This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
Utah Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.1 Corporation As Alter Ego Of Stockholder Utah Jury Instruction 1.9.5.1 addresses the legal concept of a corporation being considered the "alter ego" of its stockholder(s). When individuals form a corporation, they often aim to separate their personal liabilities from those of the corporation. However, situations may arise where a court may "pierce the corporate veil" and hold stockholders personally liable for the corporation's debts or actions. This jury instruction helps the jury understand the circumstances under which this legal principle applies. Keywords: Utah, jury instruction, 1.9.5.1, corporation, alter ego, stockholder, legal concept, separate liabilities, personal liabilities, pierce the corporate veil, debts, actions. Types of Utah Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.1 Corporation As Alter Ego Of Stockholder: 1. Basic Instruction: This type of instruction provides a general overview of the legal principle of a corporation as the alter ego of its stockholders. It explains the concept, its purpose, and the circumstances under which a court may consider stockholders personally liable for the corporation's obligations. 2. Factors for Alter Ego Determination: This instruction outlines specific factors the jury should consider when determining whether the corporation acts as the alter ego of its stockholder(s). These factors often include inadequate capitalization, disregard of corporate formalities, commingling of assets, and using the corporation as a mere façade or instrumentality for personal business. 3. Permissible Consequences: This instruction elucidates the potential consequences if the jury determines that the corporation is the alter ego of its stockholder(s). It may detail the remedies available to the plaintiff, such as holding the stockholders personally liable for the corporation's debts, lifting the corporate veil, and allowing the plaintiff to access the stockholders' personal assets. 4. Comparative Negligence: In some cases, the stockholder(s) may allege that the plaintiff's own actions contributed to the corporation's liability, modifying the concept of alter ego. This instruction advises the jury on how to evaluate comparative negligence and proportionately allocate responsibility between the stockholder(s) and the plaintiff. 5. Burden of Proof: This instruction clarifies the burden of proof applicable to the altar ego claim. It explains whether the burden lies with the plaintiff to demonstrate that the corporation is an alter ego, or if the defendant stockholder(s) must disprove it. It's essential to consult the official Utah jury instructions for the most accurate and up-to-date information on Utah Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.1 Corporation As Alter Ego Of Stockholder, as these instructions may vary over time.
Utah Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.1 Corporation As Alter Ego Of Stockholder Utah Jury Instruction 1.9.5.1 addresses the legal concept of a corporation being considered the "alter ego" of its stockholder(s). When individuals form a corporation, they often aim to separate their personal liabilities from those of the corporation. However, situations may arise where a court may "pierce the corporate veil" and hold stockholders personally liable for the corporation's debts or actions. This jury instruction helps the jury understand the circumstances under which this legal principle applies. Keywords: Utah, jury instruction, 1.9.5.1, corporation, alter ego, stockholder, legal concept, separate liabilities, personal liabilities, pierce the corporate veil, debts, actions. Types of Utah Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.1 Corporation As Alter Ego Of Stockholder: 1. Basic Instruction: This type of instruction provides a general overview of the legal principle of a corporation as the alter ego of its stockholders. It explains the concept, its purpose, and the circumstances under which a court may consider stockholders personally liable for the corporation's obligations. 2. Factors for Alter Ego Determination: This instruction outlines specific factors the jury should consider when determining whether the corporation acts as the alter ego of its stockholder(s). These factors often include inadequate capitalization, disregard of corporate formalities, commingling of assets, and using the corporation as a mere façade or instrumentality for personal business. 3. Permissible Consequences: This instruction elucidates the potential consequences if the jury determines that the corporation is the alter ego of its stockholder(s). It may detail the remedies available to the plaintiff, such as holding the stockholders personally liable for the corporation's debts, lifting the corporate veil, and allowing the plaintiff to access the stockholders' personal assets. 4. Comparative Negligence: In some cases, the stockholder(s) may allege that the plaintiff's own actions contributed to the corporation's liability, modifying the concept of alter ego. This instruction advises the jury on how to evaluate comparative negligence and proportionately allocate responsibility between the stockholder(s) and the plaintiff. 5. Burden of Proof: This instruction clarifies the burden of proof applicable to the altar ego claim. It explains whether the burden lies with the plaintiff to demonstrate that the corporation is an alter ego, or if the defendant stockholder(s) must disprove it. It's essential to consult the official Utah jury instructions for the most accurate and up-to-date information on Utah Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.1 Corporation As Alter Ego Of Stockholder, as these instructions may vary over time.