Keywords: Washington Jury Instruction 7.1, duty to deliberate, plaintiff claims damages, different types Description: Washington Jury Instruction 7.1 deals with the duty of jurors to deliberate when only the plaintiff claims damages in a legal case. This instruction is crucial in ensuring a fair and thorough examination of the evidence presented during the trial. Jurors are expected to fulfill their responsibility by carefully considering the information, facts, and arguments put forward by both the plaintiff and defense. The purpose of Washington Jury Instruction 7.1 is to emphasize that even if there is only one party seeking damages, jurors must still engage in deliberations and reach a verdict that is guided by the evidence. Their role is not simply to accept the plaintiff's claims at face value, but to actively evaluate the credibility and weight of the evidence presented. This instruction serves to remind jurors that their duty is to assess the entire case impartially, regardless of whether the defendant has made counterclaims or not. It safeguards against biases or preconceived notions that may arise due to the absence of competing damage claims. While Washington Jury Instruction 7.1 may not have specific variations or subtypes, its application may differ depending on the nature of the case. Whether it involves personal injury, property damage, or other types of claims, this instruction remains relevant in all cases where only the plaintiff claims damages. Different elements and evidence pertaining to the specific case will be presented to the jury, but their duty to deliberate remains constant. In summary, Washington Jury Instruction 7.1 emphasizes the vital role of jurors in deliberating and reaching an unbiased decision when only the plaintiff claims damages. It ensures that jurors examine the evidence objectively and do not solely rely on the plaintiff's assertions. By following this instruction, jurors contribute to a fair and just legal process.