Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 3.2 Civil Theft: A Detailed Description Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 3.2 Civil Theft is a set of guidelines provided to juries in civil cases involving theft-related allegations. It outlines and explains the legal principles that need to be considered when determining liability and damages in such cases. These instructions help juries make informed decisions based on the evidence presented during trial. Keywords: Wisconsin, Jury Instruction, 3.2, Civil Theft, guidelines, juries, civil cases, theft-related allegations, liability, damages, evidence, trial. Different Types of Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 3.2 Civil Theft: 1. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 3.2a CiviTheef— – Definition and Elements: This instruction defines civil theft and outlines the elements required to establish a claim. It explains the necessary components that the plaintiff must prove to establish liability for civil theft. 2. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 3.2b CiviTheef— – Burden of Proof: This instruction clarifies the burden of proof in civil theft cases. It explains the plaintiff's responsibility to prove their claim by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning that it is more likely than not that the alleged theft occurred. 3. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 3.2c CiviTheef— – Contributory Negligence: This instruction addresses the issue of contributory negligence in civil theft cases. It guides the jury on determining the extent to which the plaintiff's actions or negligence may have contributed to the theft and how it affects the defendant's liability. 4. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 3.2d CiviTheef— – Damages: This instruction focuses on the calculation and awarding of damages in civil theft cases. It provides guidance on assessing the monetary value of the stolen property or the financial harm caused by the theft. It also considers any additional damages that might be applicable, such as emotional distress or punitive damages. 5. Wisconsin Jury Instruction — 3.2e CiviTheef— – Defenses: This instruction outlines the potential defenses that the defendant may present in a civil theft case. It covers various grounds that the defendant can argue, including lack of intent, mistaken identity, consent, or justification for the alleged theft, aiming to refute the plaintiff's claims. These different types of instructions provide a comprehensive framework for juries to consider when deciding civil theft cases in Wisconsin. By incorporating relevant legal principles and considerations, they assist juries in reaching fair and just verdicts based on the evidence presented during trial.