Title: West Virginia Motion to Declare Unconstitutional the Discriminatory Exclusion of Illiterates from the Jury Description: A West Virginia Motion to Declare Unconstitutional the Discriminatory Exclusion of Illiterates from the Jury is a legal action aimed at challenging the practice of excluding illiterate individuals from jury duty during the selection process. This motion asserts that such exclusion is discriminatory and violates the constitutional rights of illiterate citizens in West Virginia. Keywords: West Virginia, motion, declare unconstitutional, discriminatory exclusion, illiterates, jury, legal action, constitutional rights, selection process. Types of West Virginia Motions to Declare Unconstitutional the Discriminatory Exclusion of Illiterates from the Jury: 1. Class Action Motion: A class action motion is designed to represent a larger group of illiterate individuals who have been excluded from jury duty based on their literacy levels. This type of motion brings together affected individuals to challenge the constitutionality of the exclusion in a collective manner. 2. Individual Motion: Individuals who have been recently excluded from jury duty due to their illiteracy are encouraged to file their own motion. An individual motion enables affected citizens to seek judicial review of their exclusion, advocating for the right to participate in the jury selection process on an equal footing. 3. Constitutional Challenge Motion: A constitutional challenge motion is filed at a higher court level, such as the West Virginia Supreme Court, to argue that the practice of excluding illiterate individuals from jury duty is fundamentally unconstitutional. These motions typically present comprehensive legal arguments supported by relevant case law, constitutional principles, and legal precedents. 4. Legislative Reform Motion: In some cases, individuals or organizations may file a motion with the aim of triggering a legislative debate and reform. This type of motion highlights the need for legislative action to address the discriminatory exclusion of illiterates from the jury system, urging lawmakers to amend the relevant laws or statutes accordingly. 5. Precedent-Setting Motion: A precedent-setting motion involves a strategic approach aimed at creating a legal precedent that will impact future cases. By obtaining a favorable court ruling on the unconstitutionality of the exclusion of illiterates from juries, this type of motion seeks to change the legal landscape, influence future decision-making, and bolster the argument for equality and fairness in jury selection processes. Note: It is essential to consult with a legal professional or civil rights organization for specific advice and guidance while drafting and filing any type of motion mentioned above. This description is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.