Ann Arbor Michigan Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery

State:
Michigan
City:
Ann Arbor
Control #:
MI-BM-080-03-F
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download
This website is not affiliated with any governmental entity
Public form

Description

A motion to compel asks the court to enforce a request for information relevant to a case.

The Ann Arbor Michigan Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery is a legal document filed by the plaintiff in a civil case in Ann Arbor, Michigan. It requests the court to order the opposing party to provide requested information or documents that have not been provided during the discovery process. Basically, when parties are involved in a lawsuit, they exchange information regarding the case through the process called discovery. This includes requests for documents, interrogatories (written questions), and depositions (oral statements). However, sometimes the opposing party fails to comply with these requests, which can hinder the progress of the case. That's when the plaintiff may file a Motion to Compel Discovery to request the court's intervention. In Ann Arbor, different types of Plaintiff's Motions to Compel Discovery may be filed, depending on the specific circumstances of the case. Some common types include: 1. Document Production: The plaintiff requests the court to compel the opposing party to produce specific documents requested during the discovery process that have not been provided. 2. Interrogatory Answers: The plaintiff asks the court to compel the opposing party to fully answer written interrogatories that were submitted as part of the discovery requests. 3. Deposition Testimony: The plaintiff seeks the court's intervention to compel the opposing party or a witness to provide clear and complete answers during a deposition, a formal questioning under oath. 4. ESI (Electronically Stored Information) Disclosure: In cases involving digital evidence, the plaintiff may file a motion to compel the opposing party to provide access and disclosure to relevant electronic documents, emails, social media posts, or any other electronic data. The Ann Arbor Michigan Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery is an essential tool to ensure fairness and transparency in the litigation process. It allows the plaintiff to obtain the necessary information to build their case and move the lawsuit forward.

How to fill out Ann Arbor Michigan Plaintiff's Motion To Compel Discovery?

Take advantage of the US Legal Forms and gain immediate access to any form sample you need.

Our user-friendly platform with a vast array of documents simplifies the process of locating and acquiring almost any document sample you seek.

You can download, complete, and sign the Ann Arbor Michigan Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery in just minutes rather than spending countless hours searching the web for a suitable template.

Utilizing our collection is an excellent way to enhance the security of your document filing.

The Download option will be available on all the samples you view. Additionally, you can access all previously saved documents in the My documents section.

If you don’t have an account yet, follow the steps outlined below: Locate the form you need. Confirm that it is indeed the template you were searching for: review its title and description, and utilize the Preview feature when it is available. Otherwise, utilize the Search bar to find the requisite one.

  1. Our knowledgeable attorneys frequently review all the documents to verify that the templates are suitable for specific areas and compliant with current laws and regulations.
  2. How can you access the Ann Arbor Michigan Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery.
  3. If you have a subscription, simply Log In to your account.

Form popularity

FAQ

If the motion is based on the failure to serve answers, proof of service of the interrogatories must be filed with the motion. The motion must state that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the party not making the disclosure in an effort to secure the disclosure without court action.

The opposing party/counsel shall have 15 days after being served with both the motion and the notice to file a response.

When that happens, a party can file a motion to compel, asking the Court to order the opposing party to produce the contested documents or information. If a motion to compel is granted and the Court orders the information produced, failing to comply with that order can lead to serious consequences.

A motion to compel asks the court to order either the opposing party or a third party to take some action. This sort of motion most commonly deals with discovery disputes, when a party who has propounded discovery to either the opposing party or a third party believes that the discovery responses are insufficient.

A motion to compel asks the court to order either the opposing party or a third party to take some action. This sort of motion most commonly deals with discovery disputes, when a party who has propounded discovery to either the opposing party or a third party believes that the discovery responses are insufficient.

A Motion to Compel is a formal request to the Court to require a party or a non-party in a lawsuit to comply with a discovery request such as a request for production, request for admission, interrogatory, or subpoena.

The motion to compel further responses has to be brought within 45 days of service of the response.

Interrogatories are to be raised at a pre-trial stage and must have a close connection with the matter in question, whereas cross examinations have a wider scope of questions that can be asked.

(i) A party that files a complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party complaint must serve its initial disclosures within 14 days after any opposing party files an answer to that pleading.

Motion for Sanctions ? If the court issues an order compelling discovery, and the party fails to comply with that order, then the court may sanction the party in numerous ways such as refusing to let in the party's evidence at trial, dismissing their lawsuit, or striking their defense to a lawsuit, and imposing

Interesting Questions

More info

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION. Ka'Nea Kenyetta Brooks, Honigman LLP, Ann Arbor, MI, Mohamed M. Awan, Honigman LLP, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff.Plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery will be DENIED. Get free access to the complete judgment in Four Fibers, L.L.C. v. Mr. Easthope's Depositions Until Critical Discovery Is. Produced. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. Subject to an order compelling discovery in a lawsuit challenging official acts. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan. On March 10, 2009, Mr. Forner filed a Motion to Compel Consumers to answer his discovery request of February 18. Citing text will, at some later point, be revised to fill in the gaps.

In the meantime, the Court orders Mr. Former to wait until the Court orders him to produce. (Hearing Ex. 5 (Motion for Summary Judgment) at 3-4.) The Court may also require defendant to produce a list of documents requested for which he is not currently producing or for which he does not have reasonable cause to withhold. (See “Disclosure to Defendants, on Requests” at Part (Hearing Ex. 5). No. 5. The Court's orders.) After the final order is issued, the Court orders defendant to comply at its earliest reasonable opportunity. Plaintiffs respectfully request that any final order require Defendant to produce the requested documents within a reasonable time. (Hearing Ex 5.) [1] See In re L.L.C. (No. 00-1135) and, In re L.L.C. (No. 17-2139). Plaintiff's discovery request of February 18, 2009, was filed on February 20, 2009. (See Hearings Ex. 1 at 29.) Ms.

Disclaimer
The materials in this section are taken from public sources. We disclaim all representations or any warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, authenticity, reliability, accessibility, adequacy, or completeness of any data in this paragraph. Nevertheless, we make every effort to cite public sources deemed reliable and trustworthy.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Ann Arbor Michigan Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery