This is an official form from the North Carolina Court System, which complies with all applicable laws and statutes. USLF amends and updates the forms as is required by North Carolina statutes and law.
A Charlotte North Carolina Juvenile Level 3 Disposition and Commitment Order in Violation of Post Release Supervision refers to a legal document that outlines the consequences for a juvenile offender who has violated the terms of their post-release supervision. This order is specific to the jurisdiction of Charlotte, North Carolina, and applies to cases involving juveniles who have been placed on post-release supervision after completing a period of confinement. In North Carolina, there are different levels of disposition and commitment orders based on the severity of the violation and the risk posed by the juvenile offender. Level 3 is considered the highest level of violation and is accompanied by stricter consequences. Keywords relevant to this type of order and violation include: 1. Juvenile: Refers to a person who is considered a minor under the legal system. 2. Disposition: Indicates the legal decision or action taken by the court regarding the punishment or treatment of the juvenile offender. 3. Commitment: Implies that the juvenile offender must be confined or placed in a correctional facility for a specified period. 4. Order: A legally binding document issued by a court that outlines the terms and conditions that the offender must adhere to. 5. Violation: The act of breaking or failing to comply with the terms and conditions of the post-release supervision. 6. Post Release Supervision: A period of supervision and monitoring that follows a juvenile's release from a confinement facility, during which they are expected to abide by certain rules and conditions. 7. Charlotte: Refers to the specific jurisdiction where the violation occurred, which in this case is Charlotte, North Carolina. Different types of Level 3 Disposition and Commitment Orders in Violation of Post Release Supervision may include variations based on the specific circumstances of each case. However, the specific names of these variations cannot be provided as they would depend on the individual cases and the decisions made by the court.A Charlotte North Carolina Juvenile Level 3 Disposition and Commitment Order in Violation of Post Release Supervision refers to a legal document that outlines the consequences for a juvenile offender who has violated the terms of their post-release supervision. This order is specific to the jurisdiction of Charlotte, North Carolina, and applies to cases involving juveniles who have been placed on post-release supervision after completing a period of confinement. In North Carolina, there are different levels of disposition and commitment orders based on the severity of the violation and the risk posed by the juvenile offender. Level 3 is considered the highest level of violation and is accompanied by stricter consequences. Keywords relevant to this type of order and violation include: 1. Juvenile: Refers to a person who is considered a minor under the legal system. 2. Disposition: Indicates the legal decision or action taken by the court regarding the punishment or treatment of the juvenile offender. 3. Commitment: Implies that the juvenile offender must be confined or placed in a correctional facility for a specified period. 4. Order: A legally binding document issued by a court that outlines the terms and conditions that the offender must adhere to. 5. Violation: The act of breaking or failing to comply with the terms and conditions of the post-release supervision. 6. Post Release Supervision: A period of supervision and monitoring that follows a juvenile's release from a confinement facility, during which they are expected to abide by certain rules and conditions. 7. Charlotte: Refers to the specific jurisdiction where the violation occurred, which in this case is Charlotte, North Carolina. Different types of Level 3 Disposition and Commitment Orders in Violation of Post Release Supervision may include variations based on the specific circumstances of each case. However, the specific names of these variations cannot be provided as they would depend on the individual cases and the decisions made by the court.
