This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is an important legal concept used in civil cases to determine liability and damages when multiple parties are at fault for an incident. This instruction helps the jury understand and apply the principles of comparative negligence when determining compensation for the plaintiff. In Wisconsin, there are three types of Comparative Negligence Instructions that may be applicable depending on the case: 1. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 1.1: Standard Comparative Negligence: This instruction explains the basic principles of comparative negligence, where damages are apportioned based on the percentage of fault assigned to each party involved in the incident. It provides guidelines for the jury to evaluate the degree of negligence of both the plaintiff and the defendant and assign appropriate percentages of fault. 2. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 1.1A: Claimant's Comparative Negligence: This instruction is used when the plaintiff is partially at fault for the incident. It guides the jury to determine the degree of negligence of the claimant and the defendant separately. In such cases, the damages awarded to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to them. 3. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 1.1B: Defendant's Comparative Negligence: This instruction is employed when the defendant alleges that the plaintiff was at least partially responsible for the incident. It instructs the jury to determine the degree of negligence of both the plaintiff and the defendant separately. If the jury finds that the plaintiff was also negligent, the damages awarded to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to them. The purpose of these instructions is to ensure fairness and the proper apportionment of damages based on the degree of fault assigned to each party. By understanding and following these instructions, juries can make informed decisions in civil cases involving multiple negligent parties. Keywords: Wisconsin Jury Instruction, Comparative Negligence Defense, liability, damages, civil cases, multiple parties, incident, principles, compensation, plaintiff, fault, apportionment, percentage, standard comparative negligence, claimant's comparative negligence, defendant's comparative negligence, degree of negligence, fairness, juries, informed decisions.
Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is an important legal concept used in civil cases to determine liability and damages when multiple parties are at fault for an incident. This instruction helps the jury understand and apply the principles of comparative negligence when determining compensation for the plaintiff. In Wisconsin, there are three types of Comparative Negligence Instructions that may be applicable depending on the case: 1. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 1.1: Standard Comparative Negligence: This instruction explains the basic principles of comparative negligence, where damages are apportioned based on the percentage of fault assigned to each party involved in the incident. It provides guidelines for the jury to evaluate the degree of negligence of both the plaintiff and the defendant and assign appropriate percentages of fault. 2. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 1.1A: Claimant's Comparative Negligence: This instruction is used when the plaintiff is partially at fault for the incident. It guides the jury to determine the degree of negligence of the claimant and the defendant separately. In such cases, the damages awarded to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to them. 3. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 1.1B: Defendant's Comparative Negligence: This instruction is employed when the defendant alleges that the plaintiff was at least partially responsible for the incident. It instructs the jury to determine the degree of negligence of both the plaintiff and the defendant separately. If the jury finds that the plaintiff was also negligent, the damages awarded to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to them. The purpose of these instructions is to ensure fairness and the proper apportionment of damages based on the degree of fault assigned to each party. By understanding and following these instructions, juries can make informed decisions in civil cases involving multiple negligent parties. Keywords: Wisconsin Jury Instruction, Comparative Negligence Defense, liability, damages, civil cases, multiple parties, incident, principles, compensation, plaintiff, fault, apportionment, percentage, standard comparative negligence, claimant's comparative negligence, defendant's comparative negligence, degree of negligence, fairness, juries, informed decisions.