This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
Wyoming Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy To Fix Prices — Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction, is a legal guideline provided to the jury in Wyoming when considering cases of price-fixing conspiracies. This instruction provides detailed guidance on how the jury should evaluate whether a defendant has engaged in a per se violation of antitrust laws related to fixing prices. Keywords: Wyoming, jury instruction, 3.3.1, Section 1, per se violation, conspiracy, fix prices, alternative rule of reason instruction, antitrust laws. Description: Wyoming Jury Instruction 3.3.1 Section 1 focuses on the offense of conspiracy to fix prices, which refers to the illegal agreement between two or more parties to manipulate, control, or stabilize prices in a manner that harms competition and consumers. This instruction provides step-by-step guidance to the jury on how to evaluate whether a defendant is guilty of such a per se violation. The instruction begins by explaining the concept of per se violation, which is a legal term indicating that a specific type of anticompetitive behavior is considered inherently illegal, and no further analysis is required. In this case, the per se violation pertains to price-fixing, where the act of conspiring to set prices artificially leads to less competition, higher prices, and harm to consumers. Furthermore, the Wyoming Jury Instruction highlights that there is an alternative rule of reason instruction available to the jury. This instruction suggests that, in some circumstances, the court may require the jury to analyze the defendant's actions under the rule of reason framework rather than categorizing it as a per se violation. The rule of reason framework evaluates the overall effect of the defendant's actions on competition and consumers rather than outright considering it illegal. The jury instruction emphasizes that the burden of proof rests upon the prosecution to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant indeed engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices. It provides the jury with factors they should consider, such as the existence of an agreement, the intent to fix prices, and the effect it has on competition and the market. The jury must carefully assess the evidence presented, including witness testimonies, documents, and any other relevant information, to determine if the prosecution has met this burden. Different variations or types of Wyoming Jury Instruction 3.3.1 Section 1 may exist depending on the specific circumstances of the case or the judge's preferences. However, the general objective remains the same — to inform the jury about the legal standards and requirements for establishing a per se violation of conspiracy to fix prices and the availability of an alternative rule of reason instruction. In conclusion, Wyoming Jury Instruction 3.3.1 Section 1 provides essential guidance to the jury when considering cases involving per se violation conspiracy to fix prices. It educates the jury about the legal standards, burden of proof, and factors they should consider determining the guilt or innocence of the defendant. Whether applying the per se violation or rule of reason framework, the instruction aims to ensure a fair and thorough evaluation of the evidence and a just verdict.
Wyoming Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy To Fix Prices — Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction, is a legal guideline provided to the jury in Wyoming when considering cases of price-fixing conspiracies. This instruction provides detailed guidance on how the jury should evaluate whether a defendant has engaged in a per se violation of antitrust laws related to fixing prices. Keywords: Wyoming, jury instruction, 3.3.1, Section 1, per se violation, conspiracy, fix prices, alternative rule of reason instruction, antitrust laws. Description: Wyoming Jury Instruction 3.3.1 Section 1 focuses on the offense of conspiracy to fix prices, which refers to the illegal agreement between two or more parties to manipulate, control, or stabilize prices in a manner that harms competition and consumers. This instruction provides step-by-step guidance to the jury on how to evaluate whether a defendant is guilty of such a per se violation. The instruction begins by explaining the concept of per se violation, which is a legal term indicating that a specific type of anticompetitive behavior is considered inherently illegal, and no further analysis is required. In this case, the per se violation pertains to price-fixing, where the act of conspiring to set prices artificially leads to less competition, higher prices, and harm to consumers. Furthermore, the Wyoming Jury Instruction highlights that there is an alternative rule of reason instruction available to the jury. This instruction suggests that, in some circumstances, the court may require the jury to analyze the defendant's actions under the rule of reason framework rather than categorizing it as a per se violation. The rule of reason framework evaluates the overall effect of the defendant's actions on competition and consumers rather than outright considering it illegal. The jury instruction emphasizes that the burden of proof rests upon the prosecution to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant indeed engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices. It provides the jury with factors they should consider, such as the existence of an agreement, the intent to fix prices, and the effect it has on competition and the market. The jury must carefully assess the evidence presented, including witness testimonies, documents, and any other relevant information, to determine if the prosecution has met this burden. Different variations or types of Wyoming Jury Instruction 3.3.1 Section 1 may exist depending on the specific circumstances of the case or the judge's preferences. However, the general objective remains the same — to inform the jury about the legal standards and requirements for establishing a per se violation of conspiracy to fix prices and the availability of an alternative rule of reason instruction. In conclusion, Wyoming Jury Instruction 3.3.1 Section 1 provides essential guidance to the jury when considering cases involving per se violation conspiracy to fix prices. It educates the jury about the legal standards, burden of proof, and factors they should consider determining the guilt or innocence of the defendant. Whether applying the per se violation or rule of reason framework, the instruction aims to ensure a fair and thorough evaluation of the evidence and a just verdict.