Wyoming Jury Instruction - 6.6.1 General Instruction - Comparative Negligence Defense

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CF-6-6-1
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Wyoming Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal instruction provided to the jury in Wyoming courts when considering cases involving negligence. This instruction outlines the concept of comparative negligence, which allows the jury to assign percentages of fault to each party involved in causing the plaintiff's injuries or damages. The purpose of this instruction is to guide the jury in determining the degree of negligence exhibited by both the plaintiff and the defendant and how it affects the liability and potential damages in the case. By understanding the principles of comparative negligence, the jury can make a fair and equitable decision based on the evidence presented during the trial. In Wyoming, there are two main types of comparative negligence instructions that may be provided to the jury, depending on the circumstances of the case: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: This instruction allows the jury to allocate fault and assess damages based on the percentage of negligence attributable to each party involved, including the plaintiff. For example, if the jury determines that the plaintiff is 30% responsible for their injuries while the defendant is 70% responsible, the plaintiff will still be entitled to recover 70% of the damages awarded. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Bar Rule): This instruction imposes a limit on the plaintiff's ability to recover damages. If the jury finds that the plaintiff's percentage of fault is equal to or greater than 50%, the plaintiff is barred from recovering any compensation. However, if the plaintiff's percentage of fault falls below 50%, they can still seek damages, but their recovery will be reduced in proportion to their level of negligence. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 40% at fault, their damages will be reduced by 40%. Overall, the Wyoming Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense plays a vital role in ensuring a fair and just verdict in cases involving negligence. It empowers the jury to apportion fault appropriately and determine the appropriate amount of damages to be awarded to the plaintiff based on their degree of negligence.

Wyoming Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal instruction provided to the jury in Wyoming courts when considering cases involving negligence. This instruction outlines the concept of comparative negligence, which allows the jury to assign percentages of fault to each party involved in causing the plaintiff's injuries or damages. The purpose of this instruction is to guide the jury in determining the degree of negligence exhibited by both the plaintiff and the defendant and how it affects the liability and potential damages in the case. By understanding the principles of comparative negligence, the jury can make a fair and equitable decision based on the evidence presented during the trial. In Wyoming, there are two main types of comparative negligence instructions that may be provided to the jury, depending on the circumstances of the case: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: This instruction allows the jury to allocate fault and assess damages based on the percentage of negligence attributable to each party involved, including the plaintiff. For example, if the jury determines that the plaintiff is 30% responsible for their injuries while the defendant is 70% responsible, the plaintiff will still be entitled to recover 70% of the damages awarded. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Bar Rule): This instruction imposes a limit on the plaintiff's ability to recover damages. If the jury finds that the plaintiff's percentage of fault is equal to or greater than 50%, the plaintiff is barred from recovering any compensation. However, if the plaintiff's percentage of fault falls below 50%, they can still seek damages, but their recovery will be reduced in proportion to their level of negligence. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 40% at fault, their damages will be reduced by 40%. Overall, the Wyoming Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense plays a vital role in ensuring a fair and just verdict in cases involving negligence. It empowers the jury to apportion fault appropriately and determine the appropriate amount of damages to be awarded to the plaintiff based on their degree of negligence.