Pasadena Texas Judgment by Jury Trial is a legal process where a case is decided by a jury instead of a judge. This type of trial allows a panel of individuals, called jurors, to review evidence and listen to arguments presented by both parties involved in the case. During a Pasadena Texas Judgment by Jury Trial, a jury is selected from a pool of potential candidates. These jurors must be unbiased and have no prior knowledge or personal connection to the case. The jury is typically composed of 12 individuals, although the number may vary depending on the specific circumstances of the trial. The purpose of a Pasadena Texas Judgment by Jury Trial is to have a fair and impartial group of people evaluate the evidence and make a decision based on the facts presented during the trial. The jury listens to witness testimonies, examines physical evidence, and considers relevant laws and regulations before reaching a verdict. There are different types of Pasadena Texas Judgment by Jury Trials, each pertaining to specific legal matters. Some common types of cases that may involve a jury trial in Pasadena, Texas, include personal injury lawsuits, criminal cases, civil disputes, contract disputes, and medical malpractice claims. In a personal injury case, a jury may evaluate the negligence of a defendant and determine the amount of compensation to be awarded to the plaintiff. In a criminal case, the jury decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty based on the evidence presented by the prosecution and defense. Civil disputes, such as contract disputes or property disputes, may also be resolved through a Pasadena Texas Judgment by Jury Trial. The jury assesses the facts of the case and comes to a decision that may result in the awarding of damages or other forms of relief to the prevailing party. Overall, a Pasadena Texas Judgment by Jury Trial is a fundamental aspect of the legal system that offers individuals the opportunity to have their case heard and decided upon by a group of their peers. This process ensures fairness and transparency in the judicial system and allows for a wider range of perspectives to be considered when reaching a verdict.