Court of Appeals of Texas,Corpus Christi. Norman L. DANIELS, Jr., Appellant, v.-Corpus Christi 1976, no writ); Bredeson v. LOCAL RULE CV-50 Judgment as a Matter of Law in a Jury Trial . A Practice Note providing an overview of the summary judgment framework under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a. STOVER Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi. Case opinion for TX Court of Appeals DANIELS v. DANIELS. —Corpus Christi 1982, writ ref'd n.r. Baxter Brinkmann Is Entitled To Recover His Attorneys' Fees and Costs Under. The Declaratory Judgment Act.
CASE NO.: CV-56 The Texas Supreme Court denied the declaratory judgment motion in a case in which the defendant sought money damages from the plaintiff for failure to appear on his case. See n.r. in DANIELS v. DANIELS. On appeal, the Court of Appeals in Corpus Christi, reversed and remanded, holding that: (1) a party should be entitled to seek money damages in a declaratory judgment action because he or she should have been afforded the right to request such relief when the plaintiff's failure to appear was the reason for the delay, and (2) the plaintiff's failure to appear does not constitute a reason for delay when it was “a factor contributing to the delay” rather than “a factor contributing to the delay that was the sole reason for the plaintiff's failure to appear.” —Corpus Christi 1982, no. 76. Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi. Case opinion for TX Court of Appeals DANIELS v. DANIELS. —Corpus Christi 1982, no. 81.
Disclaimer
The materials in this section are taken from public sources. We disclaim all representations or any warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, authenticity, reliability, accessibility, adequacy, or completeness of any data in this paragraph. Nevertheless, we make every effort to cite public sources deemed reliable and trustworthy.