A Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (NOV), or in the Alternative, for a New Trial can be filed in Washington state when prejudicial statements are made during a trial that may have influenced the jury's decision. This motion aims to challenge the outcome of a trial based on the notion that the statements unfairly impacted the jury's ability to make an impartial judgment. In Washington, there are two types of motions that can be filed to address prejudicial statements: 1. Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict: This type of motion challenges the final judgment, disregarding the jury's decision, and seeks a judgment in favor of the party filing the motion. It is typically argued when the evidence presented in the trial did not support the jury's verdict or when legal errors occurred during the trial that affected the outcome. 2. Motion for a New Trial: This motion seeks a retrial of the case, arguing that the prejudicial statements made during the trial unfairly prejudiced the jury and influenced their verdict. It can be based on both legal errors and statements made by witnesses or opposing counsel that may have inflamed the jury's emotions or tainted their ability to make an impartial decision. When filing a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial — for prejudicial statements at trial in Washington, several essential factors need to be considered. Firstly, the motion should present a detailed account of the prejudicial statement or statements made during the trial. It should explain how these statements operated to deprive the party filing the motion of a fair trial. Additionally, it is critical to outline the legal and factual grounds supporting the motion, including any applicable statutes or case law. The party filing the motion must explain how these prejudicial statements violated legal standards and affected the fairness of the trial, possibly leading to an erroneous verdict. To strengthen the motion, relevant supporting evidence such as transcripts or recordings of the trial should be attached. Witness statements or affidavits attesting to the prejudicial nature of the statements can also be included to further emphasize the impact on the jury's decision-making process. Lastly, the motion should propose the desired relief, either requesting a judgment in favor of the party filing the motion or a new trial. It should also provide a persuasive argument justifying why the requested relief is appropriate in light of the prejudicial statements' significance. In summary, a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial can be filed in Washington when prejudicial statements at trial have affected the fairness of the proceeding. By properly addressing the prejudicial statements, providing legal and factual grounds, supporting evidence, and proposing the appropriate relief, the party filing the motion can seek to overturn the verdict or obtain a new trial.