. With more than 300 levels, ultra-challenging endless zones, fun mini-games, and daily Piñata Party events, there's always a new challenge to complete.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

11.2.7 Means-Plus-Function Claims .