Expand Break Charter For Free

Charter schools have unique freedom and flexibility not found in public school districts, and their freedom from the red tape of public education often allows them to dedicate increased resources and energy on supporting students in excelling academic standards.

Pros and Cons of Charter Schools ProsConsfewer students overalltransportation may be requiredsmaller class sizemore fundraising may be requiredfamily atmosphereless diverse student bodymay offer different, nontraditional ways of learningfewer sports and extracurricular activities offered5 more rows ?

Advocates of charter schools, parents particularly, see them as workable alternatives for students that aren't succeeding in traditional schools but critics portray them as elitist institutions that siphon money away. The fact that many charters are non-union is a big factor in the conflict, perhaps the dominant one.

A charter school is a public school that operates as a school of choice. Charter schools commit to obtaining specific educational objectives in return for a charter to operate a school.

Charter school critics argue that charters are fundamentally undemocratic. They do not have to operate by the same rules as district schools and in most places do not have to be as transparent about how they spend public money. They are run by private boards who do not have to be accountable to the public.

Charter school critics argue that charters are fundamentally undemocratic. They do not have to operate by the same rules as district schools and in most places do not have to be as transparent about how they spend public money. They are run by private boards who do not have to be accountable to the public.

Cons of Charter Schools Charter Schools vary by state.Charter Schools vary significantly in quality.Admissions processes can be messy.Charter schools have a higher teacher turnover rate.Charter schools sometimes expect parents to volunteer.Charter Schools may need to fundraise.Potential misuse of school funding.