Wyoming Jury Instruction - 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11C-0-1-1
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Wyoming Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense refers to a specific legal instruction given to the jury during a trial regarding personal injury or civil negligence cases in the state of Wyoming. This instruction provides guidance to the jury on how to determine liability and assess damages when multiple parties are found to have contributed to an accident or injury. Keywords: Wyoming jury instruction, 1.1, comparative negligence defense, legal instruction, personal injury, civil negligence, liability, damages, multiple parties, accident. Different types of Wyoming Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense may include: 1. Ordinary Comparative Negligence: This type of comparative negligence defense focuses on the proportionate fault of each party involved in the incident. The jury is instructed to assign a percentage of fault to each party based on their level of negligence. The damages awarded to the injured party are then reduced by their assigned percentage of fault. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Rule): This instruction follows the principle of comparative negligence, but with the added rule that the injured party can only recover damages if their fault does not exceed 50%. If the injured party is found to be equally or more negligent than the defendant, they are barred from recovering any damages. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence (51% Rule): Similar to the 50% rule, this instruction allows the injured party to recover damages as long as their fault is less than 51%. If the injured party's fault reaches or exceeds 51%, they are completely barred from receiving any compensation. 4. Pure Comparative Negligence: This type of comparative negligence defense allows the injured party to recover damages regardless of their degree of fault. However, the damages awarded are reduced by the exact percentage of their assigned fault. 5. Last Clear Chance Doctrine: Although not a type of comparative negligence defense itself, it is important to mention that Wyoming recognizes the Last Clear Chance Doctrine. Under this doctrine, even if the injured party was negligent, they can still recover damages if the defendant had the last opportunity to avoid the accident or injury. In conclusion, Wyoming Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense provides the framework for determining liability and awarding damages in personal injury and civil negligence cases in Wyoming. Various types of comparative negligence defenses can be employed, depending on the circumstances of the case and the specific jury instructions given.

Wyoming Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense refers to a specific legal instruction given to the jury during a trial regarding personal injury or civil negligence cases in the state of Wyoming. This instruction provides guidance to the jury on how to determine liability and assess damages when multiple parties are found to have contributed to an accident or injury. Keywords: Wyoming jury instruction, 1.1, comparative negligence defense, legal instruction, personal injury, civil negligence, liability, damages, multiple parties, accident. Different types of Wyoming Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense may include: 1. Ordinary Comparative Negligence: This type of comparative negligence defense focuses on the proportionate fault of each party involved in the incident. The jury is instructed to assign a percentage of fault to each party based on their level of negligence. The damages awarded to the injured party are then reduced by their assigned percentage of fault. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Rule): This instruction follows the principle of comparative negligence, but with the added rule that the injured party can only recover damages if their fault does not exceed 50%. If the injured party is found to be equally or more negligent than the defendant, they are barred from recovering any damages. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence (51% Rule): Similar to the 50% rule, this instruction allows the injured party to recover damages as long as their fault is less than 51%. If the injured party's fault reaches or exceeds 51%, they are completely barred from receiving any compensation. 4. Pure Comparative Negligence: This type of comparative negligence defense allows the injured party to recover damages regardless of their degree of fault. However, the damages awarded are reduced by the exact percentage of their assigned fault. 5. Last Clear Chance Doctrine: Although not a type of comparative negligence defense itself, it is important to mention that Wyoming recognizes the Last Clear Chance Doctrine. Under this doctrine, even if the injured party was negligent, they can still recover damages if the defendant had the last opportunity to avoid the accident or injury. In conclusion, Wyoming Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense provides the framework for determining liability and awarding damages in personal injury and civil negligence cases in Wyoming. Various types of comparative negligence defenses can be employed, depending on the circumstances of the case and the specific jury instructions given.