The Tarrant Texas Order of Substituted Service Under Rule 106 is a legal mechanism that allows for alternative methods of serving legal documents to a party involved in a lawsuit when traditional methods of personal service are not feasible or have been unsuccessful. Under Rule 106 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, a party seeking substituted service must request an order from the court outlining the specific alternative method of service they wish to employ. This order grants permission to serve the legal documents through means other than personal delivery. There are several types of Tarrant Texas Orders of Substituted Service Under Rule 106 that may be utilized depending on the circumstances of the case. These include: 1. Substituted Service by Mail: This method allows for service of documents to be done by sending them through certified or registered mail with return receipt requested. The recipient must sign the receipt to confirm receipt of the documents. 2. Substituted Service by Posting: If the party's whereabouts are unknown, or they are evading service, the court may allow for service by posting the legal documents at a designated location or on a courthouse bulletin board. This method usually requires additional steps to ensure reasonable notice, such as publication in a local newspaper. 3. Substituted Service by Publication: In cases where the party's location is completely unknown, service by publication may be utilized. This involves publishing a notice of the lawsuit in a newspaper of general circulation within the county where the lawsuit is filed. The publication must meet specific requirements set by the court. It is important to note that obtaining a Tarrant Texas Order of Substituted Service Under Rule 106 does not guarantee successful service or establish jurisdiction over the party being served. It simply provides a legally recognized alternative to traditional personal service when circumstances require it. When requesting a Tarrant Texas Order of Substituted Service Under Rule 106, it is crucial to provide sufficient evidence to justify the need for alternative service and to outline the proposed method clearly and concisely. The court will review the request and decide whether to grant or deny the order based on the information provided.