US Legal Forms
Localized Forms
North Carolina
Wilmington
North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff...

Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests

Name: Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests
Brand: US Legal Forms
Rating: 4.73 (336 reviews)

Category:

Family Law - Divorce - Discovery - Interrogatories

State:

North Carolina

City:

Wilmington

Control #:

NC-021A-D

Format:

Instant download

Description

This form, Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests, is a sample of interrogatories for the Defendant in a Divorce action to ask the Plaintiff. It also includes requests for production of documents. You should only use this form as a guide and delete questions not relevant to your case, as well as add questions you or your client want to ask the Plaintiff based upon the facts of your case. This form includes the separate Notice of Filing of Discovery to be filed with the Court Clerk.
Wilmington, North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests are a crucial component of the legal process in civil litigation cases. Discovery interrogatories refer to written questions presented by the defendant to the plaintiff as part of the pre-trial discovery phase. These interrogatories aim to extract information from the plaintiff, allowing the defendant to gather facts, evidence, and details related to the case. Additionally, production requests demand the plaintiff to produce relevant documents, records, or other tangible items for inspection and examination. In Wilmington, North Carolina, various types of discovery interrogatories and production requests exist, which include: 1. General Interrogatories: These interrogatories typically seek to gain a broad understanding of the plaintiff's claims, defenses, and relevant facts. They may cover topics such as the plaintiff's identification, the basis of the lawsuit, and any witnesses or evidence supporting their case. 2. Specific Interrogatories: Specific interrogatories are more focused and target particular aspects of the plaintiff's claims. These can address specific incidents, dates, parties involved, or any relevant details that may assist the defendant in assessing the validity of the plaintiff's case. 3. Request for Production of Documents: This type of request aims to procure specific documents, records, or tangible items related to the case. The defendant may seek copies of contracts, correspondence, medical records, financial statements, or any other evidence relevant to the claims made by the plaintiff. 4. Request for Admissions: Request for admissions involves presenting statements or facts to the plaintiff, which they are asked to either admit or deny. These requests aim to narrow the issues at hand by establishing certain facts that can be agreed upon before trial. 5. Request for Expert Witness Information: If the plaintiff intends to rely on expert testimony during the trial, the defendant may request details regarding the expert's qualifications, opinions, reports, and any related materials. This allows the defendant to prepare for a response or potentially challenge the expert's credibility. In Wilmington, North Carolina, these discovery interrogatories and production requests play a fundamental role in ensuring a fair and comprehensive examination of the case. They provide defendants with an opportunity to gather pertinent information, evaluate the strength of the plaintiff's claims, and ultimately, prepare a solid defense strategy.

Wilmington, North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests are a crucial component of the legal process in civil litigation cases. Discovery interrogatories refer to written questions presented by the defendant to the plaintiff as part of the pre-trial discovery phase. These interrogatories aim to extract information from the plaintiff, allowing the defendant to gather facts, evidence, and details related to the case. Additionally, production requests demand the plaintiff to produce relevant documents, records, or other tangible items for inspection and examination. In Wilmington, North Carolina, various types of discovery interrogatories and production requests exist, which include: 1. General Interrogatories: These interrogatories typically seek to gain a broad understanding of the plaintiff's claims, defenses, and relevant facts. They may cover topics such as the plaintiff's identification, the basis of the lawsuit, and any witnesses or evidence supporting their case. 2. Specific Interrogatories: Specific interrogatories are more focused and target particular aspects of the plaintiff's claims. These can address specific incidents, dates, parties involved, or any relevant details that may assist the defendant in assessing the validity of the plaintiff's case. 3. Request for Production of Documents: This type of request aims to procure specific documents, records, or tangible items related to the case. The defendant may seek copies of contracts, correspondence, medical records, financial statements, or any other evidence relevant to the claims made by the plaintiff. 4. Request for Admissions: Request for admissions involves presenting statements or facts to the plaintiff, which they are asked to either admit or deny. These requests aim to narrow the issues at hand by establishing certain facts that can be agreed upon before trial. 5. Request for Expert Witness Information: If the plaintiff intends to rely on expert testimony during the trial, the defendant may request details regarding the expert's qualifications, opinions, reports, and any related materials. This allows the defendant to prepare for a response or potentially challenge the expert's credibility. In Wilmington, North Carolina, these discovery interrogatories and production requests play a fundamental role in ensuring a fair and comprehensive examination of the case. They provide defendants with an opportunity to gather pertinent information, evaluate the strength of the plaintiff's claims, and ultimately, prepare a solid defense strategy.

San Bernardino Disposiciones en cuanto a la remuneración del contrato del director médico con la agencia de atención médica

View this form

Tarrant Disposiciones en cuanto a la remuneración del contrato del director médico con la agencia de atención médica

View this form

Bexar Disposiciones en cuanto a la remuneración del contrato del director médico con la agencia de atención médica

View this form

Broward Disposiciones en cuanto a la remuneración del contrato del director médico con la agencia de atención médica

View this form

Santa Clara Disposiciones en cuanto a la remuneración del contrato del director médico con la agencia de atención médica

View this form

Sample Letter to Chancery Clerk with Check...

View this form

Price to be Fixed by Appraisal Clauses: Co...

View this form

Home based Worker Checklist

View this form

Stock Option Agreement of VIA Internet, Inc.

View this form

Complaint For Wrongful Interference With R...

View this form

An Ordinance Authorizing Proclamation of S...

View this form

Proposal to amend the articles of incorpor...

View this form

Arbitration Case Submission Form

View this form

Notice of Option for Recording

View this form

Judgment by Default - B 261A

View this form

How to fill out Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories From Defendant To Plaintiff With Production Requests?

If you’ve already utilized our service before, log in to your account and download the Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests on your device by clicking the Download button. Make sure your subscription is valid. Otherwise, renew it in accordance with your payment plan.

If this is your first experience with our service, adhere to these simple steps to get your file:

Make sure you’ve found a suitable document. Read the description and use the Preview option, if any, to check if it meets your requirements. If it doesn’t fit you, use the Search tab above to obtain the appropriate one.
Purchase the template. Click the Buy Now button and choose a monthly or annual subscription plan.
Register an account and make a payment. Use your credit card details or the PayPal option to complete the purchase.
Obtain your Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests. Choose the file format for your document and save it to your device.
Fill out your sample. Print it out or take advantage of professional online editors to fill it out and sign it electronically.

You have permanent access to each piece of paperwork you have purchased: you can locate it in your profile within the My Forms menu whenever you need to reuse it again. Take advantage of the US Legal Forms service to easily find and save any template for your personal or professional needs!

Form popularity

FAQ

The interrogatory rule in North Carolina outlines how parties can exchange written questions and answers during the discovery phase. Specifically, these rules govern Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests, ensuring that each party responds to inquiries within a specific time frame. This promotes transparency and aids in the preparation of legal strategies. For more detailed guidance on these rules, uslegalforms offers valuable resources to help navigate your legal obligations.

A request for production to a plaintiff is a legal tool used to obtain documents and other evidence relevant to the case at hand. In Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests, defendants can specify what materials they need from plaintiffs, such as contracts, emails, or photographs. This process helps ensure both parties exchange essential information, promoting fairer outcomes. By utilizing platforms like uslegalforms, you can simplify this process and create tailored requests.

Requests for production are distinct from interrogatories, but they serve a similar purpose in the discovery process. Specifically, Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests allow defendants to gather information. While interrogatories involve written questions requiring answers, requests for production seek documents and tangible evidence. Understanding this difference is crucial for effective case preparation.

An interrogatory requires a party to provide detailed written responses to specific questions about a case, while a request for admission aims to establish certain facts as true, reducing the number of issues to be resolved at trial. Both tools serve different roles in the discovery process, helping parties clarify their positions. By understanding Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests, you can effectively use these methods to your advantage during your legal journey.

An interrogatory or request for production may be objectionable if it is overly broad, irrelevant to the case, or seeks privileged information. Additionally, if the request imposes an unreasonable burden or is not proportional to the needs of the case, it can be challenged. Always ensure your responses align with Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests to avoid complications and potential sanctions.

Yes, a request for production is indeed a fundamental part of the discovery phase in the legal process. This allows parties to request specific documents and evidence that are pertinent to the case, enabling a clearer understanding of the facts. Utilizing Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests helps both sides gather the necessary information to support their claims or defenses efficiently.

Interrogatories involve written questions that one party sends to another, requiring detailed responses about facts relevant to the case. In contrast, a request for production seeks documents, records, or any tangible items that support the arguments in a legal proceeding. Understanding these differences is crucial while navigating Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests, as each serves a distinct purpose in the discovery process.

To effectively answer Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests, you should read each question carefully, analyze the information requested, and respond in a clear and concise manner. Be sure to provide full and honest answers, as incomplete responses may lead to further complications. If any documents are being requested, gather and produce them alongside your answers to ensure compliance and clarity.

If a plaintiff does not answer interrogatories in the Wilmington North Carolina Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests process, it can lead to significant consequences. The defendant may file a motion to compel, urging the court to enforce compliance. Additionally, the court might impose sanctions on the plaintiff, which could include fines or even dismissal of the case. Therefore, it is crucial for plaintiffs to respond timely and thoroughly to avoid these potential pitfalls.

More info

On 3 March 2015, defendant served on plaintiff its first set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents. (Disc. Reqs. (D. See Defendant's Motion to Compel Complete Responses to Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents, 11 5.Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Case opinion for NC Court of Appeals VENTERS v. Document Discovery. 31. Lead Plaintiffs served their first requests for production of documents on. Substitute for responses to Plaintiffs' discovery requests. Response to a discovery request for legislative emails in a civil lawsuit against the State of.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Discovery Interrogatories from Defendant to Plaintiff with Production Requests

Note: This summary is not intended to be an all inclusive summary of discovery law in North Carolina, but does include basic and other information.

Definitions

Discovery: A procedure designed to allow disclosure of information between Plaintiffs and Defendants.

Written questions, oral questioning, document production and admissions requests are generally allowed. Discovery was designed to to prevent trial by ambush.

Interrogatories: Written questions from Plaintiff to Defendant, or from Defendant to Plaintiff.

The questions are mailed to the Plaintiff, Defendant or the attorney for response in writing. The answers or responses are usually due between 20-30 days.

Deposition: A procedure where verbal questions are asked to a Plaintiff or Defendant for immediate response.

Depositions are usually recorded by a court reporter, who swears the person to tell the truth before questioning begins.

Production of Documents: The method of obtaining documents from the other party relevant to the case such as all documents a party intends to introduce at trial.

Requests for Admissions: Written questions where you request the other party to admit or deny some relevant fact.

Objections: Objections may be made to all discovery questions if the questions are not relevant, or likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.

Civil Procedure Rules: Virtually all states have adopted a version of civil procedure rules which include rules dealing with discovery.

North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure

North Carolina has adopted the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure which contain rules governing discovery. The discovery rules also apply in divorce actions.

Discovery Methods:

Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property, for inspection and other purposes; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission. Rule 26(a)

Scope:

Unless otherwise limited by order of the court in accordance with these rules, the scope of discovery is as follows:

In General:

Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. It is not ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence nor is it grounds for objection that the examining party has knowledge of the information as to which discovery is sought.

The frequency or extent of use of the discovery methods set forth in section (a) shall be limited by the court if it determines that: (i) the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or is obtainable from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; (ii) the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain the information sought; or (iii) the discovery is unduly burdensome or expensive, taking into account the needs of the case, the amount in controversy, limitations on the parties' resources, and the importance of the issues at stake in the litigation. The court may act upon its own initiative after reasonable notice or pursuant to a motion under section (c). Rule 26(b)

Experts:

Discovery of facts known and opinions held by experts, otherwise discoverable under the provisions of subsection (b)(1) of this rule and acquired or developed in anticipation of litigation or for trial, may be obtained only as follows:

a. 1. A party may through interrogatories require any other party to identify each person whom the other party expects to call as an expert witness at trial, to state the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, and to state the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion.

2. Upon motion, the court may order further discovery by other means, subject to such restrictions as to scope and such provisions, pursuant to subdivision (b)(4)c [(b)(4)b] of this rule, concerning fees and expenses as the court may deem appropriate.

b. Unless manifest injustice would result, (i) the court shall require that the party seeking discovery pay the expert a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery under subdivision (b)(4)a2 of this rule; and (ii) with respect to discovery obtained under subdivision (b)(4)a2 of this rule the court may require the party seeking discovery to pay the other party a fair portion of the fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the latter party in obtaining facts and opinions from the expert. Rule 26(b)(4)

Sequence and Timing of Discovery:

Unless the court upon motion, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice, orders otherwise, methods of discovery may be used in any sequence and the fact that a party is conducting discovery, whether by deposition or otherwise, shall not operate to delay any other party's discovery. Any order or rule of court setting the time within which discovery must be completed shall be construed to fix the date after which the pendency of discovery will not be allowed to delay trial or any other proceeding before the court, but shall not be construed to prevent any party from utilizing any procedures afforded under Rules 26 through 36, so long as trial or any hearing before the court is not thereby delayed. Rule 26(d)

Supplementation of Responses:

A party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when made is under no duty to supplement his response to include information thereafter acquired, except as follows:

(1) A party is under a duty seasonably to supplement his response with respect to any question directly addressed to (i) the identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable matters, and (ii) the identity of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at trial, the subject matter on which he is expected to testify, and the substance of his testimony.

(2) A party is under a duty seasonably to amend a prior response if he obtains information upon the basis of which (i) he knows that the response was incorrect when made, or (ii) he knows that the response though correct when made is no longer true and the circumstances are such that a failure to amend the response is in substance a knowing concealment.

(3) A duty to supplement responses may be imposed by order of the court, agreement of the parties, or at any time prior to trial through new requests for supplementation of prior responses. Rule 26(e)

Discovery Conference:

At any time after commencement of an action the court may direct the attorneys for the parties to appear before it for a conference on the subject of discovery. Rule 26(f)

Depositions

Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken:

Within the United States or within a territory or insular possession subject to the dominion of the United States, depositions shall be taken before a person authorized to administer oaths by the laws of this State, of the United States or of the place where the examination is held, or before a person appointed by the court in which the action is pending. A person so appointed has power to administer oaths and take testimony. Rule 28(a)

Depositions may be taken in a foreign country:

(1) Pursuant to any applicable treaty or convention;

(2) Pursuant to a letter of request, whether or not captioned a letter rogatory;

(3) On notice before a person authorized to administer oaths in the place where the examination is held, either by the law thereof or by the law of the United States; or

(4) Before a person commissioned by the court, and a person so commissioned shall have the power by virtue of his commission to administer any necessary oath and take testimony. A commission or a letter of request shall be issued on application and notice and on terms that are just and appropriate. It is not requisite to the issuance of a commission or a letter of request that the taking of the deposition in any other manner is impracticable or inconvenient; and both a commission and a letter of request may be issued in proper cases. A notice or commission may designate the person before whom the deposition is to be taken either by name or descriptive title. A letter of request may be addressed "To the Appropriate Authority in (here name the country)." When a letter of request or any other device is used pursuant to any applicable treaty or convention, it shall be captioned in the form prescribed by that treaty or convention. Evidence obtained in response to a letter of request need not be excluded merely because the testimony was not taken under oath, or any similar departure from the requirements for depositions taken within the United States under these rules. Rule 28(b)

Stipulations:

Unless the court orders otherwise, the parties may by written stipulation (i) provide that depositions may be taken before any person, at any time or place, upon any notice, and in any manner and when so taken may be used like other depositions, and (ii) modify the procedures provided by these rules for other methods of discovery. Rule 29

After commencement of the action, any party may take the testimony of any person, including a party, by deposition upon oral examination. Leave of court, granted with or without notice, must be obtained only if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition prior to the expiration of 30 days after service of the summons and complaint upon any defendant or service made under Rule 4(e), except that leave is not required (i) if a defendant has served a notice of taking deposition or otherwise sought discovery, or (ii) if special notice is given as provided in subsection (b)(2) of this rule. The attendance of witnesses may be compelled by subpoena as provided in Rule 45, provided that no subpoena need be served on a deponent who is a party or an officer, director or managing agent of a party, provided the party has been served with notice pursuant to section (b)(1) of this rule. The deposition of a person confined in prison or of a patient receiving in-patient care in or confined to an institution or hospital for the mentally ill or mentally handicapped may be taken only by leave of court on such terms as the court prescribes. Rule 30(a)

(1) A party desiring to take the deposition of any person upon oral examination shall give notice in writing to every other party to the action. The notice shall state the time and place for taking the deposition and the name and address of each person to be examined, if known, and, if the name is not known, a general description sufficient to identify him or the particular class or group to which he belongs. If a subpoena duces tecum is to be served on the person to be examined, the designation of the materials to be produced as set forth in the subpoena shall be attached to or included in the notice. The notice shall be served on all parties at least 15 days prior to the taking of the deposition when any party required to be served resides without the State and shall be served on all parties at least 10 days prior to the taking of the deposition when all of the parties required to be served reside within the State. Depositions of parties, officers, directors or managing agents of parties or of other persons designated pursuant to subsection (b)(6) hereof to testify on behalf of a party may be taken only at the following places:

A resident of the State may be required to attend for examination by deposition only in the county wherein he resides or is employed or transacts his business in person. A nonresident of the State may be required to attend for such examination only in the county wherein he resides or within 50 miles of the place of service except that a judge, as defined by subdivision (h) of this rule, may, upon motion showing good cause, require that a party who selected the county where the action is pending as the forum for the action or an officer, director or managing agent of such a party, or a person designated pursuant to subsection (b)(6) hereof to testify on behalf of such a party present himself for the taking of his deposition in the county where the action is pending. The judge upon granting the motion may make any other orders allowed by Rule 26(c) with respect thereto, including orders with respect to the expenses of the deponent.

(2) Leave of court is not required for the taking of a deposition by plaintiff if the notice (i) states that the person to be examined is about to go out of the county where the action is pending and more than 100 miles from the place of trial, or is about to go out of the United States, or is bound on a voyage to sea, and will be unavailable for examination unless his deposition is taken before expiration of the 30- day period, and (ii) sets forth facts to support the statement. The plaintiff's attorney shall sign the notice, and his signature constitutes a certification by him that to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief the statement and supporting facts are true. The sanctions provided by Rule 11 are applicable to the certification. If a party shows that when he was served with notice under this subsection (b)(2) he was unable through the exercise of diligence to obtain counsel to represent him at the taking of the deposition, the deposition may not be used against him.

(3) The court may for cause shown enlarge or shorten the time for taking the deposition.

(4) Unless the court orders otherwise, testimony at a deposition may be recorded by sound recording, sound-and-visual, or stenographic means. If the testimony is to be taken by other means in addition to or in lieu of stenographic means, the notice shall state the methods by which it shall be taken and shall state whether a stenographer will be present at the deposition. In the case of a deposition taken by stenographic means, the party that provides for the photographer shall provide for the transcribing of the testimony taken. If the deposition is by sound recording only, the party noticing the deposition shall provide for the transcribing of the testimony taken. If the deposition is by sound-and-visual means, the appearance or demeanor of deponents or attorneys shall not be distorted through camera techniques. Regardless of the method stated in the notice, any party or the deponent may have the testimony recorded by stenographic means.

(5) A party deponent, deponents who are officers, directors or managing agents of parties and other persons designated pursuant to subsection (b)(6) hereof to testify on behalf of a party may not be served with a subpoena duces tecum, but the notice to a party for the deposition of such a deponent may be accompanied by a request made in compliance with Rule 34 for the production of documents and tangible things at the taking of the deposition. The procedure of Rule 34, except as to time for response, shall apply to the request. When a notice to take such a deposition is accompanied by a request made in compliance with Rule 34 the notice and the request must be served at least 15 days earlier than would otherwise be required by Rule 30(b)(1), and any objections to such a request must be served at least seven days prior to the taking of the deposition.

(6) A party may in his notice and in a subpoena name as the deponent a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency and describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested. In that event, the organization so named shall designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or other persons who consent to testify on its behalf, and may set forth, for each person designated, the matters on which he will testify. A subpoena shall advise a nonparty organization of its duty to make such a designation. It shall not be necessary to serve a subpoena on an organization which is a party, but the notice, served on a party without an accompanying subpoena shall clearly advise such of its duty to make the required designation. The persons so designated shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the organization. This subsection (b)(6) does not preclude taking a deposition by any other procedure authorized in these rules.

(7) The parties may stipulate in writing or the court may upon motion order that a deposition be taken by telephone. For the purposes of this rule and Rules 28(a), 37(a)(1) and 45(d), a deposition taken by telephone is taken in the district and the place where the deponent is to answer questions propounded to him. Rule 30(b)

After commencement of the action, any party may take the testimony of any person, including a party, by deposition upon written questions. The attendance of witnesses may be compelled by the use of subpoena as provided in Rule 45 provided that no subpoena need be served on a deponent who is a party or an officer, director or managing agent of a party, provided the party has been served with notice pursuant to this rule. Such a deposition shall be taken in the county where the witness resides or is employed or transacts his business in person unless the witness agrees that it may be taken elsewhere. The deposition of a person confined in prison or of a patient receiving in-patient care in or confined to an institution or hospital for the mentally ill or mentally handicapped may be taken only by leave of court on such terms as the court prescribes.

A party desiring to take a deposition upon written questions shall serve them upon every other party with a notice stating

(i) the name and address of the person who is to answer them, if known, and if the name is not known, a general description sufficient to identify him or the particular class or group to which he belongs, and

(ii) the name or descriptive title and address of the officer before whom the deposition is to be taken. A deposition upon written questions may be taken of a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(b)(6).

Within 30 days after the notice and written questions are served, a party may serve cross questions upon all other parties. Within 10 days after being served with cross questions, a party may serve redirect questions upon all other parties. Within 10 days after being served with redirect questions, a party may serve recross questions upon all other parties. The court may for cause shown enlarge or shorten the time.

Person to take responses and prepare record.

A copy of the notice and copies of all questions served shall be delivered by the party taking the deposition to the person designated in the notice to take the deposition, who shall proceed promptly, in the manner provided by Rule 30(c), (e), and (f), to take the testimony of the deponent in response to the questions and to prepare, certify, and file or mail the deposition, attaching thereto the copy of the notice and the questions received by him.

Notice of filing.

When the deposition is filed the clerk shall promptly give notice thereof to all parties. Rule 31

Interrogatories

Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is available to the party. Interrogatories may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party.

A party may direct no more than 50 interrogatories, in one or more sets, to any other party, except upon leave granted by the Court for good cause shown or by agreement of the other party. Interrogatory parts and subparts shall be counted as separate interrogatories for purposes of this rule.

There shall be sufficient space following each interrogatory in which the respondent may state the response. The respondent shall: (1) state the response in the space provided, using additional pages if necessary; or (2) restate the interrogatory to be followed by the response.

Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. An objection to an interrogatory shall be made by stating the objection and the reason therefor either in the space following the interrogatory or following the restated interrogatory. The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making them. The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the answers, and objections if any, within 30 days after the service of the interrogatories, except that a defendant may serve answers or objections within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant. The court may allow a shorter or longer time. The party submitting the interrogatories may move for an order under Rule 37(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to answer an interrogatory. Rule 33(a)

Production

Any party may serve on any other party a request (i) to produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on his behalf, to inspect and copy, any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent through detection devices into reasonably usable form), or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things which constitute or contain matters within the scope of Rule 26(b) and which are in the possession, custody or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or (ii) to permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the scope of Rule 26(b). Rule 34(a)

The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party. The request shall set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts. The party upon whom the request is served shall serve a written response within 30 days after the service of the request, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. The court may allow a shorter or longer time. The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the part shall be specified. The party submitting the request may move for an order under Rule 37(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to respond to the request or any part thereof, or any failure to permit inspection as requested.

There shall be sufficient space following each request in which the respondent may state the response. The respondent shall: (1) state the response in the space provided, using additional pages if necessary; or (2) restate the request to be followed by the response. An objection to a request shall be made by stating the objection and the reason therefor either in the space following the request or following the restated request. Rule 34(b)

Physical and Mental Examinations of Persons

When the mental or physical condition (including the blood group) of a party, or of an agent or a person in the custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy, a judge of the court in which the action is pending as defined by Rule 30(h) may order the party to submit to a physical or mental examination by a physician or to produce for examination his agent or the person in his custody or legal control. The order may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person to be examined and to all parties and shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made. 35(a)

(1) If requested by the party against whom an order is made under Rule 35(a) or the person examined, the party causing the examination to be made shall deliver to him a copy of a detailed written report of the examining physician setting out his findings, including results of all tests made, diagnoses and conclusions, together with like reports of all earlier examinations of the same condition. After such request and delivery the party causing the examination shall be entitled upon request to receive from the party against whom the order is made a like report of any examination, previously or thereafter made, of the same condition, unless, in the case of a report of examination of a person not a party, the party shows that he is unable to obtain it. The court on motion may make an order against a party requiring delivery of a report on such terms as are just, and if a physician fails or refuses to make a report the court may exclude his testimony if offered at the trial.

(2) By requesting and obtaining a report of the examination so ordered or by taking the deposition of the examiner, the party examined waives any privilege he may have in that action or any other involving the same controversy, regarding the testimony of every other person who has examined or may thereafter examine him in respect of the same mental or physical condition.

(3) This subsection applies to examinations made by agreement of the parties, unless the agreement expressly provides otherwise. This subsection does not preclude discovery of a report of an examining physician or the taking of a deposition of the physician in accordance with the provisions of any other rule. 35(b)

Requests for Admissions

A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon that party. If the request is served with service of the summons and complaint, the summons shall so state.

Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless, within 30 days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party or by his attorney, but, unless the court shortens the time, a defendant shall not be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of 60 days after service of the summons and complaint upon him. If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that a party qualify his answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, he shall specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless he states that he has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by him is insufficient to enable him to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; he may, subject to the provisions of Rule 37(c), deny the matter or set forth reasons why he cannot admit or deny it.There shall be sufficient space following each request in which the respondent may state the response. The respondent shall:

(1) State the response in the space provided, using additional pages if necessary; or

(2) Restate the request to be followed by the response. An objection to a request shall be made by stating the objection and the reason therefor either in the space following the request or following the restated request. The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of this rule, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request be made at a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior to trial. The provisions of Rule 37(a)(4) apply to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion. Rule 36

Compel Discovery

A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling discovery as follows:

(1) Appropriate Court. - An application for an order to a party or a deponent who is not a party may be made to a judge of the court in which the action is pending, or, on matters relating to a deposition where the deposition is being taken in this State, to a judge of the court in the county where the deposition is being taken, as defined by Rule 30(h).

(2) Motion. - If a deponent fails to answer a question propounded or submitted under Rules 30 or 31, or a corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a), or a party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted under Rule 33, or if a party, in response to a request for inspection submitted under Rule 34, fails to respond that inspection will be permitted as requested or fails to permit inspection as requested, the discovering party may move for an order compelling an answer, or a designation, or an order compelling inspection in accordance with the request. When taking a deposition on oral examination, the proponent of the question shall complete the examination on all other matters before he adjourns the examination in order to apply for an order. If the court denies the motion in whole or in part, it may make such protective order as it would have been empowered to make on a motion made pursuant to Rule 26(c).

(3) Evasive or Incomplete Answer. - For purposes of this subdivision an evasive or incomplete answer is to be treated as a failure to answer. Rule 37

Domestic Actions Discovery Notes

If you require extra time to respond to discovery, you should ask the other side for an extension in writing. It may also be necessary to enter an order granting the extension to protect your rights.

Discovery questions are limited in number so select the most important questions to ask the other side. Don't waste your requests writing questions that you already know the answer to.