FRCP 41(a)(1)(A) provides circumstances in which the plaintiff may file motions to dismiss their case with or without a court order. An educational leader in the thriving North Texas region, UTA nurtures minds within an environment that values excellence, ingenuity, and diversity.," The second dismissal is with prejudice, that. Lee Lillard of Arlington, Texas.
Lillard filed suit in December 2013 to challenge RFR As by organizations supporting gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and queer (GLUT) people, and their families, on grounds that were not legally tenable, or, in the alternative, were legally tenable only to the extent that the plaintiffs had been able to prove that the organizations were using the RFR As to intentionally discriminate against them. The first complaint at issue in this case, filed on November 24, 2012, by Lillard, alleged that the groups had engaged in a pattern or practice of intentional discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1), against GLUT persons and persons with respect to their employment and advancement, and in violation of the Fair Housing Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., against GLUT persons and persons with respect to their rental or real property.
Disclaimer
The materials in this section are taken from public sources. We disclaim all representations or any warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, authenticity, reliability, accessibility, adequacy, or completeness of any data in this paragraph. Nevertheless, we make every effort to cite public sources deemed reliable and trustworthy.