Carrollton Texas Summary Judgment

• Category: Texas Court Samples - Collections - Finance Lease Agreements - Sample Case 1
• State: Texas
• City: Carrollton
• Control #: TX-G0135
• Format: PDF

Description

A05 Summary Judgment Carrollton Texas Summary Judgment is a legal term that refers to a procedural tool used in civil cases to resolve a lawsuit before it goes to trial. It allows either party involved in a legal dispute to request the court to decide in their favor without the need for a trial. This judgment is typically sought when the parties believe there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute, and the case can be decided based on the law alone. In Carrollton Texas, there are different types of summary judgments that can be pursued: 1. Traditional Summary Judgment: This is the most commonly used type of summary judgment in Carrollton Texas. It is based on Rule 166a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which allows the moving to assert that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The moving must provide evidence supporting their position and can rely on pleadings, affidavits, depositions, interrogatory answers, and any other appropriate evidence. 2. No-evidence Summary Judgment: This type of summary judgment is governed by Rule 166a(i) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. It allows a party to seek judgment if the opposing party cannot provide sufficient evidence supporting their claims. The moving party must file a motion pointing out the absence of evidence on specific elements of the opposing party's claim. The opposing party then has a duty to present evidence demonstrating the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. 3. Summary Judgment on Counterclaim: In some cases, a defendant may assert a counterclaim against the plaintiff. If the defendant believes that there are no genuine issues of material fact, and they are entitled to judgment in their favor, they can file a motion for summary judgment on their counterclaim. 4. Summary Judgment on Cross-claim: Similarly, when there are multiple defendants involved in a lawsuit who have filed cross-claims against each other, any defendant can seek summary judgment on their cross-claim if they meet the requirements of a summary judgment motion. Carrollton Texas Summary Judgment can be a valuable legal tool for parties seeking a prompt resolution to their legal disputes. It is important to consult with an experienced attorney who can assess the case's merits and determine if pursuing summary judgment is appropriate based on the specific circumstances of the lawsuit.

Carrollton Texas Summary Judgment is a legal term that refers to a procedural tool used in civil cases to resolve a lawsuit before it goes to trial. It allows either party involved in a legal dispute to request the court to decide in their favor without the need for a trial. This judgment is typically sought when the parties believe there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute, and the case can be decided based on the law alone. In Carrollton Texas, there are different types of summary judgments that can be pursued: 1. Traditional Summary Judgment: This is the most commonly used type of summary judgment in Carrollton Texas. It is based on Rule 166a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which allows the moving to assert that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The moving must provide evidence supporting their position and can rely on pleadings, affidavits, depositions, interrogatory answers, and any other appropriate evidence. 2. No-evidence Summary Judgment: This type of summary judgment is governed by Rule 166a(i) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. It allows a party to seek judgment if the opposing party cannot provide sufficient evidence supporting their claims. The moving party must file a motion pointing out the absence of evidence on specific elements of the opposing party's claim. The opposing party then has a duty to present evidence demonstrating the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. 3. Summary Judgment on Counterclaim: In some cases, a defendant may assert a counterclaim against the plaintiff. If the defendant believes that there are no genuine issues of material fact, and they are entitled to judgment in their favor, they can file a motion for summary judgment on their counterclaim. 4. Summary Judgment on Cross-claim: Similarly, when there are multiple defendants involved in a lawsuit who have filed cross-claims against each other, any defendant can seek summary judgment on their cross-claim if they meet the requirements of a summary judgment motion. Carrollton Texas Summary Judgment can be a valuable legal tool for parties seeking a prompt resolution to their legal disputes. It is important to consult with an experienced attorney who can assess the case's merits and determine if pursuing summary judgment is appropriate based on the specific circumstances of the lawsuit.