Washington Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1 is a legal instruction designed for cases involving per se violation conspiracy to fix prices. This instruction serves as a guide for the jury in understanding and applying the relevant legal standards while reaching a verdict. The first component of this instruction defines the concept of per se violation conspiracy to fix prices. It outlines that this type of conspiracy occurs when two or more individuals or entities agree to fix prices in a manner that restrains free trade and competition. It emphasizes that such agreements are deemed illegal without further examination or consideration of justifications. The instruction also includes an alternative rule of reason instruction. In certain cases, the court may allow defendants to present evidence and arguments to show that their agreement to fix prices, although it may appear anti-competitive at first, has legitimate business justifications and does not unreasonably restrain trade. This alternative rule of reason instruction provides defendants an opportunity to argue their case and potentially avoid liability based on the context and evidence presented. Different types of Washington Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy to fix prices — Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction, may exist based on specific contexts or modifications made by the court. For example, there could be variations in the language used to explain the rule of reason instruction, depending on the specific circumstances of the case. Additionally, the instruction may undergo updates and revisions over time to reflect changes in legal standards or precedent. Overall, Washington Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1 provides essential guidance for both the jury and the parties involved in a case related to per se violation conspiracy to fix prices. It ensures a fair and informed assessment of the evidence presented and allows the potential consideration of alternative justifications through the rule of reason approach.