• US Legal Forms

15.18 Infringement-Likelihood of Confusion-Factors-Sleekcraft Test

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-JURY-9THCIR-15-18
Format:
Rich Text
Instant download
This website is not affiliated with any governmental entity
Public form

Description

Sample Jury Instructions from the 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals. http://www3.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/

15.18 Infringement-Likelihood of Confusion-Factors-Sleekcraft Test is a legal test used to evaluate the likelihood of confusion in trademark infringement cases. It is also known as the Sleek craft analysis or the Polaroid test. The test was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1979 case of Linwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. The test is based on eight factors that consider the similarities and differences between the marks, the strength of the marks, the similarity of the goods and services, the marketing channels used, the degree of care exercised by customers, the defendants’ intent in selecting the mark, and the likelihood of expansion into related markets. There are two types of 15.18 Infringement-Likelihood of Confusion-Factors-Sleekcraft Tests: the ‘likelihood of confusion’ test and the ‘dilution’ test. The former is used to determine if a mark is likely to be confused with another mark used in commerce, while the latter is used to determine if a mark will be weakened or diluted through unauthorized use.

How to fill out 15.18 Infringement-Likelihood Of Confusion-Factors-Sleekcraft Test?

Preparing official paperwork can be a real stress if you don’t have ready-to-use fillable templates. With the US Legal Forms online library of formal documentation, you can be certain in the blanks you obtain, as all of them correspond with federal and state regulations and are examined by our experts. So if you need to prepare 15.18 Infringement-Likelihood of Confusion-Factors-Sleekcraft Test, our service is the perfect place to download it.

Getting your 15.18 Infringement-Likelihood of Confusion-Factors-Sleekcraft Test from our library is as simple as ABC. Previously registered users with a valid subscription need only sign in and click the Download button after they locate the proper template. Later, if they need to, users can use the same document from the My Forms tab of their profile. However, even if you are new to our service, signing up with a valid subscription will take only a few minutes. Here’s a quick guide for you:

  1. Document compliance check. You should attentively review the content of the form you want and check whether it suits your needs and complies with your state law requirements. Previewing your document and looking through its general description will help you do just that.
  2. Alternative search (optional). If there are any inconsistencies, browse the library using the Search tab on the top of the page until you find an appropriate blank, and click Buy Now when you see the one you need.
  3. Account registration and form purchase. Create an account with US Legal Forms. After account verification, log in and choose your preferred subscription plan. Make a payment to proceed (PayPal and credit card options are available).
  4. Template download and further usage. Select the file format for your 15.18 Infringement-Likelihood of Confusion-Factors-Sleekcraft Test and click Download to save it on your device. Print it to complete your papers manually, or take advantage of a multi-featured online editor to prepare an electronic copy faster and more effectively.

Haven’t you tried US Legal Forms yet? Subscribe to our service today to obtain any official document quickly and easily whenever you need to, and keep your paperwork in order!

Form popularity

FAQ

The eight factors articulated by the Ninth Circuit to be weighed in determining the likelihood of consumer confusion in trademark-infringement cases: (1) the strength of the mark, (2) the proximity of the goods, (3) the similarity of the marks, (4) evidence of actual confusion, (5) the marketing channels used to

"Likelihood of confusion" the strength of the trademark owner's mark; the degree of similarity between the trademark owner's mark and the allegedly infringing mark; evidence of actual consumer confusion; the marketing channels used;

These factors include the strength of the mark, the proximity of the goods, the similarity of the marks, evidence of actual confusion, the marketing channels used, the types of goods, the degree of care likely to be exercised by the purchaser, the defendant's intent in selecting the allegedly infringing mark and the

The Lapp test is the standard used to determine whether a likelihood of confusion exists between two trademarks. Under the Lanham Act, liability for trademark infringement is essentially based on a finding that the use of one trademark causes a likelihood of confusion with another previously established trademark.

(15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1) and 1125(a)) You must consider whether the defendant's use of the trademark is likely to cause confusion about the source of the plaintiff's or the defendant's goods.

For example, in the Second Circuit, a court considers the Polaroid Factors: ?(1) the strength of the plaintiff's mark; (2) the degree of similarity between the two marks; (3) the proximity of the products; (4) the likelihood that the owner will bridge the gap; (5) evidence of actual confusion; (6) defendant's good

The eight factors articulated by the Ninth Circuit to be weighed in determining the likelihood of consumer confusion in trademark-infringement cases: (1) the strength of the mark, (2) the proximity of the goods, (3) the similarity of the marks, (4) evidence of actual confusion, (5) the marketing channels used to

§ 1125(a), the plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) it has a valid and legally protectable mark; (2) it owns the mark; and (3) the defendant's use of the mark to identify goods or services causes a likelihood of confusion.

More info

This page sets out the 8 Sleekcraft factors and explains their impact on a trademark infringement determination. 18 (Infringement—Likelihood of Confusion—Factors—Sleekcraft Test).Sleekcraft, 599 F.2d at 348. 49. Trademark infringement, the hallmark of which is the. "likelihood of confusion" analysis, is determined in the 9th U.S.. TRADMARK: 15. 18 Infringement—Likelihood of Confusion—Factors—Sleekcraft Test (2017, d. AMF uses the mark Slickcraft, and Nescher uses Sleekcraft. Get free access to the complete judgment in Eko Brands, LLC v. 15.18 Infringement—Likelihood of Confusion—Factors—Sleekcraft Test.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

15.18 Infringement-Likelihood of Confusion-Factors-Sleekcraft Test