9.22 Particular Rights-Fourth Amendment-Unreasonable Search-Exception to Warrant Requirement-Terry Frisk

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-JURY-9THCIR-9-22
Format:
Rich Text
Instant download
This website is not affiliated with any governmental entity
Public form

Description

Sample Jury Instructions from the 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals. http://www3.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/

9.22 Particular Rights-Fourth Amendment-Unreasonable Search-Exception to Warrant Requirement-Terry Frisk is an exception to the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of a warrant for a search. This exception allows law enforcement officers to perform a limited search of a person for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous. This type of search, known as a Terry Frisk, is typically conducted without a warrant in order to protect the safety of the officer and others. In the United States, this type of search is subject to the protection of the Fourth Amendment, which requires that it be reasonable under the circumstances. The Supreme Court has held that a Terry Frisk must be limited in scope and cannot be used as a general search.

How to fill out 9.22 Particular Rights-Fourth Amendment-Unreasonable Search-Exception To Warrant Requirement-Terry Frisk?

US Legal Forms is the most simple and affordable way to find suitable legal templates. It’s the most extensive web-based library of business and individual legal paperwork drafted and verified by legal professionals. Here, you can find printable and fillable templates that comply with national and local laws - just like your 9.22 Particular Rights-Fourth Amendment-Unreasonable Search-Exception to Warrant Requirement-Terry Frisk.

Obtaining your template takes only a few simple steps. Users that already have an account with a valid subscription only need to log in to the website and download the document on their device. Later, they can find it in their profile in the My Forms tab.

And here’s how you can obtain a professionally drafted 9.22 Particular Rights-Fourth Amendment-Unreasonable Search-Exception to Warrant Requirement-Terry Frisk if you are using US Legal Forms for the first time:

  1. Look at the form description or preview the document to make sure you’ve found the one meeting your needs, or find another one utilizing the search tab above.
  2. Click Buy now when you’re sure of its compatibility with all the requirements, and choose the subscription plan you like most.
  3. Register for an account with our service, sign in, and purchase your subscription using PayPal or you credit card.
  4. Select the preferred file format for your 9.22 Particular Rights-Fourth Amendment-Unreasonable Search-Exception to Warrant Requirement-Terry Frisk and save it on your device with the appropriate button.

Once you save a template, you can reaccess it at any time - just find it in your profile, re-download it for printing and manual completion or upload it to an online editor to fill it out and sign more efficiently.

Take advantage of US Legal Forms, your reliable assistant in obtaining the corresponding official paperwork. Give it a try!

Form popularity

FAQ

A seizure of a person, within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, occurs when the police's conduct would communicate to a reasonable person, taking into account the circumstances surrounding the encounter, that the person is not free to ignore the police presence and leave at his will.

In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court rules that 'stop and frisk' fell under the fourth amendment decrees in that citizens have a right to walk freely without being stopped by the police.

Stop and frisk law must be based on more than whimsy but less than probable cause; it must be based on (1) reasonable suspicion, (2) good cause to believe, and (3) articulable suspicion. In Terry v.

Overview. A stop-and-frisk refers to a brief non-intrusive police stop of a suspect. The Fourth Amendment requires that before stopping the suspect, the police must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed by the suspect.

The case of Terry v. Ohio is the seminal case handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court, which permits police to stop and question persons upon reasonable suspicion that the suspects might be engaged or about to be engaged in the commission of crime.

Like we wrote about previously, a search and seizure allows police officers to examine your vehicle or residence for evidence, illegal weapons, or controlled substances. In comparison, a frisk only lets officers pat down someone in order to detect weapons like guns or knives.

Field Example: An officer / agent has valid reasonable suspicion to conduct a stop and frisk. The officer pats the suspect down and feels a small box like item in a pocket. The officer / agent seizes the box which turns out to be a cardboard flip-top box of cigarettes.

More info

Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Terry held that a stop-and-frisk must comply with the Fourth Amendment, meaning that the stop-and-frisk cannot be unreasonable.The Supreme Court has ruled that warrantless police searches may comply with the Fourth Amendment so long as it is reasonable under the circumstances.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

9.22 Particular Rights-Fourth Amendment-Unreasonable Search-Exception to Warrant Requirement-Terry Frisk