Utah Jury Instruction — 2.2.3.2 Convicted Prisoner Alleging Deliberate Indifference To Serious Medical Need provides guidance to the jury when a convicted prisoner claims deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. This instruction is crucial in ensuring a fair evaluation of such claims and determining the appropriate course of action. The primary purpose of this jury instruction is to educate the jury on the legal standards surrounding deliberate indifference to a serious medical need by prison officials. It aims to outline the elements necessary to establish this claim and guide jurors on how to interpret the evidence presented during the trial. By providing clear instructions, it helps ensure a consistent approach to resolving cases involving this issue in the Utah court system. Keywords: Utah, jury instruction, convicted prisoner, deliberate indifference, serious medical need, legal standards, elements, evidence, trial, Utah court system. Different types of Utah Jury Instruction — 2.2.3.2 Convicted Prisoner Alleging Deliberate Indifference To Serious Medical Need may include: 1. Standard Instruction: This type of instruction offers a comprehensive overview of the legal principles associated with a convicted prisoner's claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. It presents the essential elements the plaintiff must prove to establish their case and the legal standards the jury should apply during deliberations. 2. Modified Instruction: In some cases, the court may modify the standard instruction to better fit the specific circumstances of the case. Modifications could be made based on factors such as the nature of the medical need, the alleged conduct of the prison officials, or any unique elements that require additional clarification. 3. Supplementary Instruction: This category includes additional instructions that can be provided in conjunction with the main instruction to address specific issues or provide further guidance to the jury. These supplementary instructions may delve deeper into particular legal concepts or offer further explanations regarding the burden of proof or the role of the jury in reaching a verdict. 4. Instruction for Different Levels of Intention: Depending on the specific circumstances, the court may provide different versions of the instruction to address varying levels of intentional conduct by prison officials. This could include instructions for cases where deliberate indifference or gross negligence is alleged, each carrying different legal implications and standards of proof. By utilizing these different types of instructions, the court can accurately guide the jury in cases where convicted prisoners allege deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, ensuring the fair adjudication of such claims in Utah's legal system.