Frisco Texas Summary Judgment is a legal term that refers to a specific type of judgment in a court case that is issued when there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute and one party believes they are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. This judgment can be highly advantageous as it allows for a speedy and efficient resolution to litigation, saving both time and resources. In Frisco, Texas, there are primarily two types of summary judgments that can be pursued, namely partial summary judgment and total summary judgment. Partial summary judgment occurs when certain issues or claims within a lawsuit are resolved without affecting the remaining issues. This means that some claims may still proceed to trial while others are settled through summary judgment, streamlining the overall legal process. Total summary judgment, on the other hand, is sought when a party believes that no genuine issues of material fact exist for any aspect of the case, leading to a complete resolution of the matter without the need for a trial. If successful, this judgment concludes the entire case in favor of one party, effectively dismissing all claims against the other. To obtain a summary judgment in Frisco, Texas, several requirements must generally be met. Firstly, the moving party must provide evidence that there are no genuine disputes regarding the material facts of the case. This evidence may include affidavits, documents, or other relevant materials that support their arguments. Secondly, the moving party must demonstrate that they are legally entitled to judgment based on the applicable laws and statutes. Finally, the opposing party is given an opportunity to present their own evidence or arguments to counter the summary judgment motion and demonstrate issues of material fact that should be resolved at trial. In summary, Frisco Texas Summary Judgment is a legal tool available to parties involved in a lawsuit that is aimed at resolving disputes efficiently and expeditiously. Whether pursued as a partial or total judgment, it allows the court to rule in favor of one party when no genuine issues of material fact exist, effectively ending the case or narrowing the scope of the remaining issues.