Wisconsin Summary Judgment Procedure in Cases Assigned to Judge William M. Conley is a procedure that allows the parties involved in a case to present evidence and arguments to the court in order to determine whether a case can be decided without a trial. This procedure is used to determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact to be tried and whether a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The parties in a case must present a motion for summary judgment which contains a statement of the material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried. The non-moving party must also submit an affidavit or other documentary evidence in support of its position. After both sides have presented their evidence, the court will review the evidence and make a decision regarding whether there are any genuine issues of material fact in dispute. If there are, then the case will proceed to a full trial. If there are not, then the court may grant summary judgment in favor of the moving party. There are two types of summary judgment procedure in cases assigned to Judge William M. Conley: Rule 56 motions, which are motions brought under the Wisconsin Rules of Civil Procedure, and discretionary motions, which are motions brought under the court’s discretion. Both types of summary judgment motions require the parties to present evidence and arguments to the court in order to demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact in the case.