Description: Broken Arrow Oklahoma Interrogatories to Defendant for Motor Vehicle Accident. In the event of a motor vehicle accident in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, the injured party (or plaintiff) often files a lawsuit seeking compensation for damages incurred. As part of this legal process, the plaintiff's attorney may serve Interrogatories to the defendant, which are written questions that require them to provide detailed information related to the accident and their involvement. These interrogatories play a crucial role in building a strong case and obtaining crucial evidence. Keywords: 1. Broken Arrow, Oklahoma: Refers to the specific location where the accident took place, and establishes the jurisdiction where the lawsuit is being filed. 2. Interrogatories to Defendants: A formal set of written questions served by the plaintiff's attorney to the defendant that require them to provide detailed information related to the accident and their involvement. 3. Motor Vehicle Accident: Indicates that the accident involved automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, or any other form of transportation on the road. 4. Lawsuit: The legal action taken by the injured party to seek compensation for damages incurred due to the motor vehicle accident. 5. Compensation: Refers to the financial reimbursement that the injured party seeks for medical bills, property damage, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other related damages. 6. Plaintiff: The individual or party who initiates the lawsuit, in this case, the injured party seeking compensation. 7. Defendant: The individual or party against whom the lawsuit is filed, typically the responsible party for the accident. 8. Evidence: The information, documents, and testimonies obtained during the legal process that are used to support the plaintiff's case and prove liability. 9. Attorney: The legal professional representing the plaintiff and responsible for drafting and serving the interrogatories to the defendant. 10. Jurisdiction: The specific geographic area or court that has authority over the legal matter being pursued. Types of Broken Arrow Oklahoma Interrogatories to Defendant for Motor Vehicle Accident: 1. Liability Interrogatories: These interrogatories aim to determine and establish the defendant's liability for the accident. They may include questions about the defendant's driving behavior, adherence to traffic laws, involvement of any third parties, and any potential negligence on their part. 2. Damages Interrogatories: These interrogatories focus on the damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the accident. They may inquire about medical treatments, expenses, lost wages, emotional distress, and any other losses experienced by the plaintiff. 3. Witness and Expert Interrogatories: These interrogatories seek to obtain information about witnesses and any expert opinions the defendant may rely on. They may request the defendant to identify and provide contact information for witnesses and disclose any expert reports or opinions they intend to present during the trial. 4. Insurance Interrogatories: These interrogatories center around the defendant's insurance coverage. They may inquire about the defendant's insurance policy limits, any other insurance policies that may be applicable, and any settlements or claims made pertaining to the accident. 5. Accident Reconstruction Interrogatories: In complex cases, these interrogatories target the defendant's understanding of the accident sequence and their perspective on how it occurred. They may ask the defendant to provide a detailed description of events leading up to the accident, their actions before, during, and after the collision, and any contributing factors or external circumstances they believe played a role. Please note that the specific types and content of interrogatories may vary depending on the circumstances of the motor vehicle accident and the strategies employed by the plaintiff's attorney.
- US Legal Forms
- Localized Forms
- Oklahoma
- Broken Arrow
-
Oklahoma Interrogatories to Defendant for Motor Vehicle Accident
Broken Arrow Oklahoma Interrogatories to Defendant for Motor Vehicle Accident
Description
How to fill out Broken Arrow Oklahoma Interrogatories To Defendant For Motor Vehicle Accident?
If you’ve already utilized our service before, log in to your account and download the Broken Arrow Oklahoma Interrogatories to Defendant for Motor Vehicle Accident on your device by clicking the Download button. Make sure your subscription is valid. If not, renew it in accordance with your payment plan.
If this is your first experience with our service, adhere to these simple actions to obtain your file:
- Ensure you’ve located the right document. Read the description and use the Preview option, if any, to check if it meets your requirements. If it doesn’t fit you, use the Search tab above to obtain the proper one.
- Purchase the template. Click the Buy Now button and choose a monthly or annual subscription plan.
- Create an account and make a payment. Use your credit card details or the PayPal option to complete the transaction.
- Get your Broken Arrow Oklahoma Interrogatories to Defendant for Motor Vehicle Accident. Choose the file format for your document and save it to your device.
- Complete your sample. Print it out or take advantage of professional online editors to fill it out and sign it electronically.
You have permanent access to each piece of paperwork you have purchased: you can locate it in your profile within the My Forms menu whenever you need to reuse it again. Take advantage of the US Legal Forms service to rapidly locate and save any template for your personal or professional needs!
Form Rating
Form popularity
FAQ
Some other examples of questions you might receive in an Examination for Discovery include but are not limited to the following types of inquiries: How did the auto accident happen? Were you driving the vehicle at the time of the crash? Were you engaged in any distracting behaviors when the collision occurred?
Interrogatories are lists of questions sent to the other party that s/he must respond to in writing. You can use interrogatories to find out facts about a case but they cannot be used for questions that draw a legal conclusion.
The answers given in interrogatories can be used in court during a trial. The information from the interrogatories saves time in a trial because the basic facts have already been established and do not need to be repeated through questions of the witnesses in court.
(c) Scope; Use at Trial. Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired into under Rule 26(b)(1), and the answers may be used to the extent permitted by the rules of evidence.
Your answers to the interrogatories should usually be short, clear, and direct and should answer only the question that is being asked. This is not the time to set out your entire case or defense to the other side. Take the time to make sure your answers are correct and truthful.
You are limited to 30 interrogatories per party in the case, unless a written stipulation is reached or the court authorizes. There is a statutory procedure for requesting additional interrogatories, and this procedure must be followed before the additional requests are made.
If the other side does not think that your objection is valid, s/he may be able to file a motion to compel, which basically asks the judge to force you to answer the interrogatories. The judge will then decide whether the question in the interrogatories must be answered or not.
Interrogatories can only be sent to the opposing party ? they cannot be sent to experts or other witnesses. The disadvantage of interrogatories is that the answers are typically prepared by the attorney rather than by the client.
Your answers to the interrogatories should usually be short, clear, and direct and should answer only the question that is being asked. This is not the time to set out your entire case or defense to the other side. Take the time to make sure your answers are correct and truthful.
Broken Arrow Oklahoma Interrogatories to Defendant for Motor Vehicle Accident Related Searches
-
small claims court oklahoma rules
-
oklahoma small claims court statute of limitations
-
small claims court oklahoma cost
-
small claims court oklahoma forms
-
oklahoma small claims affidavit
-
how to file a civil lawsuit in oklahoma
-
how to sue someone in small claims court in oklahoma
-
small claims court lawton ok
-
sample interrogatories negligence to defendant
-
sample interrogatories to defendant personal injury
Interesting Questions
A Broken Arrow Interrogatory is a set of written questions that the plaintiff's attorney sends to the defendant in a motor vehicle accident case, with the aim of obtaining relevant information about the incident and the defendant's involvement.
Broken Arrow Interrogatories are important as they help gather facts about the accident from the defendant's perspective, allowing the plaintiff's attorney to build a stronger case by uncovering critical details.
Broken Arrow Interrogatories are delivered in written form, typically through mail or electronic means, to the defendant or their attorney. They must be answered truthfully and within a specific time frame.
Broken Arrow Interrogatories may ask for details about the defendant's version of events, their insurance coverage, prior convictions, vehicle maintenance records, and any witnesses they may have.
A defendant can refuse to answer Broken Arrow Interrogatories only if the questions are improperly crafted or protected by a valid objection, such as attorney-client privilege or information that is not yet known.
If a defendant fails to answer Broken Arrow Interrogatories within the given time frame or refuses to answer without proper justification, the plaintiff's attorney may seek court intervention and ask for sanctions against the defendant.
More info
This year's presentations can be found in the video section. Brennan C., Law and Policy Program, University of Maryland. In this video demonstration of the basics of a lawsuit, Brennan C. addresses some unique challenges in a CIV, with a focus on questions of personal jurisdiction. He discusses how to determine the proper place for a hearing in a CIV case, explains how the purpose of arbitration is determined, and describes potential hurdles faced in a trial. A case like this, involving a young engineer who worked hard and has suffered severe injury, is one that would benefit from a CIV hearing, but it needs careful review. C. Tuck, Law School, University of Pennsylvania. Presentation on a case that received a favorable appellate court decision where the jury awarded damages in an arbitration agreement. An arbitration agreement is not the usual way to address a dispute, for reasons I'll describe in my discussion of CIV.
Disclaimer
The materials in this section are taken from public sources. We disclaim all representations or any warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, authenticity, reliability, accessibility, adequacy, or completeness of any data in this paragraph. Nevertheless, we make every effort to cite public sources deemed reliable and trustworthy.
Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies
-
No results found.
-
Oklahoma
-
Alabama
-
Alaska
-
Arizona
-
Arkansas
-
California
-
Connecticut
-
Delaware
-
District of Columbia
-
Florida
-
Georgia
-
Hawaii
-
Idaho
-
Illinois
-
Indiana
-
Iowa
-
Kentucky
-
Louisiana
-
Maine
-
Maryland
-
Massachusetts
-
Michigan
-
Minnesota
-
Mississippi
-
Missouri
-
Montana
-
Nebraska
-
Nevada
-
New Hampshire
-
New Jersey
-
New Mexico
-
New York
-
North Carolina
-
North Dakota
-
Ohio
-
Oregon
-
Pennsylvania
-
Rhode Island
-
South Carolina
-
South Dakota
-
Tennessee
-
Texas
-
Utah
-
Vermont
-
Virginia
-
Washington
-
West Virginia
-
Wisconsin
-
Wyoming
Note: This summary is not intended to be an all inclusive summary of discovery law in Oklahoma, but does include basic and other information.
Definitions
Discovery:
A procedure designed to allow disclosure of information between Plaintiffs and Defendants. Written questions, oral questioning, document production and admissions requests are generally allowed. Discovery was designed to to prevent trial by ambush.
Interrogatories:
Written questions from Plaintiff to Defendant, or from Defendant to Plaintiff. The questions are mailed to the Plaintiff, Defendant or the attorney for response in writing. The answers or responses are usually due between 20-30 days.
Deposition:
A procedure where verbal questions are asked a Plaintiff or Defendant for immediate response. Depositions are usually recorded by a court reporter, who swears the person to tell the truth before questioning begins.
Production of Documents:
The method of obtaining documents from the other party relevant to the case such as all documents a party intends to introduce at trial.
Requests for Admissions:
Written questions where you request the other party to admit or deny some relevant fact.
Objections:
Objections may be made to all discovery questions if the questions are not relevant, or likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.
Civil Procedure Rules:
Virtually all states have adopted a version of civil procedure rules which include rules dealing with discovery.
Oklahoma Rules of Civil Procedure
The Oklahoma Rules of Civil Procedure are contained in the Oklahoma State Statutes, Title 12. The discovery rules are specifically found in Section 12-3226 through Section 12-3237.
Discovery Methods:
Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: Depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property, for inspection and other purposes; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission. Unless the court orders otherwise under this section, the frequency of use of these methods is not limited.
Section 12-3226(A)
Scope:
Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition and location of any books, documents or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. It is not a ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Section 12-3226(B)(1)
Experts:
a. Discovery of facts known and opinions held
by experts, otherwise discoverable under the provisions of paragraph 1
of this subsection and acquired or developed in anticipation of litigation
or for trial, may be obtained only as follows:
(1) A party may, through interrogatories, require any other party
to identify each person whom that other party expects to call
as an expert witness at trial and give the address at which that
expert witness may be located.
(2) After disclosure of the names and addresses of the expert witnesses,
the other party expects to call as witnesses, the party, who has requested
disclosure, may depose any such expert witnesses subject to the scope of this
section. Prior to taking the deposition the party must give notice as required
in subsections A and C of Section 3230 of this title.
(3) In addition to taking the deposition of an expert witness the party
may, through interrogatories, require the party who expects to call the
expert witness to state the subject matter on which the expert is expected
to testify, and to state the substance of the facts and opinions to which
the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each
opinion.
b. A party may discover facts known or opinions held by an expert
who has been retained or specially employed by another party in anticipation
of litigation or preparation for trial and who is not expected
to be called as a witness at trial, only upon motion, when the
court may order discovery as provided in Section 3235 of this title
or upon a showing of exceptional circumstances under which it is impracticable
for the party seeking discovery to obtain facts or opinions on
the same subject by any other means.
c. Unless manifest injustice would result:
(1) The court shall require that the party seeking discovery pay
the expert a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery under
division (2) of subparagraph a of this paragraph and subparagraph b of
this paragraph.
(2) The court shall require that the party seeking discovery with respect
to discovery obtained under subparagraph b of this paragraph, pay the other
party a fair portion of the fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the
latter party in obtaining facts and opinions from the expert. Section 12-3226(B)(3)
Sequence and Timing of Discovery:
Unless the court upon motion, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice, orders otherwise, methods of discovery may be used in any sequence. The fact that a party is conducting discovery, whether by deposition or otherwise, shall not operate to delay discovery by any other party. Section 12-3226(D)
Supplementation of Responses:
A party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when it was made is under no duty to supplement the response to include information thereafter acquired, except as follows:
1. A party is under a duty seasonably to supplement the response
with respect to any question directly addressed to:
a. the identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable
matters, and
b. the identity of each person expected to be called as an expert
witness at trial, the subject matter on which he is expected to testify,
and the substance of his testimony.
2. A party is under a duty seasonably to amend a prior response
to an interrogatory, request for production, or request for admission if
the party obtains information upon the basis of which:
a. (i) the party knows that the response was incorrect in some material
respect when made, or
(ii) the party knows that the response, which was correct when made,
is no longer true in some material respect; and
b. the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made
known to the other parties during the discovery process or in writing.
3. A duty to supplement responses may be imposed by order of the court,
agreement of the parties, or at any time prior to trial through new requests
for supplementation of prior responses. Section 12-3226(E)
Discovery Conference:
At any time after commencement of an action, the court may direct the attorneys for the parties to appear for a conference on the subject of discovery. The court shall do so upon motion by the attorney for any party if the motion includes:
1. A statement of the issues as they then appear;
2. A proposed plan and schedule of discovery;
3. Any limitations proposed to be placed on discovery;
4. Any other proposed orders with respect to discovery; and
5. A statement showing that the attorney making the motion has made
a reasonable effort to reach agreement with opposing attorneys on the matters
set forth in the motion.
Each party and his attorney are under a duty to participate in good faith in the framing of a discovery plan if a plan is proposed by the attorney for any party. Notice of the motion shall be served on all parties. Objections or additions to matters set forth in the motion shall be served not later than ten (10) days after service of the motion.
Following the discovery conference, the court shall enter an order tentatively identifying the issues for discovery purposes, establishing a plan and schedule for discovery, setting limitations on discovery, if any; and determining such other matters, including the allocation of expenses, as are necessary for the proper management of discovery in the action. In preparing the plan for discovery the court shall protect the parties from excessive or abusive use of discovery. An order shall be altered or amended whenever justice so requires.
Subject to the right of a party who properly moves for a discovery conference to prompt convening of the conference, the court may combine the discovery conference with a pretrial conference.
Section 12-3226(F)
Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken:
Within this state, depositions shall be taken before an officer authorized to administer oaths by the laws of the place where the examination is held, or before a person appointed by the court in which the action is pending. A person so appointed has power to administer oaths and take testimony.
Depositions may be taken outside of Oklahoma:
On notice before a person authorized to administer oaths in the place in which the examination is held, either by the law thereof or by the law of this state; or
Before a person commissioned by the court, and a person so commissioned shall have the power by virtue of his commission to administer any necessary oath and take testimony; or
A commission or a letter rogatory shall be issued on application and notice and on terms that are just and appropriate. It is not requisite to the issuance of a commission or a letter rogatory that the taking of the deposition in any other manner is impracticable or inconvenient; and both a commission and a letter rogatory may be issued in proper cases. A notice or commission may designate the person before whom the deposition is to be taken either by name or descriptive title. Evidence obtained in response to a letter rogatory need not be excluded merely for the reason that it is not a verbatim transcript or that the testimony was not taken under oath or for any similar departure from the requirements for depositions taken within this state. Section 12-3228
Depositions
Stipulations:
Unless the court orders otherwise, the parties may by written stipulation:
1. Provide that depositions may be taken before any person, at any
time or place, upon any notice, and in any manner and when so taken
may be used like other depositions; and
2. Modify other procedures governing or limitations placed upon
discovery, except that stipulations extending the time provided in Sections
3226, 3233, 3234 and 3236 of this title for responses to discovery may,
if they would interfere with any time set for completion of discovery,
be made only with the approval of the court. A person designated by the
stipulation has the power by virtue of his designation to administer any
necessary oath. Section 12-3229
Interrogatories
A. Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories
to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public
or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental
agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as
is available to that party. Interrogatories may, without leave of court,
be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action or upon any
other party with the summons and petition or after service of the summons
and petition on that party.
Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing
under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the objecting
party shall state the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent
the interrogatory is not objectionable. The number of interrogatories to
a party shall not exceed thirty in number. Interrogatories inquiring as
to the names and locations of witnesses, or the existence, location and
custodian of documents or physical evidence shall be construed as one interrogatory.
All other interrogatories, including subdivisions of one numbered interrogatory,
shall be construed as separate interrogatories. No further interrogatories
will be served unless authorized by the court. If counsel for a party believes
that more than thirty interrogatories are necessary, he shall consult with
opposing counsel promptly and attempt to reach a written stipulation as
to a reasonable number of additional interrogatories. Counsel are expected
to comply with this requirement in good faith. In the event a written stipulation
cannot be agreed upon, the party seeking to submit such additional interrogatories
shall file a motion with the court (1) showing that counsel have conferred
in good faith but sincere attempts to resolve the issue have been unavailing,
(2) showing reasons establishing good cause for their use, and (3) setting
forth the proposed additional interrogatories. The answers are to be signed
by the person making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making
them. The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve
a copy of the answers and objections if any, within thirty (30) days after
the service of the interrogatories, except that a defendant may serve answers
or objections to interrogatories within forty-five (45) days after service
of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. A shorter or longer time
may be directed by the court or, in the absence of such an order, agreed
to in writing by the parties subject to Section 3229 of this title. All
grounds for an objection to an interrogatory shall be stated with specificity.
Any ground not stated in a timely objection is waived unless the party's
failure to object is excused by the court for good cause shown. The party
submitting the interrogatories may move for an order under subsection A
of Section 3237 of this title with respect to any objection to or other
failure to answer an interrogatory.
B. Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired
into under subsection B of Section 3226 of this title, and the answers
may be used to the extent permitted by the Oklahoma Evidence Code as set
forth in Sections 2101 et seq. of this title.
An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable
because an answer to the interrogatory involves an opinion or contention
that relates to fact or the application of law to fact. The court may order
that such an interrogatory need not be answered until after designated
discovery has been completed or until a pretrial conference or other later
time. Section 12-3233
Production
Any party may serve on any other party a request:
1. To produce and permit the party making the request, or someone
acting on his behalf, to inspect and copy any designated documents including,
but not limited to, writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, motion
picture films, phonograph records, tape and video recordings,
records and other data compilations from which information can
be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent through detection
devices into a reasonably usable form, or to inspect and copy, test
or sample any tangible things which constitute or contain matters within
the scope of subsection B of Section 3226 of this title and which are in
the possession, custody or control of the party upon whom the request is
served; or
2. To permit entry upon designated land or other property in the
possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for
the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing
or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon,
within the scope of subsection B of Section 3226 of this title.
Section 12-234
Physical and Mental Examinations of Persons
When the physical, including the blood group, or mental condition of a party or of a person in custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy in any proceeding in which the person relies upon that condition as an element of his claim or defense, an adverse party may take a physical or mental examination of such person.
The party desiring to take the physical or mental examination of another party or of a person in custody or control of another party within the scope of subsection A of this section shall serve his request upon the person to be examined and all other parties. The request shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made.
No request shall be served until thirty (30) days after service of summons and petition upon the defendant. The request shall set a time for the examination not less than five (5) days after service of the notice.
If the party or person in custody or control of the party who is to be examined objects to the physical or mental examination then he shall file a motion objecting to the examination and setting out the reasons why his mental or physical condition is not in controversy or such person may apply for a protective order under the provisions of subsection C of Section 3226 of this title. The burden of proof is upon the person objecting to the examination or requesting a protective order. The court may set the conditions for examination or refuse to permit such examination if the mental or physical condition is not in controversy. If the party or the person in custody or control of the party refuses to obey the court order to submit to a physical or mental examination the court may impose those sanctions provided for in paragraph 4 of subsection A and paragraph 2 of subsection B of Section 3237 of this title.
If the motion is granted to prohibit the examination, the court may impose those sanctions provided for in paragraph 4 of subsection A of Section 3237 of this title upon the party requesting the examination.
When the physical, including the blood group, or mental condition of a party, or a person in the custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy but does not meet the conditions set forth in subsection A of this section, the court in which the action is pending may order the party to submit to a physical or mental examination by a suitably licensed or certified examiner or to produce for such examination the agent, employee or person in his custody or legal control. The order may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person to be examined and to all parties. The order shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made.
A representative of the person to be examined may be present at the examination.
If requested by the party or the person examined under this section, the party causing the examination to be made shall deliver to him a copy of a detailed written report of the examiner setting out his findings, including results of all tests made, diagnoses and conclusions, together with the like reports of all earlier examinations of the same condition. After delivery, the party causing the examination shall be entitled upon request to receive from the party or person against whom the order is made a like report of any examination, previously or thereafter made, of the same condition, unless, in the case of a report of examination of a person not a party, the party shows that he is unable to obtain it. The court on motion may enter an order against a party requiring delivery of a report on such terms as are just. If an examiner fails or refuses to make a report the court may exclude his testimony if offered at the trial.
If the physician or psychotherapist-patient privilege has not already been waived as provided in the Oklahoma Evidence Code requesting and obtaining a report of the examination made or by taking the deposition of the examiner, the party examined waives any privilege he may have in that action or any other involving the same controversy, regarding the testimony of every other person who has examined or may thereafter examine him in respect of the same physical or mental condition.
This subsection applies to examinations made by agreement of the parties, unless the agreement expressly provides otherwise. This subsection does not preclude discovery of a report of an examiner or the taking of a deposition of the examiner in accordance with the provisions of any other section of the Oklahoma Discovery Code.
Section 12-3235
Requests for Admissions
A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Section 3226 of this title set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request for admission unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with the summons and petition or after service of the summons and petition upon that party. The number of requests for admissions for each party is limited to thirty. No further requests for admission will be served unless authorized by the court. If counsel for a party believes that more than thirty requests for admissions are necessary, he shall consult with opposing counsel promptly and attempt to reach a written stipulation as to a reasonable number of additional requests for admissions. Counsel are expected to comply with this requirement in good faith. In the event a written stipulation cannot be agreed upon, the party seeking to submit such additional requests for admissions shall file a motion with the court (1) showing that counsel have conferred in good faith but sincere attempts to resolve the issue have been unavailing, (2) showing reasons establishing good cause for their use, and (3) setting forth the proposed additional requests. Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless, within thirty (30) days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party or by his attorney, but unless the court shortens the time, a defendant shall not be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of forty-five (45) days after service of the summons and petition upon him.
If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that a party qualify his answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, he shall specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless he states that he has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by him is insufficient to enable him to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; he may, subject to the provisions of subsection D of Section 3237 of this title, deny the matter or set forth reasons why he cannot admit or deny it.
The party who has requested the admission may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of this section, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served.
The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request be made at a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior to trial. The provisions of paragraph 4 of subsection A of Section 3237 of this title apply to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion. Section 12-3236
Compel Discovery
A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling discovery as follows:
An application for an order to a party may be made to the court in which the action is pending, or, on matters, relating to a deposition, to the district court in the county where the deposition is being taken. An application for an order to a deponent who is not a party shall be made to the district court in the county where the deposition is being taken or to the court in which the action is pending.
If a deponent fails to answer a question propounded or submitted under Section 3230 or 3231 of this title, or a corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under paragraph 6 of subsection C of Section 3230 or subsection A of Section 3231 of this title, or a party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted under Section 3233 of this title, or if a party, in response to a request for inspection submitted under Section 3234 of this title, fails to respond that the inspection will be permitted as requested or fails to permit the inspection as requested, the discovering party may move for an order compelling an answer, or a designation, or an order compelling inspection in accordance with the request. The motion must include a statement that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer either in person or by telephone with the person or party failing to make the discovery in an effort to secure the information or material without court action. When taking a deposition on oral examination, the proponent of the question may complete or adjourn the examination before he applies for an order.
If the court denies the motion in whole or in part, it may make such protective order as it would have been empowered to make on a motion made pursuant to subsection C of Section 3226 of this title.
For purposes of this subsection, an evasive or incomplete answer is to be treated as a failure to answer. Section 12-3237
Domestic Actions Discovery Notes
If you require extra time to respond to discovery, you should ask the other side for an extension in writing. It may also be necessary to enter an order granting the extension to protect your rights.
Discovery questions are limited in number so select the most important questions to ask the other side. Don't waste your requests writing questions that you already know the answer to.
Note: This summary is not intended to be an all inclusive summary of discovery law in Oklahoma, but does include basic and other information.
Definitions
Discovery:
A procedure designed to allow disclosure of information between Plaintiffs and Defendants. Written questions, oral questioning, document production and admissions requests are generally allowed. Discovery was designed to to prevent trial by ambush.
Interrogatories:
Written questions from Plaintiff to Defendant, or from Defendant to Plaintiff. The questions are mailed to the Plaintiff, Defendant or the attorney for response in writing. The answers or responses are usually due between 20-30 days.
Deposition:
A procedure where verbal questions are asked a Plaintiff or Defendant for immediate response. Depositions are usually recorded by a court reporter, who swears the person to tell the truth before questioning begins.
Production of Documents:
The method of obtaining documents from the other party relevant to the case such as all documents a party intends to introduce at trial.
Requests for Admissions:
Written questions where you request the other party to admit or deny some relevant fact.
Objections:
Objections may be made to all discovery questions if the questions are not relevant, or likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.
Civil Procedure Rules:
Virtually all states have adopted a version of civil procedure rules which include rules dealing with discovery.
Oklahoma Rules of Civil Procedure
The Oklahoma Rules of Civil Procedure are contained in the Oklahoma State Statutes, Title 12. The discovery rules are specifically found in Section 12-3226 through Section 12-3237.
Discovery Methods:
Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: Depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property, for inspection and other purposes; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission. Unless the court orders otherwise under this section, the frequency of use of these methods is not limited.
Section 12-3226(A)
Scope:
Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition and location of any books, documents or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. It is not a ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Section 12-3226(B)(1)
Experts:
a. Discovery of facts known and opinions held
by experts, otherwise discoverable under the provisions of paragraph 1
of this subsection and acquired or developed in anticipation of litigation
or for trial, may be obtained only as follows:
(1) A party may, through interrogatories, require any other party
to identify each person whom that other party expects to call
as an expert witness at trial and give the address at which that
expert witness may be located.
(2) After disclosure of the names and addresses of the expert witnesses,
the other party expects to call as witnesses, the party, who has requested
disclosure, may depose any such expert witnesses subject to the scope of this
section. Prior to taking the deposition the party must give notice as required
in subsections A and C of Section 3230 of this title.
(3) In addition to taking the deposition of an expert witness the party
may, through interrogatories, require the party who expects to call the
expert witness to state the subject matter on which the expert is expected
to testify, and to state the substance of the facts and opinions to which
the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each
opinion.
b. A party may discover facts known or opinions held by an expert
who has been retained or specially employed by another party in anticipation
of litigation or preparation for trial and who is not expected
to be called as a witness at trial, only upon motion, when the
court may order discovery as provided in Section 3235 of this title
or upon a showing of exceptional circumstances under which it is impracticable
for the party seeking discovery to obtain facts or opinions on
the same subject by any other means.
c. Unless manifest injustice would result:
(1) The court shall require that the party seeking discovery pay
the expert a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery under
division (2) of subparagraph a of this paragraph and subparagraph b of
this paragraph.
(2) The court shall require that the party seeking discovery with respect
to discovery obtained under subparagraph b of this paragraph, pay the other
party a fair portion of the fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the
latter party in obtaining facts and opinions from the expert. Section 12-3226(B)(3)
Sequence and Timing of Discovery:
Unless the court upon motion, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice, orders otherwise, methods of discovery may be used in any sequence. The fact that a party is conducting discovery, whether by deposition or otherwise, shall not operate to delay discovery by any other party. Section 12-3226(D)
Supplementation of Responses:
A party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when it was made is under no duty to supplement the response to include information thereafter acquired, except as follows:
1. A party is under a duty seasonably to supplement the response
with respect to any question directly addressed to:
a. the identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable
matters, and
b. the identity of each person expected to be called as an expert
witness at trial, the subject matter on which he is expected to testify,
and the substance of his testimony.
2. A party is under a duty seasonably to amend a prior response
to an interrogatory, request for production, or request for admission if
the party obtains information upon the basis of which:
a. (i) the party knows that the response was incorrect in some material
respect when made, or
(ii) the party knows that the response, which was correct when made,
is no longer true in some material respect; and
b. the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made
known to the other parties during the discovery process or in writing.
3. A duty to supplement responses may be imposed by order of the court,
agreement of the parties, or at any time prior to trial through new requests
for supplementation of prior responses. Section 12-3226(E)
Discovery Conference:
At any time after commencement of an action, the court may direct the attorneys for the parties to appear for a conference on the subject of discovery. The court shall do so upon motion by the attorney for any party if the motion includes:
1. A statement of the issues as they then appear;
2. A proposed plan and schedule of discovery;
3. Any limitations proposed to be placed on discovery;
4. Any other proposed orders with respect to discovery; and
5. A statement showing that the attorney making the motion has made
a reasonable effort to reach agreement with opposing attorneys on the matters
set forth in the motion.
Each party and his attorney are under a duty to participate in good faith in the framing of a discovery plan if a plan is proposed by the attorney for any party. Notice of the motion shall be served on all parties. Objections or additions to matters set forth in the motion shall be served not later than ten (10) days after service of the motion.
Following the discovery conference, the court shall enter an order tentatively identifying the issues for discovery purposes, establishing a plan and schedule for discovery, setting limitations on discovery, if any; and determining such other matters, including the allocation of expenses, as are necessary for the proper management of discovery in the action. In preparing the plan for discovery the court shall protect the parties from excessive or abusive use of discovery. An order shall be altered or amended whenever justice so requires.
Subject to the right of a party who properly moves for a discovery conference to prompt convening of the conference, the court may combine the discovery conference with a pretrial conference.
Section 12-3226(F)
Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken:
Within this state, depositions shall be taken before an officer authorized to administer oaths by the laws of the place where the examination is held, or before a person appointed by the court in which the action is pending. A person so appointed has power to administer oaths and take testimony.
Depositions may be taken outside of Oklahoma:
On notice before a person authorized to administer oaths in the place in which the examination is held, either by the law thereof or by the law of this state; or
Before a person commissioned by the court, and a person so commissioned shall have the power by virtue of his commission to administer any necessary oath and take testimony; or
A commission or a letter rogatory shall be issued on application and notice and on terms that are just and appropriate. It is not requisite to the issuance of a commission or a letter rogatory that the taking of the deposition in any other manner is impracticable or inconvenient; and both a commission and a letter rogatory may be issued in proper cases. A notice or commission may designate the person before whom the deposition is to be taken either by name or descriptive title. Evidence obtained in response to a letter rogatory need not be excluded merely for the reason that it is not a verbatim transcript or that the testimony was not taken under oath or for any similar departure from the requirements for depositions taken within this state. Section 12-3228
Depositions
Stipulations:
Unless the court orders otherwise, the parties may by written stipulation:
1. Provide that depositions may be taken before any person, at any
time or place, upon any notice, and in any manner and when so taken
may be used like other depositions; and
2. Modify other procedures governing or limitations placed upon
discovery, except that stipulations extending the time provided in Sections
3226, 3233, 3234 and 3236 of this title for responses to discovery may,
if they would interfere with any time set for completion of discovery,
be made only with the approval of the court. A person designated by the
stipulation has the power by virtue of his designation to administer any
necessary oath. Section 12-3229
Interrogatories
A. Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories
to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a public
or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental
agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as
is available to that party. Interrogatories may, without leave of court,
be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action or upon any
other party with the summons and petition or after service of the summons
and petition on that party.
Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing
under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the objecting
party shall state the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent
the interrogatory is not objectionable. The number of interrogatories to
a party shall not exceed thirty in number. Interrogatories inquiring as
to the names and locations of witnesses, or the existence, location and
custodian of documents or physical evidence shall be construed as one interrogatory.
All other interrogatories, including subdivisions of one numbered interrogatory,
shall be construed as separate interrogatories. No further interrogatories
will be served unless authorized by the court. If counsel for a party believes
that more than thirty interrogatories are necessary, he shall consult with
opposing counsel promptly and attempt to reach a written stipulation as
to a reasonable number of additional interrogatories. Counsel are expected
to comply with this requirement in good faith. In the event a written stipulation
cannot be agreed upon, the party seeking to submit such additional interrogatories
shall file a motion with the court (1) showing that counsel have conferred
in good faith but sincere attempts to resolve the issue have been unavailing,
(2) showing reasons establishing good cause for their use, and (3) setting
forth the proposed additional interrogatories. The answers are to be signed
by the person making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making
them. The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve
a copy of the answers and objections if any, within thirty (30) days after
the service of the interrogatories, except that a defendant may serve answers
or objections to interrogatories within forty-five (45) days after service
of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. A shorter or longer time
may be directed by the court or, in the absence of such an order, agreed
to in writing by the parties subject to Section 3229 of this title. All
grounds for an objection to an interrogatory shall be stated with specificity.
Any ground not stated in a timely objection is waived unless the party's
failure to object is excused by the court for good cause shown. The party
submitting the interrogatories may move for an order under subsection A
of Section 3237 of this title with respect to any objection to or other
failure to answer an interrogatory.
B. Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired
into under subsection B of Section 3226 of this title, and the answers
may be used to the extent permitted by the Oklahoma Evidence Code as set
forth in Sections 2101 et seq. of this title.
An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable
because an answer to the interrogatory involves an opinion or contention
that relates to fact or the application of law to fact. The court may order
that such an interrogatory need not be answered until after designated
discovery has been completed or until a pretrial conference or other later
time. Section 12-3233
Production
Any party may serve on any other party a request:
1. To produce and permit the party making the request, or someone
acting on his behalf, to inspect and copy any designated documents including,
but not limited to, writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, motion
picture films, phonograph records, tape and video recordings,
records and other data compilations from which information can
be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent through detection
devices into a reasonably usable form, or to inspect and copy, test
or sample any tangible things which constitute or contain matters within
the scope of subsection B of Section 3226 of this title and which are in
the possession, custody or control of the party upon whom the request is
served; or
2. To permit entry upon designated land or other property in the
possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for
the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing
or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon,
within the scope of subsection B of Section 3226 of this title.
Section 12-234
Physical and Mental Examinations of Persons
When the physical, including the blood group, or mental condition of a party or of a person in custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy in any proceeding in which the person relies upon that condition as an element of his claim or defense, an adverse party may take a physical or mental examination of such person.
The party desiring to take the physical or mental examination of another party or of a person in custody or control of another party within the scope of subsection A of this section shall serve his request upon the person to be examined and all other parties. The request shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made.
No request shall be served until thirty (30) days after service of summons and petition upon the defendant. The request shall set a time for the examination not less than five (5) days after service of the notice.
If the party or person in custody or control of the party who is to be examined objects to the physical or mental examination then he shall file a motion objecting to the examination and setting out the reasons why his mental or physical condition is not in controversy or such person may apply for a protective order under the provisions of subsection C of Section 3226 of this title. The burden of proof is upon the person objecting to the examination or requesting a protective order. The court may set the conditions for examination or refuse to permit such examination if the mental or physical condition is not in controversy. If the party or the person in custody or control of the party refuses to obey the court order to submit to a physical or mental examination the court may impose those sanctions provided for in paragraph 4 of subsection A and paragraph 2 of subsection B of Section 3237 of this title.
If the motion is granted to prohibit the examination, the court may impose those sanctions provided for in paragraph 4 of subsection A of Section 3237 of this title upon the party requesting the examination.
When the physical, including the blood group, or mental condition of a party, or a person in the custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy but does not meet the conditions set forth in subsection A of this section, the court in which the action is pending may order the party to submit to a physical or mental examination by a suitably licensed or certified examiner or to produce for such examination the agent, employee or person in his custody or legal control. The order may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person to be examined and to all parties. The order shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made.
A representative of the person to be examined may be present at the examination.
If requested by the party or the person examined under this section, the party causing the examination to be made shall deliver to him a copy of a detailed written report of the examiner setting out his findings, including results of all tests made, diagnoses and conclusions, together with the like reports of all earlier examinations of the same condition. After delivery, the party causing the examination shall be entitled upon request to receive from the party or person against whom the order is made a like report of any examination, previously or thereafter made, of the same condition, unless, in the case of a report of examination of a person not a party, the party shows that he is unable to obtain it. The court on motion may enter an order against a party requiring delivery of a report on such terms as are just. If an examiner fails or refuses to make a report the court may exclude his testimony if offered at the trial.
If the physician or psychotherapist-patient privilege has not already been waived as provided in the Oklahoma Evidence Code requesting and obtaining a report of the examination made or by taking the deposition of the examiner, the party examined waives any privilege he may have in that action or any other involving the same controversy, regarding the testimony of every other person who has examined or may thereafter examine him in respect of the same physical or mental condition.
This subsection applies to examinations made by agreement of the parties, unless the agreement expressly provides otherwise. This subsection does not preclude discovery of a report of an examiner or the taking of a deposition of the examiner in accordance with the provisions of any other section of the Oklahoma Discovery Code.
Section 12-3235
Requests for Admissions
A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Section 3226 of this title set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request for admission unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with the summons and petition or after service of the summons and petition upon that party. The number of requests for admissions for each party is limited to thirty. No further requests for admission will be served unless authorized by the court. If counsel for a party believes that more than thirty requests for admissions are necessary, he shall consult with opposing counsel promptly and attempt to reach a written stipulation as to a reasonable number of additional requests for admissions. Counsel are expected to comply with this requirement in good faith. In the event a written stipulation cannot be agreed upon, the party seeking to submit such additional requests for admissions shall file a motion with the court (1) showing that counsel have conferred in good faith but sincere attempts to resolve the issue have been unavailing, (2) showing reasons establishing good cause for their use, and (3) setting forth the proposed additional requests. Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless, within thirty (30) days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party or by his attorney, but unless the court shortens the time, a defendant shall not be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of forty-five (45) days after service of the summons and petition upon him.
If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that a party qualify his answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, he shall specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless he states that he has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by him is insufficient to enable him to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; he may, subject to the provisions of subsection D of Section 3237 of this title, deny the matter or set forth reasons why he cannot admit or deny it.
The party who has requested the admission may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of this section, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served.
The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request be made at a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior to trial. The provisions of paragraph 4 of subsection A of Section 3237 of this title apply to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion. Section 12-3236
Compel Discovery
A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling discovery as follows:
An application for an order to a party may be made to the court in which the action is pending, or, on matters, relating to a deposition, to the district court in the county where the deposition is being taken. An application for an order to a deponent who is not a party shall be made to the district court in the county where the deposition is being taken or to the court in which the action is pending.
If a deponent fails to answer a question propounded or submitted under Section 3230 or 3231 of this title, or a corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under paragraph 6 of subsection C of Section 3230 or subsection A of Section 3231 of this title, or a party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted under Section 3233 of this title, or if a party, in response to a request for inspection submitted under Section 3234 of this title, fails to respond that the inspection will be permitted as requested or fails to permit the inspection as requested, the discovering party may move for an order compelling an answer, or a designation, or an order compelling inspection in accordance with the request. The motion must include a statement that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer either in person or by telephone with the person or party failing to make the discovery in an effort to secure the information or material without court action. When taking a deposition on oral examination, the proponent of the question may complete or adjourn the examination before he applies for an order.
If the court denies the motion in whole or in part, it may make such protective order as it would have been empowered to make on a motion made pursuant to subsection C of Section 3226 of this title.
For purposes of this subsection, an evasive or incomplete answer is to be treated as a failure to answer. Section 12-3237
Domestic Actions Discovery Notes
If you require extra time to respond to discovery, you should ask the other side for an extension in writing. It may also be necessary to enter an order granting the extension to protect your rights.
Discovery questions are limited in number so select the most important questions to ask the other side. Don't waste your requests writing questions that you already know the answer to.