Sample Jury Instructions from the 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals. http://www3.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/
The 9.13 Lacey Act-Defendant Should Have Known That Fish, Wildlife or Plants Were Illegally Taken is a provision of the Lacey Act, which is a federal law that prohibits the trade of illegally taken wildlife, fish, and plants. It applies to any person who has knowledge that a fish, wildlife, or plant has been taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any federal, state, tribal, or foreign law, rule, or regulation. This provision requires that the defendant should have known that the fish, wildlife, or plants were illegally taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of the law. There are two types of 9.13 Lacey Act-Defendant Should Have Known That Fish, Wildlife or Plants Were Illegally Taken. The first type is when the defendant has actual knowledge that the fish, wildlife, or plants were illegally taken, possessed, transported, or sold. The second type is when the defendant should have known that the fish, wildlife, or plants were illegally taken, possessed, transported, or sold, due to facts that were available to the defendant.
The 9.13 Lacey Act-Defendant Should Have Known That Fish, Wildlife or Plants Were Illegally Taken is a provision of the Lacey Act, which is a federal law that prohibits the trade of illegally taken wildlife, fish, and plants. It applies to any person who has knowledge that a fish, wildlife, or plant has been taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any federal, state, tribal, or foreign law, rule, or regulation. This provision requires that the defendant should have known that the fish, wildlife, or plants were illegally taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of the law. There are two types of 9.13 Lacey Act-Defendant Should Have Known That Fish, Wildlife or Plants Were Illegally Taken. The first type is when the defendant has actual knowledge that the fish, wildlife, or plants were illegally taken, possessed, transported, or sold. The second type is when the defendant should have known that the fish, wildlife, or plants were illegally taken, possessed, transported, or sold, due to facts that were available to the defendant.