A motion for trial continuance in Wisconsin pertaining to personal injury cases is a legal request made by one party to delay the scheduled trial date. The primary purpose of this motion is to provide the requesting party with additional time to gather evidence, secure witnesses, or prepare their case more thoroughly. In personal injury cases, a motion for trial continuance may be filed by either the plaintiff or the defendant if they believe that the current trial date does not allow for adequate preparation or if unforeseen circumstances have arisen that hamper their ability to proceed as planned. Potential grounds for filing a Wisconsin motion for trial continuance in personal injury cases may include: 1. Insufficient time for discovery: If either party believes that they require more time to collect evidence, review documents, conduct depositions, or obtain expert opinions crucial to the case, they can request a trial continuance. 2. Medical reasons: If a party or their attorney suffers from an illness, injury, or any other medical condition that renders them temporarily unable to participate effectively in the trial, they can seek a continuance. 3. Unavailability of key witnesses: If essential witnesses are unable to attend the trial due to reasons such as illness, scheduling conflicts, or emergencies, a motion for continuance can be filed to allow time for alternative arrangements. 4. Conflicts with concurrent legal proceedings: If either party or their attorney is involved in another ongoing trial or legal matter that overlaps with the scheduled trial date, they can request a continuance to avoid conflicts and ensure sufficient focus on each case. 5. Settlement negotiations: If parties are actively engaged in settlement discussions and have a reasonable expectation of reaching a resolution before the trial takes place, a motion for continuance can be filed to allow further negotiations. Different types or variations of Wisconsin motions for trial continuance may include emergency motions, ex parte motions, agreed motions, and motions opposed by the opposing party. These types vary depending on the urgency, consent of the parties involved, or whether both parties mutually agree on the need for a continuance. It is crucial to note that the granting or denial of a motion for trial continuance is solely at the discretion of the presiding judge. The moving party must provide compelling reasons and demonstrate good cause for the requested continuance to be approved.