This Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests is a sample of interrogatories for the Defendant in a Divorce action to ask the Plaintiff. It also includes request for production of documents. You should only use this form as a guide and delete questions not relevant to your case, as well as add questions you or your client wants to ask the Plaintiff based upon the facts of your case. It also includes the separate Notice of Filing of Discovery to be filed with the Court Clerk.
We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience, enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy. By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Read more
- US Legal Forms
- Localized Forms
- Alaska
- Anchorage
-
Alaska Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with...
Anchorage Alaska Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests
State:
Alaska
City:
Anchorage
Control #:
AK-021A-D
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Related forms
Viewed forms
How to fill out Anchorage Alaska Discovery Interrogatories From Defendant To Plaintiff With Production Requests?
If you are looking for a relevant form, it’s difficult to find a more convenient platform than the US Legal Forms site – one of the most considerable libraries on the web. Here you can get thousands of form samples for organization and personal purposes by types and states, or key phrases. Using our high-quality search option, discovering the newest Anchorage Alaska Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests is as easy as 1-2-3. Moreover, the relevance of each and every document is confirmed by a group of expert attorneys that on a regular basis check the templates on our platform and revise them based on the newest state and county laws.
If you already know about our platform and have a registered account, all you need to receive the Anchorage Alaska Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests is to log in to your profile and click the Download button.
If you make use of US Legal Forms for the first time, just follow the instructions below:
- Make sure you have chosen the form you need. Look at its information and make use of the Preview feature to explore its content. If it doesn’t meet your requirements, utilize the Search field near the top of the screen to discover the appropriate document.
- Confirm your decision. Choose the Buy now button. After that, select the preferred subscription plan and provide credentials to register an account.
- Process the purchase. Use your credit card or PayPal account to complete the registration procedure.
- Get the template. Pick the file format and download it on your device.
- Make modifications. Fill out, edit, print, and sign the acquired Anchorage Alaska Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests.
Every template you add to your profile has no expiration date and is yours permanently. You always have the ability to access them via the My Forms menu, so if you need to have an extra duplicate for editing or printing, feel free to return and save it once more at any moment.
Make use of the US Legal Forms extensive catalogue to gain access to the Anchorage Alaska Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests you were seeking and thousands of other professional and state-specific templates on one platform!
Form Rating
4.8
Satisfied(259)
Form popularity
FAQ
You can file a request online using the Alaska Department of Public Safety website or by completing the Request for Criminal Justice Information form and submitting it by mail. The processing fee for a public records request is $20 for a name search and $35 for a fingerprint search.
Requests should be submitted to the clerk of court where the case was filed. You may submit your request in person or by mail to the court. A complete list of Alaska Court System contact information is available at: .
Requests should be submitted to the clerk of court where the case was filed. You may submit your request in person or by mail to the court. A complete list of Alaska Court System contact information is available at: .
Failure to discover may result in judgement being given against the defaulting party in the main action. Documents, which may harm a litigant's case, must be ascertained as soon as possible to limit any damage that may be caused.
Courts in the State of Alaska are state agencies, and as such, court records are accessible to the general public unless the law specifies otherwise. As stipulated by the Supreme Court of Alaska, access to court records is a fundamental right of both the State's citizens and residents.
If the other person does not respond, or their response is still incomplete, you can ask the court to order them to respond. You have 45 days from the service of the most recent responses to ask the court to make an order requiring an answer. If the response was served by mail, 5 extra days are added.
A motion to compel asks the court to order either the opposing party or a third party to take some action. This sort of motion most commonly deals with discovery disputes, when a party who has propounded discovery to either the opposing party or a third party believes that the discovery responses are insufficient.
Step 1: Complete Your Written Responses. There is no Judicial Council form specifically for this procedure.Step 2: Make Copies.Step 3: Have Your Response Served.Step 4: Retain Your Response and Proof of Service.Step 5: Produce the Requested Documents and Things.
The public is allowed to look at court records for most cases. However, there are some court records the public is not allowed to see. This happens when a law or court order makes a record confidential.
Interrogatories are to be raised at a pre-trial stage and must have a close connection with the matter in question, whereas cross examinations have a wider scope of questions that can be asked.
Anchorage Alaska Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests Related Searches
-
alaska civil rule 82
-
alaska civil rule 77
-
alaska civil rules of procedure
-
alaska civil rule 26
-
alaska court forms
-
alaska appellate rules
-
alaska rules of professional conduct
-
alaska rules of evidence
-
anchorage alaska
Interesting Questions
My full legal name is [Plaintiff's Full Name].
My address is [Plaintiff's Address].
Yes, I am the same person mentioned as the plaintiff in the lawsuit.
Yes, I suffered injuries and damages as a result of the incident mentioned in the lawsuit.
On [date], while [briefly explain circumstances], I encountered an incident that resulted in my injuries and damages.
No, I have not previously filed any claims or lawsuits related to similar incidents or injuries.
More info
Published in a periodical of the Alaska Bar Association. Download Fillable Form Tf-255 In Pdf - The Latest Version Applicable For 2022.2 E. U.S. Response to Defendant's First Request for Production: Ashland Ethanol. Penny is injured in a motor vehicle collision with Dirk. Interrogatory No. 20. 4 Interrogatory No. 20 asks: "If your response to any of Defendants'. Interrogatories are one form of discovery in a lawsuit. Of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production. The Parties in a Lawsuit. "Plaintiff" is the person who starts a lawsuit.
Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies
Anchorage Alaska Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests
Change state
To change the state, select it from the list below and press Change state.
Changing the state redirects you to another page.
Alaska
Change state
-
No results found.
-
Alaska
-
Alabama
-
Arizona
-
Arkansas
-
California
-
Colorado
-
Connecticut
-
Delaware
-
District of Columbia
-
Florida
-
Georgia
-
Hawaii
-
Idaho
-
Illinois
-
Indiana
-
Iowa
-
Kentucky
-
Louisiana
-
Maine
-
Maryland
-
Massachusetts
-
Michigan
-
Minnesota
-
Mississippi
-
Missouri
-
Montana
-
Nebraska
-
Nevada
-
New Mexico
-
New York
-
North Carolina
-
North Dakota
-
Ohio
-
Oklahoma
-
Oregon
-
Pennsylvania
-
Rhode Island
-
South Dakota
-
Tennessee
-
Texas
-
Utah
-
Vermont
-
Washington
-
West Virginia
-
Wisconsin
-
Wyoming
Law summary
Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests
Note: This summary is not intended to be
an all-inclusive summary of discovery law in Alaska, but does include basic
and other information.
Definitions
Discovery: A procedure designed to allow disclosure of information between plaintiffs and Defendants. Written questions, oral questioning, document production and admissions requests are generally allowed. Discovery was designed to to prevent trial by ambush.
Interrogatories: Written questions from Plaintiff to Defendant, or from Defendant to Plaintiff. The questions are mailed to the Plaintiff, Defendant or the attorney for response in writing. The answers or responses are usually due between 20-30 days.
Deposition: A procedure where verbal questions are asked a Plaintiff or Defendant for immediate response. Depositions are usually recorded by a court reporter, who swears the person to tell the truth before questioning begins.
Production of Documents: The method of obtaining documents from the other party relevant to the case such as all documents a party intends to introduce at trial.
Requests for Admissions: Written questions where you request the other party to admit or deny some relevant fact.
Objections: Objections may be made to all discovery questions if the questions are not relevant, or likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.
Civil Procedure Rules: Virtually all states have adopted a version of civil procedure rules which include rules dealing with discovery.
Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure: Alaska has adopted the Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure which contain rules governing discovery.
General Discussion of Discovery
Alaska requires a pre-discovery disclosure without the other party having to request the information through formal discovery methods.
The disclosure rule provides:
Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure.
(a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter. Disclosure under subparagraphs (a)(1), (2), and (3) of this rule is required in all civil actions, except those categories of cases exempted from the requirement of scheduling conferences and scheduling orders under Civil Rule 16(g), adoption proceedings, and prisoner litigation against the state under AS 09.19.
(1) Initial Disclosures. Except to the extent otherwise directed by order or rule, a party shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to other parties:
(A) the factual basis of each of its claims or defenses;
(B) the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have discoverable information relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings,identifying the subjects of the information and whether the attorney-client privilege applies;
(C) the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual who has made a written or recorded statement and, unless the statement is privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure, either a copy of the statement or the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of the custodian;
(D) subject to the provisions of Civil Rule 26(b)(3), a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents, data compilations, and tangible things that are relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings;
(E) subject to the provisions of Civil Rule 26(b)(3), all photographs, diagrams, and videotapes of persons, objects, scenes and occurrences that are relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings;
(F) each insurance agreement under which any person carrying on an insurance business may be liable to satisfy part or all of a judgment which may be entered in the action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment; and
(G) all categories of damages claimed by the disclosing party, and a computation of each category of special damages, making available for inspection and copying as under Rule 34 the documents or other evidentiary material, not privileged or protected from disclosure, on which such claims are based, including materials bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered.
Unless otherwise directed by the court, these disclosures shall be made at or within 10 days after the meeting of the parties under paragraph (f). A party shall make its initial disclosures based on the information then reasonably available to it and is not excused from making its disclosures because it has not fully completed its investigation of the case or because it challenges the sufficiency of another party's disclosures or because another party has not made its disclosures.
Discovery Methods: Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: (1) depositions upon oral examination or written questions; (2) written interrogatories; (3) production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property, for inspection and other purposes; and (4) requests for admission.
Scope: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. The information sought need not be admissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
Limitations. The court may alter the limits in these rules on the number of depositions and interrogatories, the length of depositions under Rule 30, and the number of requests under Rule 36. The frequency or extent of use of the discovery methods otherwise permitted under these rules shall be limited by the court if it determines that: (i) the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or is obtainable from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; (ii) the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain the information sought; or (iii) the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, taking into account the needs of the case, the amount in controversy, the parties' resources, the importance of the issues at stake in the litigation, and the importance of the proposed discovery in resolving the issues.
Experts: A party may depose any person who has been identified as an expert whose opinions may be presented at trial. If a report from the expert is required under section (a)(2)(B), the deposition shall not be conducted until after the report is provided.
Under the mandatory disclosure of Rule 26, a written report prepared and signed by the expert witness shall be provided as to all experts to be used at trial. The report shall contain a complete statement of all opinions to be expressed and the basis and reasons therefor; the data or other information considered by the witness in forming the opinions; any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for the opinions; the qualifications of the witness, including a list of all publications authored by the witness within the preceding ten years; the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony; and a listing of any other cases in which the witness has testified as an expert at trial or by deposition within the preceding four years.
Timing of Discovery Non-Exempted Actions.
In an action in which disclosure is required under Rule 26(a), a party may serve up to ten of the thirty interrogatories allowed under Rule 33(a) at the times allowed by section (d)(2)(C) of this rule. Otherwise, except by order of the court or agreement of the parties, a party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have met and conferred as required by paragraph (f).
Timing of Discovery Exempt Actions:
In actions exempted from disclosure under Rule 26(a), discovery may take place as follows:
(A) For depositions upon oral examination under Civil Rule 30, a defendant may take depositions at any time after commencement of the action. The plaintiff must obtain leave of court if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition prior to the expiration of 30 days after service of the summons and complaint upon any defendant or service by publication if authorized, except that leave is not required (i) if a defendant has served a notice of taking deposition or otherwise sought discovery, or (ii) the plaintiff seeks to take the deposition under Civil Rule 30(a)(2)(C).
(B) For depositions upon written questions under Civil Rule 31, a party may serve questions at any time after commencement of the action.
(C) For interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission under Civil Rules 33, 34, and 36,discovery requests may be served upon the plaintiff at any time after the commencement of the action, and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party.
(3) Sequence of Discovery. Unless the court upon motion, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice, orders otherwise, methods of discovery may be used in any sequence, and the fact that a party is conducting discovery, whether by deposition or otherwise, shall not operate to delay any other party's discovery.
Supplementation of Responses: A party who has made a disclosure under paragraph (a) or Civil Rule 26.1(b) or responded to a request for discovery with a disclosure or response is under a duty to supplement or correct the disclosure or response to include information thereafter acquired if ordered by the court or in the following circumstances:
(1) A party is under a duty to supplement at appropriate intervals its disclosures under paragraph (a) if the party learns that in some material respect the information disclosed is incomplete or incorrect and if the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made known to the other parties during the discovery process or in writing. With respect to testimony of an expert from whom a report is required under subdivision (a)(2)(B) the duty extends both to information contained in the report and to information provided through a deposition of the expert.
(2) A party is under a duty seasonably to amend a prior response to an interrogatory, request for production, or request for admission if the party learns that the response is in some material respect incomplete or incorrect and if the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made known to the other parties during the discovery process or in writing. Rule 26(e)
Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken: Within the State. Within the state, depositions shall be taken before an officer authorized by the laws of this state to administer oaths, or before a person appointed by the court in which the action is pending. A person appointed has power to administer oaths and take testimony.
Without the State but Within the United States. Without the state but within the United States, or within a territory or insular possession subject to the dominion of the United States, depositions shall be taken before an officer authorized to administer oaths by the laws of the United States or of the place where the examination is held.
Stipulations: Unless otherwise directed by the court, the parties may by written stipulation (1) provide that depositions may be taken before any person, at any time or place, upon any notice, and in any manner and that when so taken may be used like other depositions, and (2) modify other procedures governing or limitations placed upon discovery, except that stipulations extending the time provided in Rules 33, 34, and 36 for responses to discovery may, if they would interfere with any time set for filing of motions, for hearing of a motion, or for trial, be made only with the approval of the court.
Rule 30 Depositions:
(a) When Depositions May Be Taken; When Leave is Required:
(1) A party may take the testimony of any person, including a party,by deposition upon oral examination without leave of court except as provided in paragraph (2). The attendance of witnesses may be compelled by subpoena as provided in Rule 45.
(2) A party must obtain leave of court, which shall be granted to the extent consistent with the principles stated in Rule 26(b)(2), if the person to be examined is confined in prison or if, without the written stipulation of the parties,
(A) a proposed deposition would result in more than three depositions being taken under this rule or Rule 31 by the plaintiffs, or by the defendants, or by third-party defendants, of witnesses other than:
(i) parties, which means any individual identified as a party in the pleadings and any individual whom a party claims in its disclosure statements is covered by the attorney- client privilege;
(ii) independent expert witnesses expected to be called at trial;
(iii) treating physicians; and
(iv) document custodians whose depositions are necessary to secure the production of documents or to establish an evidentiary foundation for the admissibility of documents;
(B) the person to be examined already has been deposed in the case; or
(C) a party seeks to take a deposition before the time specified in Rule 26(d) unless the notice contains a certification,with supporting facts, that the person to be examined is expected to leave Alaska and be unavailable for examination in this state unless deposed before that time.
(b) Notice of Examination: General Requirements; Method of Recording; Production of Documents and Things; Deposition of Organization; Deposition by Telephone.
(1) A party desiring to take the deposition of any person upon oral examination shall give reasonable notice in writing to every other party to the action. The notice shall state the time and place for taking the deposition and the name and address of each person to be examined, if known, and, if the name is not known, a general description sufficient to identify the person or the particular class or group to which the person belongs. If a subpoena duces tecum is to be served on the person to be examined, the designation of the materials to be produced as set forth in the subpoena shall be attached to, or included in, the notice.
(2) Reserved.
(3) Reserved.
(4) Reserved.
(5) The notice to a party deponent may be accompanied by a request made in compliance with Rule 34 for the production of documents and tangible things at the taking of the deposition. The procedure of Rule 34 shall apply to the quest.
(6) A party may in the party's notice and in a subpoena name as the deponent a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency and describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested. In that event, the organization so named shall designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents,or other persons who consent to testify on its behalf,and may set forth, for each person designated, the matters on which the person will testify. A subpoena shall advise a nonparty organization of its duty to make such a designation. The persons so designated shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the organization.
Rule 30.1. Audio and Audio-Visual Depositions.
(a) Authorization of Audio-Visual Depositions.
(1) Any deposition upon oral examination may be recorded by audio or audio-visual means without a stenographic record. Any party may make at the party's own expense a simultaneous stenographic or audio record of the deposition. Upon request and at the expense of the requesting party, any party is entitled to an audio or audio-visual copy of the audio-visual recording.
(2) The audio or audio-visual recording is an official record of the deposition. A transcript prepared in accordance with Rule 30(c) is also an official record of the deposition.
(3) On motion for good cause the court may order the party taking, or who took, a deposition by audio or audio-visual recording to furnish at that party's expense a transcript of the deposition.
(b) Use. An audio or audio-visual deposition may be used for any purpose and under any circumstances in which a stenographic deposition may be used.
(c) Notice. The notice for taking an audio or audio-visual deposition and the subpoena for attendance at that deposition must state that the deposition will be recorded by audio or audio-visual means. If a court reporter will not be used to record the deposition, the notice must also state this fact.
(d) Procedure. The following procedure must be observed in recording an audio or audio-visual deposition:
(1) The deposition must begin with an oral statement which includes:
(A) the operator's name and business address;
(B) the name and business address of the operator's employer;
(C) the date, time, and place of the deposition;
(D) the caption of the case;
(E) the name of the witness;
(F) the party on whose behalf the deposition is being taken; and
(G) any stipulations by the parties.
(2) Counsel shall identify themselves on the recording.
(3) The oath must be administered to a witness on the recording.
(4) The videotaped deposition shall depict the witness in a waist-up shot, seated at a table. The camera and lens shall not be varied except as may be necessary to follow natural body movements of the witness or to present exhibits or describe evidence that is being used during the deposition.
(5) If the length of the deposition requires the use of more than one recording unit, the end of each unit and the beginning of each succeeding unit must be announced on the recording.
(6) At the conclusion of the deposition, a statement must be made on the recording that the deposition is concluded. A statement may be made on the recording setting forth any stipulations made by counsel concerning the custody of the recording and exhibits or other pertinent matters.
(7) Audio depositions must be indexed by a brief written log notation of the recorder counter number at the beginning of each examination whether direct, cross, redirect, etc. The log must be attached to the tape.
(8) Audio-visual depositions may be indexed by a time generator or similar method.
(9) An objection must be made as in the case of stenographic depositions.
(10) Unless otherwise stipulated by the parties, the original audio or audio-visual recording of a deposition shall be held by the party noticing the deposition.
(11) If the court issues an editing order, the original audio or audio-visual recording must not be altered.
(e) Costs. The reasonable expense of recording, editing, and using an audio or audio-visual deposition may be taxed as costs.
(f) Standards. The Administrative Director may establish standards for audio or audio-visual equipment and guidelines for taking and using audio or audio-visual depositions. Incompatible audio or audio-visual recordings must be conformed to the standards at the expense of the proponent. Conformed recordings may be used as originals.
Note to Civil Rule 30.1(f): The Administrative Director has not established standards for audio or audio-visual equipment or guidelines for taking and using audio or audio-visual depositions.
Rule 33 Interrogatories
a) Availability: Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, or governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is available to the party. Without leave of court or written stipulation, a party may serve only thirty interrogatories upon another party, including all discrete subparts. This limit includes interrogatories served under Rule 26(d)(1). Leave to serve additional interrogatories shall be granted to the extent consistent with the principles of Rule 26(b)(2). Without leave of court or written stipulation, interrogatories may not be served before the time specified in Rule 26(d). There shall be sufficient space provided so that answers to the interrogatories propounded may be inserted thereon.
(b) Answers and Objections:
(1) Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the objecting party shall state the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent the interrogatory is not objectionable.
(2) The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making them.
(3) The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the answers, and objections if any, within 30 days after the service of the interrogatories. A shorter or longer time may be directed by the court or, in the absence of such an order, agreed to in writing by the parties subject to Rule 29.
(4) All grounds for an objection to an interrogatory shall be stated with specificity. Any ground not stated in a timely objection is waived unless the party's failure to object is excused by the court for good cause shown.
(5) The party submitting the interrogatories may move for an order under Rule 37(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to answer an interrogatory.
(c) Scope; Use at Trial. Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired into under Rule 26(b)(1), and the answers may be used to the extent permitted by the rules of evidence.
An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable merely because an answer to the interrogatory involves an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, but the court may order that such an interrogatory need not be answered until after designated discovery has been completed or until a pretrial conference or other later time.
(d) Option to Produce Business Records. Where the answer to an interrogatory may be derived or ascertained from the business records of the party upon whom the interrogatory has been served or from an examination, audit or inspection of such business records, or from a compilation, abstract or summary based thereon, and the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer is substantially the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party served, it is a sufficient answer to such interrogatory to specify the records from which the answer may be derived or ascertained and to afford to the party serving the interrogatory reasonable opportunity to examine, audit or inspect such records and to make copies, compilations, abstracts or summaries.
Rule 34 Production
Any party may serve on any other party a request (1) to produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on his behalf, to inspect and copy, any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent through detection devices into reasonably useable form), or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things which constitute or contain matters within the allowed discovery scope and which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or (2) to permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the allowed discovery scope.
The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party. The request shall set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts.
The party upon whom the request is served shall serve a written response within thirty days after the service of the request, except that a defendant may serve a response within forty-five days after service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. The court may allow a shorter or longer time.
The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the part shall be specified.
When producing documents, the producing party shall produce them as they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize and label them to correspond with the categories in the request that call for their production.
Rule 36 Requests for Admissions
(a) Request for Admissions: A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. Without leave of court or written stipulation, requests for admission may not be served before the time specified in Rule 26(d).
Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless, within 30 days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow or as the parties may agree to in writing, subject to Rule 29, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party or by the party's attorney.
If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, the party shall specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless the party states that the party has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by the party is insufficient to enable the party to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; the party may, subject to the provisions of Rule 37(c), deny the matter or set forth reasons why the party cannot admit or deny it.
The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of this rule, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request be made at a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior to trial.
(b) Effect of Admission: Any matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission. Subject to the provisions of Rule 16 governing amendment of a pretrial order, the court may permit withdrawal or amendment when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the party who obtained the admission fails to satisfy the court that withdrawal or amendment will prejudice the party in maintaining the action or defense on the merits. Any admission made by a party under this rule is for the purpose of the pending action only and is not an admission for any other purpose nor may it be used against the party in any other proceeding.
Rule 37 Compel Discovery
A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling discovery.
If you require extra time to respond to discovery, you should ask the other side for an extension in writing. It may also be necessary to enter an order granting the extension to protect your rights.
Discovery questions are limited in number so select the most important questions to ask the other side. Don't waste your requests writing questions that you already know the answer to.
Legal definition
Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests
Note: This summary is not intended to be
an all-inclusive summary of discovery law in Alaska, but does include basic
and other information.
Definitions
Discovery: A procedure designed to allow disclosure of information between plaintiffs and Defendants. Written questions, oral questioning, document production and admissions requests are generally allowed. Discovery was designed to to prevent trial by ambush.
Interrogatories: Written questions from Plaintiff to Defendant, or from Defendant to Plaintiff. The questions are mailed to the Plaintiff, Defendant or the attorney for response in writing. The answers or responses are usually due between 20-30 days.
Deposition: A procedure where verbal questions are asked a Plaintiff or Defendant for immediate response. Depositions are usually recorded by a court reporter, who swears the person to tell the truth before questioning begins.
Production of Documents: The method of obtaining documents from the other party relevant to the case such as all documents a party intends to introduce at trial.
Requests for Admissions: Written questions where you request the other party to admit or deny some relevant fact.
Objections: Objections may be made to all discovery questions if the questions are not relevant, or likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.
Civil Procedure Rules: Virtually all states have adopted a version of civil procedure rules which include rules dealing with discovery.
Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure: Alaska has adopted the Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure which contain rules governing discovery.
General Discussion of Discovery
Alaska requires a pre-discovery disclosure without the other party having to request the information through formal discovery methods.
The disclosure rule provides:
Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure.
(a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter. Disclosure under subparagraphs (a)(1), (2), and (3) of this rule is required in all civil actions, except those categories of cases exempted from the requirement of scheduling conferences and scheduling orders under Civil Rule 16(g), adoption proceedings, and prisoner litigation against the state under AS 09.19.
(1) Initial Disclosures. Except to the extent otherwise directed by order or rule, a party shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to other parties:
(A) the factual basis of each of its claims or defenses;
(B) the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have discoverable information relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings,identifying the subjects of the information and whether the attorney-client privilege applies;
(C) the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual who has made a written or recorded statement and, unless the statement is privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure, either a copy of the statement or the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of the custodian;
(D) subject to the provisions of Civil Rule 26(b)(3), a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents, data compilations, and tangible things that are relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings;
(E) subject to the provisions of Civil Rule 26(b)(3), all photographs, diagrams, and videotapes of persons, objects, scenes and occurrences that are relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings;
(F) each insurance agreement under which any person carrying on an insurance business may be liable to satisfy part or all of a judgment which may be entered in the action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment; and
(G) all categories of damages claimed by the disclosing party, and a computation of each category of special damages, making available for inspection and copying as under Rule 34 the documents or other evidentiary material, not privileged or protected from disclosure, on which such claims are based, including materials bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered.
Unless otherwise directed by the court, these disclosures shall be made at or within 10 days after the meeting of the parties under paragraph (f). A party shall make its initial disclosures based on the information then reasonably available to it and is not excused from making its disclosures because it has not fully completed its investigation of the case or because it challenges the sufficiency of another party's disclosures or because another party has not made its disclosures.
Discovery Methods: Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: (1) depositions upon oral examination or written questions; (2) written interrogatories; (3) production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property, for inspection and other purposes; and (4) requests for admission.
Scope: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. The information sought need not be admissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
Limitations. The court may alter the limits in these rules on the number of depositions and interrogatories, the length of depositions under Rule 30, and the number of requests under Rule 36. The frequency or extent of use of the discovery methods otherwise permitted under these rules shall be limited by the court if it determines that: (i) the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or is obtainable from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; (ii) the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain the information sought; or (iii) the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, taking into account the needs of the case, the amount in controversy, the parties' resources, the importance of the issues at stake in the litigation, and the importance of the proposed discovery in resolving the issues.
Experts: A party may depose any person who has been identified as an expert whose opinions may be presented at trial. If a report from the expert is required under section (a)(2)(B), the deposition shall not be conducted until after the report is provided.
Under the mandatory disclosure of Rule 26, a written report prepared and signed by the expert witness shall be provided as to all experts to be used at trial. The report shall contain a complete statement of all opinions to be expressed and the basis and reasons therefor; the data or other information considered by the witness in forming the opinions; any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for the opinions; the qualifications of the witness, including a list of all publications authored by the witness within the preceding ten years; the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony; and a listing of any other cases in which the witness has testified as an expert at trial or by deposition within the preceding four years.
Timing of Discovery Non-Exempted Actions.
In an action in which disclosure is required under Rule 26(a), a party may serve up to ten of the thirty interrogatories allowed under Rule 33(a) at the times allowed by section (d)(2)(C) of this rule. Otherwise, except by order of the court or agreement of the parties, a party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have met and conferred as required by paragraph (f).
Timing of Discovery Exempt Actions:
In actions exempted from disclosure under Rule 26(a), discovery may take place as follows:
(A) For depositions upon oral examination under Civil Rule 30, a defendant may take depositions at any time after commencement of the action. The plaintiff must obtain leave of court if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition prior to the expiration of 30 days after service of the summons and complaint upon any defendant or service by publication if authorized, except that leave is not required (i) if a defendant has served a notice of taking deposition or otherwise sought discovery, or (ii) the plaintiff seeks to take the deposition under Civil Rule 30(a)(2)(C).
(B) For depositions upon written questions under Civil Rule 31, a party may serve questions at any time after commencement of the action.
(C) For interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission under Civil Rules 33, 34, and 36,discovery requests may be served upon the plaintiff at any time after the commencement of the action, and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party.
(3) Sequence of Discovery. Unless the court upon motion, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice, orders otherwise, methods of discovery may be used in any sequence, and the fact that a party is conducting discovery, whether by deposition or otherwise, shall not operate to delay any other party's discovery.
Supplementation of Responses: A party who has made a disclosure under paragraph (a) or Civil Rule 26.1(b) or responded to a request for discovery with a disclosure or response is under a duty to supplement or correct the disclosure or response to include information thereafter acquired if ordered by the court or in the following circumstances:
(1) A party is under a duty to supplement at appropriate intervals its disclosures under paragraph (a) if the party learns that in some material respect the information disclosed is incomplete or incorrect and if the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made known to the other parties during the discovery process or in writing. With respect to testimony of an expert from whom a report is required under subdivision (a)(2)(B) the duty extends both to information contained in the report and to information provided through a deposition of the expert.
(2) A party is under a duty seasonably to amend a prior response to an interrogatory, request for production, or request for admission if the party learns that the response is in some material respect incomplete or incorrect and if the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made known to the other parties during the discovery process or in writing. Rule 26(e)
Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken: Within the State. Within the state, depositions shall be taken before an officer authorized by the laws of this state to administer oaths, or before a person appointed by the court in which the action is pending. A person appointed has power to administer oaths and take testimony.
Without the State but Within the United States. Without the state but within the United States, or within a territory or insular possession subject to the dominion of the United States, depositions shall be taken before an officer authorized to administer oaths by the laws of the United States or of the place where the examination is held.
Stipulations: Unless otherwise directed by the court, the parties may by written stipulation (1) provide that depositions may be taken before any person, at any time or place, upon any notice, and in any manner and that when so taken may be used like other depositions, and (2) modify other procedures governing or limitations placed upon discovery, except that stipulations extending the time provided in Rules 33, 34, and 36 for responses to discovery may, if they would interfere with any time set for filing of motions, for hearing of a motion, or for trial, be made only with the approval of the court.
Rule 30 Depositions:
(a) When Depositions May Be Taken; When Leave is Required:
(1) A party may take the testimony of any person, including a party,by deposition upon oral examination without leave of court except as provided in paragraph (2). The attendance of witnesses may be compelled by subpoena as provided in Rule 45.
(2) A party must obtain leave of court, which shall be granted to the extent consistent with the principles stated in Rule 26(b)(2), if the person to be examined is confined in prison or if, without the written stipulation of the parties,
(A) a proposed deposition would result in more than three depositions being taken under this rule or Rule 31 by the plaintiffs, or by the defendants, or by third-party defendants, of witnesses other than:
(i) parties, which means any individual identified as a party in the pleadings and any individual whom a party claims in its disclosure statements is covered by the attorney- client privilege;
(ii) independent expert witnesses expected to be called at trial;
(iii) treating physicians; and
(iv) document custodians whose depositions are necessary to secure the production of documents or to establish an evidentiary foundation for the admissibility of documents;
(B) the person to be examined already has been deposed in the case; or
(C) a party seeks to take a deposition before the time specified in Rule 26(d) unless the notice contains a certification,with supporting facts, that the person to be examined is expected to leave Alaska and be unavailable for examination in this state unless deposed before that time.
(b) Notice of Examination: General Requirements; Method of Recording; Production of Documents and Things; Deposition of Organization; Deposition by Telephone.
(1) A party desiring to take the deposition of any person upon oral examination shall give reasonable notice in writing to every other party to the action. The notice shall state the time and place for taking the deposition and the name and address of each person to be examined, if known, and, if the name is not known, a general description sufficient to identify the person or the particular class or group to which the person belongs. If a subpoena duces tecum is to be served on the person to be examined, the designation of the materials to be produced as set forth in the subpoena shall be attached to, or included in, the notice.
(2) Reserved.
(3) Reserved.
(4) Reserved.
(5) The notice to a party deponent may be accompanied by a request made in compliance with Rule 34 for the production of documents and tangible things at the taking of the deposition. The procedure of Rule 34 shall apply to the quest.
(6) A party may in the party's notice and in a subpoena name as the deponent a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency and describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested. In that event, the organization so named shall designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents,or other persons who consent to testify on its behalf,and may set forth, for each person designated, the matters on which the person will testify. A subpoena shall advise a nonparty organization of its duty to make such a designation. The persons so designated shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the organization.
Rule 30.1. Audio and Audio-Visual Depositions.
(a) Authorization of Audio-Visual Depositions.
(1) Any deposition upon oral examination may be recorded by audio or audio-visual means without a stenographic record. Any party may make at the party's own expense a simultaneous stenographic or audio record of the deposition. Upon request and at the expense of the requesting party, any party is entitled to an audio or audio-visual copy of the audio-visual recording.
(2) The audio or audio-visual recording is an official record of the deposition. A transcript prepared in accordance with Rule 30(c) is also an official record of the deposition.
(3) On motion for good cause the court may order the party taking, or who took, a deposition by audio or audio-visual recording to furnish at that party's expense a transcript of the deposition.
(b) Use. An audio or audio-visual deposition may be used for any purpose and under any circumstances in which a stenographic deposition may be used.
(c) Notice. The notice for taking an audio or audio-visual deposition and the subpoena for attendance at that deposition must state that the deposition will be recorded by audio or audio-visual means. If a court reporter will not be used to record the deposition, the notice must also state this fact.
(d) Procedure. The following procedure must be observed in recording an audio or audio-visual deposition:
(1) The deposition must begin with an oral statement which includes:
(A) the operator's name and business address;
(B) the name and business address of the operator's employer;
(C) the date, time, and place of the deposition;
(D) the caption of the case;
(E) the name of the witness;
(F) the party on whose behalf the deposition is being taken; and
(G) any stipulations by the parties.
(2) Counsel shall identify themselves on the recording.
(3) The oath must be administered to a witness on the recording.
(4) The videotaped deposition shall depict the witness in a waist-up shot, seated at a table. The camera and lens shall not be varied except as may be necessary to follow natural body movements of the witness or to present exhibits or describe evidence that is being used during the deposition.
(5) If the length of the deposition requires the use of more than one recording unit, the end of each unit and the beginning of each succeeding unit must be announced on the recording.
(6) At the conclusion of the deposition, a statement must be made on the recording that the deposition is concluded. A statement may be made on the recording setting forth any stipulations made by counsel concerning the custody of the recording and exhibits or other pertinent matters.
(7) Audio depositions must be indexed by a brief written log notation of the recorder counter number at the beginning of each examination whether direct, cross, redirect, etc. The log must be attached to the tape.
(8) Audio-visual depositions may be indexed by a time generator or similar method.
(9) An objection must be made as in the case of stenographic depositions.
(10) Unless otherwise stipulated by the parties, the original audio or audio-visual recording of a deposition shall be held by the party noticing the deposition.
(11) If the court issues an editing order, the original audio or audio-visual recording must not be altered.
(e) Costs. The reasonable expense of recording, editing, and using an audio or audio-visual deposition may be taxed as costs.
(f) Standards. The Administrative Director may establish standards for audio or audio-visual equipment and guidelines for taking and using audio or audio-visual depositions. Incompatible audio or audio-visual recordings must be conformed to the standards at the expense of the proponent. Conformed recordings may be used as originals.
Note to Civil Rule 30.1(f): The Administrative Director has not established standards for audio or audio-visual equipment or guidelines for taking and using audio or audio-visual depositions.
Rule 33 Interrogatories
a) Availability: Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, or governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is available to the party. Without leave of court or written stipulation, a party may serve only thirty interrogatories upon another party, including all discrete subparts. This limit includes interrogatories served under Rule 26(d)(1). Leave to serve additional interrogatories shall be granted to the extent consistent with the principles of Rule 26(b)(2). Without leave of court or written stipulation, interrogatories may not be served before the time specified in Rule 26(d). There shall be sufficient space provided so that answers to the interrogatories propounded may be inserted thereon.
(b) Answers and Objections:
(1) Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the objecting party shall state the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent the interrogatory is not objectionable.
(2) The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making them.
(3) The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the answers, and objections if any, within 30 days after the service of the interrogatories. A shorter or longer time may be directed by the court or, in the absence of such an order, agreed to in writing by the parties subject to Rule 29.
(4) All grounds for an objection to an interrogatory shall be stated with specificity. Any ground not stated in a timely objection is waived unless the party's failure to object is excused by the court for good cause shown.
(5) The party submitting the interrogatories may move for an order under Rule 37(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to answer an interrogatory.
(c) Scope; Use at Trial. Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired into under Rule 26(b)(1), and the answers may be used to the extent permitted by the rules of evidence.
An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable merely because an answer to the interrogatory involves an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, but the court may order that such an interrogatory need not be answered until after designated discovery has been completed or until a pretrial conference or other later time.
(d) Option to Produce Business Records. Where the answer to an interrogatory may be derived or ascertained from the business records of the party upon whom the interrogatory has been served or from an examination, audit or inspection of such business records, or from a compilation, abstract or summary based thereon, and the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer is substantially the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party served, it is a sufficient answer to such interrogatory to specify the records from which the answer may be derived or ascertained and to afford to the party serving the interrogatory reasonable opportunity to examine, audit or inspect such records and to make copies, compilations, abstracts or summaries.
Rule 34 Production
Any party may serve on any other party a request (1) to produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on his behalf, to inspect and copy, any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent through detection devices into reasonably useable form), or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things which constitute or contain matters within the allowed discovery scope and which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or (2) to permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the allowed discovery scope.
The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party. The request shall set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts.
The party upon whom the request is served shall serve a written response within thirty days after the service of the request, except that a defendant may serve a response within forty-five days after service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. The court may allow a shorter or longer time.
The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the part shall be specified.
When producing documents, the producing party shall produce them as they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize and label them to correspond with the categories in the request that call for their production.
Rule 36 Requests for Admissions
(a) Request for Admissions: A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. Without leave of court or written stipulation, requests for admission may not be served before the time specified in Rule 26(d).
Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless, within 30 days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow or as the parties may agree to in writing, subject to Rule 29, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party or by the party's attorney.
If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, the party shall specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless the party states that the party has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by the party is insufficient to enable the party to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; the party may, subject to the provisions of Rule 37(c), deny the matter or set forth reasons why the party cannot admit or deny it.
The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of this rule, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request be made at a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior to trial.
(b) Effect of Admission: Any matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission. Subject to the provisions of Rule 16 governing amendment of a pretrial order, the court may permit withdrawal or amendment when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the party who obtained the admission fails to satisfy the court that withdrawal or amendment will prejudice the party in maintaining the action or defense on the merits. Any admission made by a party under this rule is for the purpose of the pending action only and is not an admission for any other purpose nor may it be used against the party in any other proceeding.
Rule 37 Compel Discovery
A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling discovery.
If you require extra time to respond to discovery, you should ask the other side for an extension in writing. It may also be necessary to enter an order granting the extension to protect your rights.
Discovery questions are limited in number so select the most important questions to ask the other side. Don't waste your requests writing questions that you already know the answer to.
Sorry, this device is not supported
Please open this page on your desktop computer.