West Virginia Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue Keyword: West Virginia Jury Instruction Description: West Virginia Jury Instruction — 7.2 deals with the duty of jurors to deliberate and reach a decision when both the plaintiff and the defendant claim damages or when damages are not an issue in a legal case. This instruction guides the jury on their responsibility to carefully consider the evidence and arguments presented by both parties before reaching a verdict. While the duty to deliberate is crucial in any jury trial, this particular instruction focuses on cases where both the plaintiff and the defendant are claiming damages or when the issue of damages is not contested. In such situations, the jury must objectively evaluate the evidence and arguments presented to determine whether damages should be awarded and, if so, the amount of compensation to be granted. There may be different types or variations of West Virginia Jury Instruction — 7.2, depending on the specific circumstances of the case. Some possible variations of this instruction could include: 1. West Virginia Jury Instruction — 7.2(a): Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages — This instruction would apply in cases where both parties are seeking damages from each other. It would outline the jury's duty to consider the claims presented by both sides and assess the credibility of the evidence before making a decision. 2. West Virginia Jury Instruction — 7.2(b): Duty To Deliberate When Damages Are Not an Issue — This instruction would be relevant in cases where the issue of damages is not disputed. It would instruct the jury to focus solely on determining liability and any other relevant issues brought forth in the trial. In both scenarios, the West Virginia Jury Instruction — 7.2 emphasizes the importance of careful deliberation and unbiased consideration of the evidence presented by both parties. The instruction serves to remind the jury of their duty to reach a fair and just verdict based on the facts and law applicable to the case.