This Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests is a sample of interrogatories for the Defendant in a Divorce action to ask the Plaintiff. It also includes request for production of documents. You should only use this form as a guide and delete questions not relevant to your case, as well as add questions you or your client wants to ask the Plaintiff based upon the facts of your case. It also includes the separate Notice of Filing of Discovery to be filed with the Court Clerk.
We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience, enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy. By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Read more
- US Legal Forms
- Localized Forms
- Colorado
- Aurora
-
Colorado Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with...
Aurora Colorado Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests
State:
Colorado
City:
Aurora
Control #:
CO-021A-D
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Related forms
Viewed forms
How to fill out Aurora Colorado Discovery Interrogatories From Defendant To Plaintiff With Production Requests?
Benefit from the US Legal Forms and obtain instant access to any form you need. Our beneficial website with thousands of documents allows you to find and get almost any document sample you will need. It is possible to export, complete, and certify the Aurora Colorado Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests in a couple of minutes instead of browsing the web for many hours trying to find the right template.
Using our collection is a wonderful way to increase the safety of your form submissions. Our professional legal professionals regularly check all the records to make certain that the forms are relevant for a particular region and compliant with new laws and polices.
How can you obtain the Aurora Colorado Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests? If you have a subscription, just log in to the account. The Download button will appear on all the documents you view. Moreover, you can get all the earlier saved documents in the My Forms menu.
If you don’t have a profile yet, stick to the tips listed below:
- Open the page with the form you require. Make sure that it is the template you were looking for: verify its name and description, and take take advantage of the Preview function if it is available. Otherwise, use the Search field to find the appropriate one.
- Start the downloading process. Click Buy Now and select the pricing plan you like. Then, sign up for an account and process your order with a credit card or PayPal.
- Export the document. Pick the format to obtain the Aurora Colorado Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests and revise and complete, or sign it according to your requirements.
US Legal Forms is among the most significant and trustworthy form libraries on the internet. We are always happy to assist you in any legal process, even if it is just downloading the Aurora Colorado Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests.
Feel free to make the most of our form catalog and make your document experience as efficient as possible!
Form Rating
4.85
Satisfied(315)
Form popularity
FAQ
Interrogatories, which are written questions about things that are relevant or important to the case. (NRCP 33; JCRCP 33) Requests for production of documents or things, which are written requests that demand the other side provide particular documents or items.
Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for discovery and inspection of documents and things in the course of developing a case for trial. Subsection (b)(1)(A) states that the request must ?describe with reasonable particularity each item or category of items to be inspected.? See Fed. R. Civ.
Answers to interrogatories can be much more complete than answers to deposition questions. Interrogatories are generally less expensive than depositions because they don't require court reporter fees, transcript costs, or attorney time in traveling to and from the deposition.
Parties may object to these pattern interrogatories on grounds including, but not limited to, that the interrogatories exceed the scope of permissible discovery as defined in C.R.C.P. 26(b)(1) because the inquiry is not relevant to the claims and defenses of any party or is not proportional to the needs of the case.
Whereas depositions are useful for obtaining candid responses from a party and answers not prepared in advance, interrogatories are designed to obtain accurate information about specific topics. Interrogatories can be quicker, less costly, and less complicated than depositions, but there are downsides.
At any time in its discretion and upon such terms as it deems just, the court may allow any process or proof of service thereof to be amended, unless it clearly appears that material prejudice would result to the substantial rights of the party against whom the process is issued.
Interrogatories are to be raised at a pre-trial stage and must have a close connection with the matter in question, whereas cross examinations have a wider scope of questions that can be asked.
Objections to the competency of a witness or to the competency, relevancy, or materiality of testimony are not waived by failure to make them before or during the taking of the deposition, unless the ground of the objection is one which might have been obviated or removed if presented at that time.
Interrogatories are a discovery tool that the parties can use to have specific questions about a case answered before trial. Interrogatories are lists of questions sent to the other party that s/he must respond to in writing.
Aurora Colorado Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests Related Searches
-
premises liability interrogatories to defendant
-
colorado rules of civil procedure 2021 pdf
-
colorado rules of civil procedure 2020 pdf
-
c.r.c.p. 26
-
slip and fall interrogatories to defendant
-
colorado rules of civil procedure 121
-
crcp 55
-
colorado rules of civil procedure lexis
-
premises liability interrogatories to defendant
-
slip and fall interrogatories to defendant
Interesting Questions
My full name is [Plaintiff's Full Name] and my address is [Plaintiff's Address]. You can contact me at [Plaintiff's Contact Information].
On [date], [describe the incident in simple language]. This incident led to my claim against Aurora Discovery.
Yes/No. If yes, provide details of any previous lawsuits or claims related to this matter.
Please provide the names and contact information of anyone who witnessed or has knowledge of the incident mentioned in your claim.
Yes/No. If yes, please provide details of any medical treatment or consultation sought, along with copies of relevant medical records.
Please provide a list of all documents, photos, or other evidence that you possess and believe support your claim against Aurora Discovery.
More info
Plaintiff, Alireza Vazirabadi, represents himself in this case. Defendant. ORDER. Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge.Before the Court is "Plaintiff's Motion To Compel Production of Documents, Discovery,. And respond to member questions and information requests. She has written articles and presented on various workers' compensation topics.
At a public hearing, plaintiff spoke about his personal experience and how he received his compensation. He stated that the money he received from workers compensation resulted largely from his injury that resulted in him falling off a boat that was being towed. He stated that he was on the other side of the lake when his hand got stuck in a tow-rope to retrieve the boat. Furthermore, he felt the hand of the hand that was tied to the line and the pain he got from the pain he felt was so strong he could not move his thumb. In addition, one of the doctors stated in the case that the “vast majority” of his injuries were the result of a fall, and he stated that he is more inclined to agree with that diagnosis than the experts. The other doctors in the case stated that the majority were the result of “accidents involving medical error” in which the injured party is to blame for the injury. There are seven articles for which plaintiff has written.
Disclaimer
The materials in this section are taken from public sources. We disclaim all representations or any warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, authenticity, reliability, accessibility, adequacy, or completeness of any data in this paragraph. Nevertheless, we make every effort to cite public sources deemed reliable and trustworthy.
At a public hearing, plaintiff spoke about his personal experience and how he received his compensation. He stated that the money he received from workers compensation resulted largely from his injury that resulted in him falling off a boat that was being towed. He stated that he was on the other side of the lake when his hand got stuck in a tow-rope to retrieve the boat. Furthermore, he felt the hand of the hand that was tied to the line and the pain he got from the pain he felt was so strong he could not move his thumb. In addition, one of the doctors stated in the case that the “vast majority” of his injuries were the result of a fall, and he stated that he is more inclined to agree with that diagnosis than the experts. The other doctors in the case stated that the majority were the result of “accidents involving medical error” in which the injured party is to blame for the injury. There are seven articles for which plaintiff has written.
Disclaimer
The materials in this section are taken from public sources. We disclaim all representations or any warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, authenticity, reliability, accessibility, adequacy, or completeness of any data in this paragraph. Nevertheless, we make every effort to cite public sources deemed reliable and trustworthy.
Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies
Aurora Colorado Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests
Change state
To change the state, select it from the list below and press Change state.
Changing the state redirects you to another page.
Colorado
Change state
-
No results found.
-
Colorado
-
Alabama
-
Alaska
-
Arizona
-
Arkansas
-
California
-
Connecticut
-
Delaware
-
District of Columbia
-
Florida
-
Georgia
-
Hawaii
-
Idaho
-
Illinois
-
Indiana
-
Iowa
-
Kentucky
-
Louisiana
-
Maine
-
Maryland
-
Massachusetts
-
Michigan
-
Minnesota
-
Mississippi
-
Missouri
-
Montana
-
Nebraska
-
Nevada
-
New Mexico
-
New York
-
North Carolina
-
North Dakota
-
Ohio
-
Oklahoma
-
Oregon
-
Pennsylvania
-
Rhode Island
-
South Dakota
-
Tennessee
-
Texas
-
Utah
-
Vermont
-
Washington
-
West Virginia
-
Wisconsin
-
Wyoming
Law summary
Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests
Note: This summary is not intended to be an all-inclusive
summary of discovery law in Colorado, but does include basic and other
information.
Definitions
Discovery: A procedure designed to allow disclosure of information between Plaintiffs and Defendants. Written questions, oral questioning, document production and admissions requests are generally allowed. Discovery was designed to to prevent trial by ambush.
Interrogatories: Written questions from Plaintiff to Defendant, or from Defendant to Plaintiff. The questions are mailed to the Plaintiff, Defendant or the attorney for response in writing. The answers or responses are usually due between 20-30 days.
Deposition: A procedure where verbal questions are asked a Plaintiff or Defendant for immediate response. Depositions are usually recorded by a court reporter, who swears the person to tell the truth before questioning begins.
Production of Documents: The method of obtaining documents from the other party relevant to the case such as all documents a party intends to introduce at trial.
Requests for Admissions: Written questions where you request the other party to admit or deny some relevant fact.
Objections: Objections may be made to all discovery questions if the questions are not relevant, or likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.
Civil Procedure Rules: Virtually all states have adopted a version of civil procedure rules which include rules dealing with discovery.
Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure
Colorado has adopted the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. The discovery rules also apply in divorce actions. However, the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure provide that Rule 26 does not apply to domestic relations proceedings because of the timing and interrelationship with Rule 16. Therefore, Rule 16.2 and Rule 26.2 were created to address the needs of case management and discovery in domestic relations matters. The differences from Rule 26 are as follows: mandatory disclosures are designed to provide basic information that is generally required in all domestic relations cases; the difference in the sequence and timing of the mandatory automatic disclosures is based on the recognition that many domestic relations matters are expedited proceedings; discovery limitations have been slightly increased; and the parties rather than the attorneys are required to sign the mandatory disclosures to avoid excessive costs in divorce cases.
Duty of Disclosure: This rule will apply in all district court actions under Articles 10,11, and 13 of Title 14 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, including all post-decree or modification matters. Except to the extent otherwise directed by the court, a party shall, without awaiting a discovery request provide to other parties: a complete financial affidavit; a complete copy of a personal federal and state income tax returns for the three years preceding the filing of the petition or post-decree motion; pay stubs or statements of earnings from all employers for the three months preceding the filing of the petition or post-decree motion; a complete copy of federal income tax returns for the three years preceding the filing of the petition or post-decree motion for any corporation or business; any available information relating to a pension, profit sharing, deferred compensation; and retirement plans. Rule 26.2(a)(1)
Discovery of Expert Testimony: In addition to the disclosures required by subsection (a)(1) of this Rule, a party shall disclose to other parties the identity of any person who may present evidence at the hearing, pursuant to Rules 702, 703, or 705 of the Colorado Rules of Evidence.
Methods to Discover Additional Matters: Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property, pursuant to C.R.C.P. 34; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission. Discovery at a place within a country having a treaty with the United States applicable to the discovery must be conducted by methods authorized by the treaty except that, if the court determines that those methods are inadequate or inequitable, it may authorize other discovery methods not prohibited by the treaty. Rule 26.2(a)(2)
Discovery Scope and Limits: Subject to the limitations and considerations contained in subsection (b)(2) of this Rule, parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. Rule 26.2(b)(1)
Hearing Preparation (Materials): Subject to the provisions of subsection (b)(4) of this Rule, a party may obtain discovery of documents and tangible things otherwise discoverable under subsection (b)(1) of this Rule and prepared in anticipation of litigation or for the hearing by or for another party or by or for that other party's representative (including the party's attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer, or agent) only upon a showing that the party seeking discovery has substantial need of the materials in the preparation of the case and is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means. In ordering discovery of such materials when the required showing has been made, the court shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the litigation. Rule 26.2(b)(3)
Hearing Preparation (Experts): A party may depose any person who has been identified as an expert whose opinions may be presented at hearing. Except to the extent otherwise stipulated by the parties or ordered by the court, no discovery, including depositions, concerning either the identity or the opinion of experts shall be conducted until after the disclosures required by subsection (a)(2) of this Rule. Rule 26.2(b)(4)
Sequence of Discovery: Unless the court orders otherwise, the methods of discovery may be used in any sequence. Rule 26.2(d)
Supplementation of Disclosures and Responses: A party is under a duty to supplement its disclosures under section (a) of this Rule when the party learns that in some material respect the information disclosed is incomplete or incorrect and if the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made known to the other parties during the disclosure or discovery process. Rule 26.2(e)
Signing of Disclosures: Every disclosure made pursuant to subsections (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this Rule shall be signed by the party. Rule 26.2(g)
Depositions
Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken: Depositions outside the State of Colorado shall be taken only upon proof that notice to take deposition has been given as provided in these rules. The deposition shall be taken before an officer authorized to administer oaths by the laws of this state, the United States or the place where the examination is to be held, or before a person appointed by the court in which the action is pending. A person so appointed has the power to administer oaths and take testimony. Rule 28(a)
Stipulations: Unless otherwise directed by the court, the parties may by written stipulation: (1) provide that depositions may be taken before any person, at any time or place, upon any notice, and in any manner and when so taken may be used like other depositions; and (2) modify other procedures governing the timing of discovery, except that stipulations extending the time provided in C.R.C.P. Rules 33, 34, and 36 for responses to discovery may, if they would interfere with any time set for completion of discovery, for hearing of a motion, or for trial, be made only with the approval of the court. Rule 29
Interrogatories
Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories, not exceeding the number, including all discrete subparts, set forth in the Case Management Order, to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public or private corporation, or a partnership, or association, or governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is available to the party. Rule 33
Production
To produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on the party's behalf, to inspect and copy any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent through detection devices into reasonably usable form), or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things which constitute or contain matters within the scope of C.R.C.P. 26(b) and which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or
To permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the scope of C.R.C.P. 26(b). Rule 34
Physical and Mental Examinations of Persons
When the mental or physical condition (including the blood group) of a party, or of a person in the custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy, the court in which the action is pending may order the party to submit to a physical or mental examination by a suitably licensed or certified examiner or to produce for examination the person in his or her custody or legal control. The order may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person to be examined and to all parties and shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made. Rule 35(a)
Requests for Admissions
Subject to the limitations contained in the Case Management Order, a party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of C.R.C.P. 26(b) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Rule 36(a)
Compel Discovery
A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling disclosure or discovery. Rule 37(a)
Domestic Actions Discovery Notes
If you require extra time to respond to discovery, you should ask the other side for an extension in writing. It may also be necessary to enter an order granting the extension to protect your rights.
Discovery questions are limited in number so select the most important questions to ask the other side. Don't waste your requests writing questions that you already know the answer to.
Legal definition
Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests
Note: This summary is not intended to be an all-inclusive
summary of discovery law in Colorado, but does include basic and other
information.
Definitions
Discovery: A procedure designed to allow disclosure of information between Plaintiffs and Defendants. Written questions, oral questioning, document production and admissions requests are generally allowed. Discovery was designed to to prevent trial by ambush.
Interrogatories: Written questions from Plaintiff to Defendant, or from Defendant to Plaintiff. The questions are mailed to the Plaintiff, Defendant or the attorney for response in writing. The answers or responses are usually due between 20-30 days.
Deposition: A procedure where verbal questions are asked a Plaintiff or Defendant for immediate response. Depositions are usually recorded by a court reporter, who swears the person to tell the truth before questioning begins.
Production of Documents: The method of obtaining documents from the other party relevant to the case such as all documents a party intends to introduce at trial.
Requests for Admissions: Written questions where you request the other party to admit or deny some relevant fact.
Objections: Objections may be made to all discovery questions if the questions are not relevant, or likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.
Civil Procedure Rules: Virtually all states have adopted a version of civil procedure rules which include rules dealing with discovery.
Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure
Colorado has adopted the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. The discovery rules also apply in divorce actions. However, the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure provide that Rule 26 does not apply to domestic relations proceedings because of the timing and interrelationship with Rule 16. Therefore, Rule 16.2 and Rule 26.2 were created to address the needs of case management and discovery in domestic relations matters. The differences from Rule 26 are as follows: mandatory disclosures are designed to provide basic information that is generally required in all domestic relations cases; the difference in the sequence and timing of the mandatory automatic disclosures is based on the recognition that many domestic relations matters are expedited proceedings; discovery limitations have been slightly increased; and the parties rather than the attorneys are required to sign the mandatory disclosures to avoid excessive costs in divorce cases.
Duty of Disclosure: This rule will apply in all district court actions under Articles 10,11, and 13 of Title 14 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, including all post-decree or modification matters. Except to the extent otherwise directed by the court, a party shall, without awaiting a discovery request provide to other parties: a complete financial affidavit; a complete copy of a personal federal and state income tax returns for the three years preceding the filing of the petition or post-decree motion; pay stubs or statements of earnings from all employers for the three months preceding the filing of the petition or post-decree motion; a complete copy of federal income tax returns for the three years preceding the filing of the petition or post-decree motion for any corporation or business; any available information relating to a pension, profit sharing, deferred compensation; and retirement plans. Rule 26.2(a)(1)
Discovery of Expert Testimony: In addition to the disclosures required by subsection (a)(1) of this Rule, a party shall disclose to other parties the identity of any person who may present evidence at the hearing, pursuant to Rules 702, 703, or 705 of the Colorado Rules of Evidence.
Methods to Discover Additional Matters: Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property, pursuant to C.R.C.P. 34; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission. Discovery at a place within a country having a treaty with the United States applicable to the discovery must be conducted by methods authorized by the treaty except that, if the court determines that those methods are inadequate or inequitable, it may authorize other discovery methods not prohibited by the treaty. Rule 26.2(a)(2)
Discovery Scope and Limits: Subject to the limitations and considerations contained in subsection (b)(2) of this Rule, parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. Rule 26.2(b)(1)
Hearing Preparation (Materials): Subject to the provisions of subsection (b)(4) of this Rule, a party may obtain discovery of documents and tangible things otherwise discoverable under subsection (b)(1) of this Rule and prepared in anticipation of litigation or for the hearing by or for another party or by or for that other party's representative (including the party's attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer, or agent) only upon a showing that the party seeking discovery has substantial need of the materials in the preparation of the case and is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means. In ordering discovery of such materials when the required showing has been made, the court shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the litigation. Rule 26.2(b)(3)
Hearing Preparation (Experts): A party may depose any person who has been identified as an expert whose opinions may be presented at hearing. Except to the extent otherwise stipulated by the parties or ordered by the court, no discovery, including depositions, concerning either the identity or the opinion of experts shall be conducted until after the disclosures required by subsection (a)(2) of this Rule. Rule 26.2(b)(4)
Sequence of Discovery: Unless the court orders otherwise, the methods of discovery may be used in any sequence. Rule 26.2(d)
Supplementation of Disclosures and Responses: A party is under a duty to supplement its disclosures under section (a) of this Rule when the party learns that in some material respect the information disclosed is incomplete or incorrect and if the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made known to the other parties during the disclosure or discovery process. Rule 26.2(e)
Signing of Disclosures: Every disclosure made pursuant to subsections (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this Rule shall be signed by the party. Rule 26.2(g)
Depositions
Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken: Depositions outside the State of Colorado shall be taken only upon proof that notice to take deposition has been given as provided in these rules. The deposition shall be taken before an officer authorized to administer oaths by the laws of this state, the United States or the place where the examination is to be held, or before a person appointed by the court in which the action is pending. A person so appointed has the power to administer oaths and take testimony. Rule 28(a)
Stipulations: Unless otherwise directed by the court, the parties may by written stipulation: (1) provide that depositions may be taken before any person, at any time or place, upon any notice, and in any manner and when so taken may be used like other depositions; and (2) modify other procedures governing the timing of discovery, except that stipulations extending the time provided in C.R.C.P. Rules 33, 34, and 36 for responses to discovery may, if they would interfere with any time set for completion of discovery, for hearing of a motion, or for trial, be made only with the approval of the court. Rule 29
Interrogatories
Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories, not exceeding the number, including all discrete subparts, set forth in the Case Management Order, to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public or private corporation, or a partnership, or association, or governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is available to the party. Rule 33
Production
To produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on the party's behalf, to inspect and copy any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent through detection devices into reasonably usable form), or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things which constitute or contain matters within the scope of C.R.C.P. 26(b) and which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or
To permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the scope of C.R.C.P. 26(b). Rule 34
Physical and Mental Examinations of Persons
When the mental or physical condition (including the blood group) of a party, or of a person in the custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy, the court in which the action is pending may order the party to submit to a physical or mental examination by a suitably licensed or certified examiner or to produce for examination the person in his or her custody or legal control. The order may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person to be examined and to all parties and shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made. Rule 35(a)
Requests for Admissions
Subject to the limitations contained in the Case Management Order, a party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of C.R.C.P. 26(b) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Rule 36(a)
Compel Discovery
A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling disclosure or discovery. Rule 37(a)
Domestic Actions Discovery Notes
If you require extra time to respond to discovery, you should ask the other side for an extension in writing. It may also be necessary to enter an order granting the extension to protect your rights.
Discovery questions are limited in number so select the most important questions to ask the other side. Don't waste your requests writing questions that you already know the answer to.
Sorry, this device is not supported
Please open this page on your desktop computer.