Washington Jury Instruction — 1.1.1 Public Employee First Amendment Claim Discharge — Failure To Promote Free Speech On Matter Of Public Concern The Washington Jury Instruction — 1.1.1 deals with public employee first amendment claim discharge cases, specifically focusing on the failure to promote free speech on a matter of public concern. This instruction serves as a guideline for jury members in such cases, outlining the key elements, legal standards, and considerations that should be taken into account. Keyword: Washington Jury Instruction — 1.1.1, Public Employee, First Amendment Claim, Discharge, Failure to Promote Free Speech, Matter of Public Concern. Types of Washington Jury Instruction — 1.1.1 Public Employee First Amendment Claim Discharge — Failure To Promote Free Speech On Matter Of Public Concern: 1. Elements of the Claim: This section of the instruction explains the necessary elements that need to be established to prove a public employee's first amendment claim discharge. These elements typically include the employee's speech being of public concern, the employer's failure to promote the speech, and the discharge being a result of the failure. 2. Public Concern Requirement: This portion of the instruction delves into the concept of public concern and its significance in determining whether the employee's speech is protected under the First Amendment. It provides guidance on how to differentiate matters of public concern from those pertaining to private interests. 3. Failure to Promote Free Speech: This section focuses on the employer's obligation to promote free speech rights for public employees. It explains that the failure to promote speech can create a cause of action if it directly leads to the employee's discharge and is based on the content of the speech rather than legitimate business reasons. 4. Causal Connection: The Washington Jury Instruction acknowledges the need to establish a causal connection between the employer's failure to promote free speech and the employee's discharge. It provides guidelines for evaluating whether the failure to promote directly contributed to the discharge. 5. Protected Speech Scope: This part of the instruction outlines the scope of protected speech for public employees. It clarifies that not all speech is protected, especially if it relates solely to personal grievances or is disruptive to the workplace. 6. Employer's Justification: The instruction also recognizes that an employer may have legitimate justifications for not promoting or acting upon an employee's speech on matters of public concern. It instructs the jury to consider these justifications when evaluating the claims. It is important to consult the specific Washington Jury Instruction — 1.1.1 for the accurate and complete guidelines regarding public employee first amendment claim discharge involving the failure to promote free speech on matters of public concern.