7.11 Continuing Deliberations After Juror Is Discharged and Not Replaced is a procedure in which a jury is allowed to continue its deliberations without replacing a juror who has been discharged. This is allowed in some jurisdictions when there are extenuating circumstances that prevent the court from replacing the discharged juror. There are two types of situations in which this procedure may be used: 1) when the discharged juror is replaced by an alternate and the remaining jurors continue deliberations, or 2) when no alternate is available and the remaining jurors continue deliberations. In both situations, the jury must reach their verdict with 11 jurors or fewer. This procedure helps to ensure that the rights of all parties involved are respected and that the jurors are not forced to make any hasty decisions.
7.11 Continuing Deliberations After Juror Is Discharged and Not Replaced is a procedure in which a jury is allowed to continue its deliberations without replacing a juror who has been discharged. This is allowed in some jurisdictions when there are extenuating circumstances that prevent the court from replacing the discharged juror. There are two types of situations in which this procedure may be used: 1) when the discharged juror is replaced by an alternate and the remaining jurors continue deliberations, or 2) when no alternate is available and the remaining jurors continue deliberations. In both situations, the jury must reach their verdict with 11 jurors or fewer. This procedure helps to ensure that the rights of all parties involved are respected and that the jurors are not forced to make any hasty decisions.