Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Duces Tecum

• Category: Civil Procedure - Motions - Samples
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-PI-0042
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form is a sample motion used in an attempt to quash a deposition subpoena duces tecum. A Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal document filed with a court to challenge or block the enforcement of a deposition subpoena that requires the production of documents or tangible things. This motion seeks to protect the rights of a party being deposed by preventing the opposing party from obtaining certain documents or items. Keywords: Washington, motion to quash, deposition subpoena, duces tecum, legal document, challenge, block, enforcement, production, protect, party, deposed, opposing party, documents, tangible things. There are different types of Washington Motions to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum, depending on the specific circumstances and legal arguments being made. Some possible variations include: 1. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum on Grounds of Privilege: This motion is filed when the party believes that the requested documents or items are privileged information protected by attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or other applicable privileges. 2. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum for Over breadth: This motion is filed when the subpoena seeks to obtain a broad range of documents or items that are not relevant or proportional to the issues in the case. It argues that the subpoena is overly burdensome, oppressive, or seeks irrelevant or unreasonable information. 3. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum based on Lack of Relevance: This motion challenges the subpoena by asserting that the requested documents or items are not relevant to the claims or defenses in the case. It argues that the information sought does not have any bearing on the issues being litigated. 4. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum for Defects in Service: This motion is filed when the party believes that the subpoena was not properly served or fails to comply with the procedural requirements set forth in the Washington Rules of Civil Procedure. It asserts that the subpoena should be quashed due to improper delivery or lack of proper notice. 5. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum due to Undue Burden: This motion asserts that complying with the subpoena would pose an undue burden or hardship on the producing party. It argues that the cost, time, or effort required to gather and produce the requested documents or items outweighs the potential benefits or relevance to the case. Note: It is essential to consult with an attorney or legal professional to understand the specific requirements and considerations of filing a Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum, as legal procedures can vary and require case-specific analysis.

A Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal document filed with a court to challenge or block the enforcement of a deposition subpoena that requires the production of documents or tangible things. This motion seeks to protect the rights of a party being deposed by preventing the opposing party from obtaining certain documents or items. Keywords: Washington, motion to quash, deposition subpoena, duces tecum, legal document, challenge, block, enforcement, production, protect, party, deposed, opposing party, documents, tangible things. There are different types of Washington Motions to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum, depending on the specific circumstances and legal arguments being made. Some possible variations include: 1. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum on Grounds of Privilege: This motion is filed when the party believes that the requested documents or items are privileged information protected by attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or other applicable privileges. 2. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum for Over breadth: This motion is filed when the subpoena seeks to obtain a broad range of documents or items that are not relevant or proportional to the issues in the case. It argues that the subpoena is overly burdensome, oppressive, or seeks irrelevant or unreasonable information. 3. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum based on Lack of Relevance: This motion challenges the subpoena by asserting that the requested documents or items are not relevant to the claims or defenses in the case. It argues that the information sought does not have any bearing on the issues being litigated. 4. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum for Defects in Service: This motion is filed when the party believes that the subpoena was not properly served or fails to comply with the procedural requirements set forth in the Washington Rules of Civil Procedure. It asserts that the subpoena should be quashed due to improper delivery or lack of proper notice. 5. Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum due to Undue Burden: This motion asserts that complying with the subpoena would pose an undue burden or hardship on the producing party. It argues that the cost, time, or effort required to gather and produce the requested documents or items outweighs the potential benefits or relevance to the case. Note: It is essential to consult with an attorney or legal professional to understand the specific requirements and considerations of filing a Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum, as legal procedures can vary and require case-specific analysis.