West Virginia Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 Race And Or Sex Discrimination Discharge — Failure To PromotIncludingin— - Same Decision Defense is a specific legal instruction provided to juries in West Virginia civil court cases relating to employment discrimination. This instruction addresses situations where an employee alleges that they were terminated or not promoted based on their race and/or sex. The purpose of West Virginia Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 is to guide the jury in understanding the legal framework surrounding race and/or sex discrimination claims in the context of termination or failure to promote. It aims to ensure that the jury is well-informed and able to make an unbiased decision based on the evidence presented during the trial. This particular jury instruction focuses on the "Same Decision Defense" aspect of the case. The Same Decision Defense argues that the employer's decision to discharge or not promote the employee was not based on their race and/or sex, but rather on legitimate non-discriminatory reasons. The instruction lays out the elements the plaintiff (the employee) must prove for their claim to be successful, as well as the elements the defendant (the employer) must prove to establish their Same Decision Defense. These are the key points covered by West Virginia Jury Instruction — 1.2.1: 1. Claim of discrimination: The instruction first explains that the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that they were discharged or not promoted based on their race and/or sex. 2. Elements of the claim: It then outlines the specific elements the plaintiff must prove, which may include demonstrating that they belong to a protected class, that they were qualified for the position, that they suffered an adverse employment action, and that the action was motivated by discrimination. 3. Same Decision Defense: The instruction then states that the defendant may try to establish the Same Decision Defense, which requires providing evidence that the decision was based on legitimate non-discriminatory reasons. The burden of proof shifts to the defendant in this case. 4. Burden of proof: The instruction explains that the plaintiff still bears the ultimate burden of proving their claim by a preponderance of the evidence, even when the Same Decision Defense is raised. It's important to note that the specific content and name of this jury instruction may vary in different jurisdictions, as each state has its own set of instructions and legal standards.