The Abilene Texas Order of Substituted Service under Rule 106 is a legal procedure used in civil litigation when a party cannot be served with a lawsuit through traditional means. This rule allows for alternative methods of service to ensure that all parties involved are properly notified of the pending legal action. Under the Abilene Texas Order of Substituted Service, there are different types of substituted service methods that can be used, depending on the circumstances of the case. These methods include: 1. Certified Mail: In some situations, the court may authorize service of the lawsuit via certified mail. The plaintiff must send the necessary legal documents to the defendant's last known address and obtain proof of delivery. 2. Posting: If the defendant's whereabouts are unknown, or if they are intentionally avoiding service, the court may order service by posting a notice of the lawsuit in a designated public place. This could be a courthouse, newspaper, or online publication. 3. Service by Publication: In cases where the defendant's whereabouts are completely unknown, the court may allow service by publication. This involves publishing a notice of the lawsuit in a newspaper or other publication approved by the court for a specified period of time. 4. Service on an Authorized Agent: If the defendant has appointed an authorized agent to accept legal documents on their behalf, service can be made to that agent. It's important to note that obtaining an Abilene Texas Order of Substituted Service under Rule 106 requires a motion to the court, outlining the reasons why traditional service methods have been unsuccessful or impractical. The court will then evaluate the motion, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, before deciding whether to grant the order. Proper service of a lawsuit is crucial to ensuring due process and allowing all parties to have their day in court. The Abilene Texas Order of Substituted Service under Rule 106 provides a mechanism for parties to be served when traditional methods are not feasible, ensuring that the legal process continues to move forward.