Wyoming Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures refers to a legal motion filed in the state of Wyoming to exclude or restrict the introduction of evidence related to actions taken by a defendant or others to prevent future harm or rectify a situation. This motion is typically used in civil litigation cases where the plaintiff seeks damages for injuries or losses suffered. One common type of Wyoming Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures is the exclusion of evidence related to safety improvements. In such cases, if a defendant has implemented safety measures after an incident occurred, the plaintiff may argue that introducing this evidence could bias the jury or judge by suggesting that the defendant was at fault before taking remedial measures. By filing this motion, the defendant aims to prevent the plaintiff from introducing evidence that could unfairly influence the perception of negligence. Another type of Wyoming Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures pertains to product liability cases. Here, if a manufacturer has made modifications or improvements to a product after an alleged defect, the defendant may seek to exclude this evidence. They argue that introducing evidence of remedial measures might prejudice the case by suggesting a prior defect or inadequacy in the product. This motion is based on the rationale that evidence of post-incident actions is irrelevant to the issue of liability. Showing that a defendant has taken steps to prevent future harm could influence the jury or judge, leading them to make decisions based on factors other than the actual liability for the original incident. The goal of the motion is to ensure a fair trial by focusing solely on the events and conditions leading to the plaintiff's injury or loss. In summary, a Wyoming Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures is a legal maneuver intended to exclude or limit the introduction of evidence pertaining to actions taken after an incident to avoid bias or prejudice. It is commonly used in cases involving safety improvements or product liability. By preventing the presentation of this evidence, the defendant aims to ensure that the jury or judge bases their decision solely on the facts and circumstances at the time of the incident.