Mesquite Texas Order of Substituted Service Under Rule 106 is a legal process used when it is difficult to serve a defendant directly with legal papers. This method allows for alternative ways to deliver legal documents and notify parties involved in a legal case. The Order of Substituted Service Under Rule 106 is governed by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which provide guidelines to ensure due process is followed. When a plaintiff has made diligent efforts to serve a defendant personally but has been unsuccessful, they can request the court to issue an Order of Substituted Service Under Rule 106. This order allows them to serve the defendant through alternative means. It is important to note that this method can only be used when traditional methods of personal service have failed. There are different types of Mesquite Texas Order of Substituted Service Under Rule 106. These variations primarily depend on the type of alternative service being requested. Some common types include: 1. Substituted Service by Posting: This type of substituted service involves posting a copy of the legal documents in a prominent place, such as the defendant's residence or workplace. The court may also require the plaintiff to send a copy of the documents by certified mail. 2. Substituted Service by Mail: In this variation, the court allows the plaintiff to serve the defendant by certified mail with return receipt requested. The plaintiff must provide proof of mailing and the signed receipt as evidence of service. 3. Substituted Service by Publication: When the defendant's whereabouts are unknown, or they cannot be located despite reasonable efforts, the court may authorize service by publication. This involves publishing a notice of the lawsuit in a local newspaper or other approved publications for a specified period. The Mesquite Texas Order of Substituted Service Under Rule 106 aims to ensure that all parties involved in a legal case have been appropriately notified of the proceedings. It provides a way to achieve service when traditional methods prove challenging. However, it is crucial for plaintiffs to demonstrate their efforts to serve the defendant personally have been exhaustive before requesting an order for substituted service.