Virgin Islands Jury Instruction — 2.1 With Defenses Of Misuse And Assumption Of Risk is a legal instruction given to the jury in civil cases in the Virgin Islands. This instruction provides guidance to the jury on how to consider the defenses of misuse and assumption of risk in determining liability. The defense of misuse refers to the plaintiff's actions or behavior that may have contributed to their own injuries. It involves demonstrating that the plaintiff used the product or engaged in an activity in a manner that was not intended or reasonably foreseeable by the defendant. The instruction advises the jury to carefully evaluate the evidence presented and determine whether the plaintiff's actions were a substantial factor contributing to their injuries. If the jury finds that the plaintiff's misuse of the product or engagement in the activity was a substantial factor, it may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability. The defense of assumption of risk, on the other hand, involves showing that the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily assumed the risks associated with a particular activity or product. The instruction directs the jury to assess whether the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the specific risks involved and whether they voluntarily accepted those risks. If the jury finds that the plaintiff assumed the risk, it may impact the defendant's liability by partially or completely absolving them of responsibility. It is important to note that there may be different versions or variations of the Virgin Islands Jury Instruction — 2.1 With Defenses Of Misuse And Assumption Of Risk, tailored to specific circumstances or types of cases. For instance, there may be variations that apply to product liability cases, personal injury cases, or specific industries such as recreational activities, medical procedures, or workplace accidents. When considering this instruction, the jury must carefully review the evidence and arguments presented during the trial and apply the law as instructed by the judge. It is their responsibility to assess whether the defenses of misuse and assumption of risk are relevant and applicable to the case at hand.